正文翻譯

原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.ltaaa.com 翻譯：bluebit 轉載請注明出處

0

Pennsylvania just became the third state to ban child marriage
BY AUDREY MCNAMARAMAY 11, 2020 / 8:31 AM / CBS NEWS

賓夕法尼亞州剛剛成為第三個禁止童婚的州
（以下為CBS電視臺該新聞節(jié)目的部分截圖）

0

Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf on Friday signed into law a ban on child marriage, making it the third state to fully outlaw marriage for people under the age of 18. Only Delaware and New Jersey also ban child marriage.?

上周五（注：5月8日）賓夕法尼亞州州長湯姆·沃爾夫簽署了一項禁止童婚的法律，使該州成為第三個完全禁止18歲以下未成年人結婚的州。之前只有特拉華和新澤西州禁止童婚

0

0

According to Unchained, an organization that works to end forced and child marriage in the United States, an estimated more than 2,300 children between 15 to 17 living in Pennsylvania were married under those exceptions since 2014.?

不過，據(jù)致力于廢除美國強迫婚姻和童婚的Unchained組織估計，自2014年以來，賓夕法尼亞州依然有超過2300名15至17歲的少年未獲得法庭批準或未在監(jiān)護人的同意下結婚。

0

0

（Unchained組織 推特上的截圖，推特內容為：賓夕法尼亞州成為美國第三個廢除童婚的州!該州立法委員增加了新冠時期修正案，以便在新冠流行期間快速推進，并且組織了遠程投票活動。但目前其余47個州仍有童婚情況存在）

0

According to marriage-license data from across the United States analyzed by Unchained, some 248,000 children at least as young as 12 years old were married in the U.S. between 2000 and 2010. An overwhelming majority of them were females.?

據(jù)Unchained組織分析的全美結婚許可證數(shù)據(jù)， 2000年至2010年間，美國約有24.8萬名12歲以下的兒童結婚。其中絕大多數(shù)是女性。

0

"These were not ''Romeo and Juliet'' situations," Unchained says on its website. "Some 77% of the children wed were minor girls married to adult men, often with significant age differences. Some children were wed at an age, or with a spousal age difference, that constitutes statutory rape under their state''s laws."

“這里沒有‘羅密歐與朱麗葉’的場景，”Unchained網(wǎng)站上寫到?！凹s有77%的未成年女童嫁給成年男子，而且他們之間的年齡往往相差很大，由于這些女孩未到法定結婚年齡，且常與結婚對象年齡相差巨大，據(jù)他們所在州的法律，這構成了法定強奸。”

0

The minimum marriage age in most U.S. states is 18, according to Unchained, but 47 states allow people under 18 to get married through exceptions like parental consent or judicial approval. Several states do not have any minimum age for which children cannot marry.?

據(jù)Unchained組織表示，美國大多數(shù)州所允許的最低結婚年齡是18歲，但仍有47個州允許18歲以下的人結婚，不過有一些例外，比如通過父母同意或者司法批準。其中個別的州對最低結婚年齡并沒有法律限制。

0

"Obviously, one child''s parental consent is another child''s parental coercion, but state laws do not call for anyone to ask the children whether they are being pressured into marriage," reads Unchained''s information on common exceptions. "Even when a girl sobs openly while her parents sign the application and force her into marriage, the clerk has no authority to intervene."

“顯然，這個是其中一方父母逼迫另一方父母同意孩子結婚，但國家法律并沒有明門規(guī)定是否需要征求孩子的意愿”，Unchained組織在關于例外結婚的評論中寫道?！凹幢阋粋€女孩在父母的強迫下簽署結婚申請時當眾哭泣，辦事員也無權干涉?！?/p>

0

0

評論翻譯

原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.ltaaa.com 翻譯：bluebit 轉載請注明出處

0

0

BenjaminBenjamin
How are there 47 other states that allow someone who can’t buy tobacco or vote to be allowed to be married?

為什么還有其他47個州還在允許那些既不能買煙也不能投票的孩子結婚?

0

0

0

KeithKeith
I''ll be more impressed when Utah passes such a law.

如果猶他州也能通過這樣的法律，我會更加感動的。

0

0

EE
I don''t even think the average 18 year old today is mature enough to make that decision. We do let them vote though.

直到現(xiàn)在我都認為18歲的人仍沒有成熟到可以做出這樣的決定。雖然他們到了投票年齡。

0

0

0

CraigCraig
The argument is not about freedom...its about the fact almost all the children ARE forced into marriage. Nothibg to do with freedom or Islam.

問題的焦點無關自由……事實上，幾乎所有的孩子都是被迫結婚的。跟自由或是否是伊斯蘭沒啥關系。

0

SeaSea
First cousin marriage is still legal in many US states and the world.

表親之間結婚在美國許多州和世界上某些地方仍是合法的。

0

0

dinodino

Our country has some serious issues to deal with, I guess. 錨點Common sense does not live here anymore.
我想我們國家有一些嚴重的問題亟待解決。人們已經(jīng)沒有常識概念了。

0

ScottScott
Too young to marry but okay to change genders. Amazing.

結婚年齡可以小、還能改變性別。真是神奇。

0

PhilPhil
So, one can join the military at 17 with parental consent and go off to war, but, cannot get married. I joined the Marines at 17. They thought I was mature enough to go fight in a war at that age, and that legal age to join the military still exists. I guess you can be old enough to lay down your life for your country, but, not old enough to get married. Strange world we live in!

既然一個人可以在父母同意的情況下在17歲參軍打仗，那為什么不能在這個年齡結婚呢。17歲時候我加入海軍陸戰(zhàn)隊。他們認為我已經(jīng)足夠成熟，可以在那個年齡參加戰(zhàn)爭，這也是參軍法定年齡。我想我已經(jīng)到了可以為國獻身的年齡了，但是卻還不能結婚。我們真是生活在一個奇怪的世界里啊!

0

PamelaPamela
Who the flip is marrying off their 12 year old daughter to an older man??? Is there a cultural piece to this story or these statistics that we are missing here?

誰會把12歲的女兒嫁給一個比自己還要大的男人?這個故事或這些統(tǒng)計數(shù)據(jù)中難道沒忽略掉我們自身上的文化頑疾?

0

CHARLESCHARLES
Use to have a friend from Tennessee he was 25 his wife was 15 he would drop her off at school on his way to work

老婆15歲，老公在上班的路上時順帶送她去學校？?。。?/p>

0

GreenGreen
Having laws not in place long ago to protect children in regards to this is disgusting and disturbing.

在這方面，一直還沒有保護兒童的法律，讓人討厭憂心。

0

JohnJohn
This is the United States and Child Marriages should already have been banned a century ago in EVERY STATE!

這里可是美國啊，各個州早在一個世紀前就應該禁止童婚!

0

RR
Forcing young people to not get married is just as bad as forcing them to get married. The problem here is the "Force" part. There is no physical reason to restrict them. Just because some "Adults" think that''s what is best for them doesn''t mean it really is.

強迫年輕人不結婚和強迫他們結婚一樣糟糕。這里的問題核心是“強迫”。沒有任何物理上的理由來限制它們。僅僅是因為一些“成年人”感覺這是為他們好，即使不一定是真的好。

0

Get RealGet Real
34 years ago my high school sweetheart and I were wed, she was 17 years old and I was 20. I had joined the U.S. Navy right out of high school and had been away a full year and it was going to be another year before I saw her again due to a new assignment, so we got married and she came with me. This law would have prevented me and my wife of 34 years from getting married, so I am against it, just because it''s not something you would do doesn''t mean it is wrong.

34年前，我和高中時代的戀人結婚了，當時她17歲，我20歲。我高中一畢業(yè)就加入了美國海軍，離開她整整一年，接著又來一項新任務，我可能又得過一年才能再次見到她，所以在執(zhí)行這項新任務前我們結婚了，不再分離。這條法律本可以阻止我和我妻子34年的婚姻，之所以我反對它，僅僅是因為早結婚并不意味著這是錯誤的。

0

I hate your dogI hate your dog
Most relationships consist of the male being 1-5 years older than females, so it''s no surprise that most of the underage marriage participants are female. Some of these situations are no doubt exploitive, but the vast majority are probably 19 year olds, married to 17 year olds, or something similar.

大多數(shù)戀愛關系都是男方比女方大1-5歲，所以大多數(shù)女性都在未成年也就不足為奇了。當然這其中有些情況無疑是屬于占有性的，但絕大多數(shù)可能是19歲男生娶17歲的女孩或者類似的情況。

0

Whogonecheckmeboo?Whogonecheckmeboo?
Good. Society doesn''t benefit from the marriage of children.

不錯，童婚對社會進步?jīng)]有什么好處。

0

MarcelDMarcelD
Only three states.. Pretty insane when you think about it.

現(xiàn)在只有三個州禁止童婚，想想就會讓人發(fā)瘋。

0

CelebrationCelebration
OK. But why are unmarried underage girls allowed to have babies?

好吧，那怎么就可以允許未婚未成年女孩生孩子呢？

0

AlfaAlfa
This all seems a century or two late.

這一切的決定似乎晚了一兩個世紀。

0

Jeffrey1234Jeffrey1234
Without a doubt this infringes upon Americans pursuit of liberty and happiness.
That being said, no one under 18 should be married. This is a modern society. You should be an adult to make this decision.

無疑，這侵犯了美國人對自由和幸福的追求。我意思是說，未滿18歲的人不應該結婚。這是一個現(xiàn)代社會。你應該在成人后才能做出這樣的決定。

0

JohnJohn
Why is this still legal in 47 states?

為什么這種事兒在其他47個州怎么還在合法？

0

SatansSatans
This is great that this happened. Pennsylvania said no to this kind of legalized pedophilia. 3 down, 47 states to go.

這事兒真是太好了。賓夕法尼亞州在對這種變相戀童癖合法化說不。3個州已經(jīng)成功，還有47個州尚需努力。

0

Crystal B Crystal B
There are a several ethnic groups in these states that promote child marriages.

有幾個州的里的少數(shù)民族是提倡童婚的的。

0

Hank
All 50 states and US territories should ban child marriages !

美國所有的50個州都應該禁止童婚

0

eniseenise
It shouldn’t exist in any state, how is this a thing!?

這種情況在任何時候都不應該存在，到底這是怎么回事??？

0

Frank PFrank P
Ban child marriages .but allow "girls " who are as young as 13 years old to have babies?

禁止童婚，但允許13歲 “女孩”生孩子?

0

M.C.M.C.

Yet Pennsylvania still allows those under 18 to be pumped up with hormones and subjected to "錨點gender affirming" medical and surgical procedures.
不過，賓夕法尼亞州卻允許18歲以下的青少年注射荷爾蒙，可以進行“變性”手術

0

SusanSusan
Kids under 18 aren''t mature enough to vote but they can get married in most states. Wake up America! We are failing to protect our children. Other modern countries offer paternity leave, public healthcare, public education below grade K (childcare) and above grade 12.... We do not offer these comforts to our citizens. In the USA 2 adults each working forty hours a week for minimum wage can not support a family. This is unheard of in other modern countries. Plus our citizens worry about going bankrupt if a family member becomes ill. We do not want to do away with public schools, fire and police departments, libraries, roads etc. juc st because they represent democratic socialism. We are very glad these things were put into place even though they aren’t perfect. It was smart to do so. It is past time for our generation to put things in place. All the other modern, progressive countries are not wrong for adding public healthcare. Public education isn’t perfect. Public healthcare won’t be perfect either but we won’t want to do away with it. We have children going to sleep tonight with no access to an antibiotic because their parents can’t afford to feed them and buy them an antibiotic. When it makes sense to add necessities, we add them. Citizens in the past had no problem adding libraries, kindergarten, expanding public education from grades 1-6 to grades k -12. They did what made sense in order to keep up with the modern world. It’s way past time to add public healthcare that is the same for everyone. Universal healthcare needs to be appropriate for the people in government as well as all citizens because no one is less than or superior. Healthcare is a right. It is time that we, like other countries, offer above grade 12, below grade k childcare and paternity leave. It is time for two parents working forty hours a week making minimum wage to be able to support a family. What are we waiting for? It’s time to support our children by providing for them as they would be provided for if they resided in other modern countries. Why should they sit in school with no hearing aids or eye glasses and return home to parents stressing over illness because they can’t afford healthcare? This wouldn’t happen to them if they lived in other modern countries. Why should we pay ten times what others pay for the same medication? Why should we have our food prepared by ill citizens who can’t afford healthcare? Providing no preventative care costs all of us in the long run. We already spend twice as much on healthcare as other modern countries. It’s time to shout these inequalities from the rooftop in order to protect our kids. It is time to recognize that 1% of our population owns as much as 99%. It is time to recognize that there are 40 million people living in poverty in the USA. It isn’t time to be wishy washy moderates, afraid to rock the boat.

未到18歲的孩子都還不夠成熟，他們既然無權投票，但在大多數(shù)州他們卻可以結婚。醒醒吧美國！是我們沒能保護好自己的孩子。其他現(xiàn)代國家都已經(jīng)提供產(chǎn)假，病假、公共醫(yī)療、幼兒園和12歲以上的國家義務教育了……而我們還沒有這樣的福利。美國的年人每周工作40個小時，只拿最低工資是無法養(yǎng)家糊口的。這種事在其他國家?guī)缀醪豢赡艽嬖?。此外，人們還非常害怕家里人得病，那樣會直接導致破產(chǎn)。人們不希望取消公立學校、消防、警局、圖書館、道路等，因為它們代表民主社會主義。
很高興這些事都沒發(fā)生，盡管它們不完美。但卻是必不可少。我們這一代人是應該到了撥亂反正的時候了。其他所有現(xiàn)代、先進國家都是因為增加公共醫(yī)療而保證不出問題。雖然公共教育不完美。錨點公共醫(yī)療也不完美，但我們不想失去它們。沒有抗生素我們無法讓孩子們安心睡眠，因為他們的父母負擔不起喂養(yǎng)他們和給他們買抗生素的費用。當人們有這種需求時就應該加大投入。以前，市民們可以通過圖書館、幼兒園、以及1至12年的國家義務教育來提升自己。為了能跟上現(xiàn)代世界的步伐去做他們認為有意義的事。享受公平的公共醫(yī)療體系已經(jīng)是過去的事了。全民醫(yī)療必須一視同仁，不分高低貴賤?？床∈且豁棛嗬?。是時候像其他國家一樣，提供國家義務教育、產(chǎn)假、陪產(chǎn)假了。
現(xiàn)在是兩個父母每周工作40個小時，拿著最低工資養(yǎng)家糊口。我們還在等什么?是時候為孩子加大投入了，就像其他現(xiàn)代國家一樣。孩子們在沒有助聽器或眼鏡的情況下是無法潛心學習的，只有回到父母身邊，負擔不起醫(yī)療費用為什么還要承受著疾病的折磨呢？如果這里真的是一個現(xiàn)代國家，這種事就不會發(fā)生在他們身上。同樣的藥為什么我們要比其他的人多花十倍的錢去買?我們應該為那些負擔不起醫(yī)療費用的病人提供食物。從長遠來看，沒有任何預防措施將使我們所有人付出代價。我們在醫(yī)療保健上的花費業(yè)已是其他現(xiàn)代國家的兩倍。為了保護我們自己的孩子，是時候讓上層大聲呼吁解決這些不平等問題了。人們難道還沒有意識到，現(xiàn)在1%的人擁有著高達99%的財富。人們應該看到美國現(xiàn)在仍有4000萬人生活在貧困之中?，F(xiàn)在不是成為優(yōu)柔寡斷的溫和派、害怕惹是生非的時候了。

0

MandyMandy
My God!!! WHY would ANY state allow child marriage!! Do we live in the dark ages?????

我的上帝! ! !為什么所有州都出現(xiàn)過童婚現(xiàn)象呢!!我們還在生活在黑暗時代嗎?

0

Devils Advocate
So just to be clear a law that would by its very nature create MORE unwed mothers is somehow a good thing? And let''s not forget that you can still choose to have a pregnancy terminated at under 18 but you CAN''T choose to get married? This seems to be more of a law based on emotion rather than logic...

要清醒的是，從本質上來講，這種法律會創(chuàng)造出更多的未婚媽媽，但這是個好事嗎?可別忘了，在18歲以下你仍然可以選擇墮胎，但你不能選擇結婚?這似乎更像是一種基于情感而非邏輯的法則。

0

Reporter
It shouldn’t exist at all in the US!

這種事就根本不應該存在于美國!

0

MICHAELMMICHAELM
just remember this, right wing christians:
it''s not evil, godless, liberals that fought to keep child marriage laws on the books, it was 100 percent you guys.
my state of florida will let a 40 year old man marry the 10 year girl he raped and knocked up, and only let a man do it.
40 year woman gets knocked up by 12 year old boy? she gets prison. the man? why, he gets a child bride (and doesn''t even have to keep the kid. can marry the girl, get her an abortion the next day, marriage stands, and she can''t file for divorce til she''s 18 under any circumstances. and don''t blame libs for that, florida house and senate have been republican led for decades).

你們這幫右翼基督徒們，請記住：并不是邪惡的，無信仰的，自由主義者在為將童婚合法化，而是你們這幫家伙。
我所在的佛羅里達州有個40歲男的娶了一個被他強奸且懷孕的10歲女孩，而且規(guī)定只讓這個男人娶。
還有個40歲的女人被一個12歲的男孩搞懷孕了！這個女的進監(jiān)獄了么？那個男的呢？ 憑什么這個男的白得了一個童養(yǎng)媳（強制這個男的收留這個女孩。他可以和這個女孩結婚，第二天讓她墮胎，婚姻仍然是合法的，在18歲之前這孩子在任何情況下都不能提出離婚申請。不要責怪那些自由主義者，佛羅里達州的眾議院和參議院已經(jīng)在共和黨的把持下能有幾十年了）

0

Tony PTony P
Instead of making it state law - it should be banned nationwide. No reason on earth for a 15 year old to be getting married to anyone anywhere.

與其制定州法律何不如制定一個全國法律讓全州都執(zhí)行。在任何地方都完全沒有理由讓一個15歲的孩子和其他人結婚。

0

Anonymous
The fact that they had to deliberate in order to decide to make this a law speaks volumes as to the overall quality of the human race.

事實上，為避免影響人類的整體素質，制定這種法規(guī)應該慎之又慎.

0

B ParksB Parks
I lived in PA a long time ago, there were 3 girls in my 7th grade class that had kids, I am surprised by this.

以前我在賓夕法尼亞上過學，初一時，我們班上有個女同學就已經(jīng)有三個孩子了，讓我驚奇壞了。

0

CatCat
marriage before the age of 30 should be banned in most cases.

多數(shù)情況下，30歲之前結婚都應該算早的。

0

CurtCurt
Children having children

孩子又有了孩子

0

Tony PTony P
Muslims can marry a 14 year old back in their homeland. This law will ban that here even if try to say it''s part of their religious beliefs.

在穆斯林的國家里，14歲就可以結婚了，但在這里就不行了，即使他們說他們的宗教習俗

0

GeneGene
We can understand why a license should be required to drive a car, fly a plane, or practice medicine. But why should a license be required to get married? It''s just a government intrusion into people''s private lives.

開車要求有駕照證，開飛機要求有飛行駕照證，當醫(yī)生要求行醫(yī)證，這我都能理解。但我不理解的是，結婚為什么也必須要求有結婚證呢?這完全是政府對人們私生活的干涉。

0

The Man With No NameThe Man With No Name
Mohammed had 14 wives and his second one was Aisha who was 7 at the time but for some reason liberal progressives just love the Muslim culture.

穆罕默德有14個老婆，他第二個老婆叫艾莎，當時艾莎只有7歲，但出于某種原因，自由激進者就是喜歡這種穆斯林文化。

0

ThomasThomas
One more religious freedom gone.

又一個宗教自由消失了

0

Rich Rich
Pennsylvania has a large Amish population. I personally don’t think 16-17 yr olds should get married, but I’d bet 99.98% of these “child marriages” are within the Amish communities. That said, is there really a defining difference between a 17 yr old and an 18yr old?

賓夕法尼亞州有很多錨點錨點阿米什人（注：阿米什人，基督新教再洗禮派門諾會信徒，該派信徒遵守與世隔絕、排斥現(xiàn)代科技，崇尚簡樸生活）。我個人認為16-17歲的人不應該結婚，但我敢打賭99.98%的“童婚”都發(fā)生在阿米什社區(qū)。也就是說，17歲和18歲之間真的有區(qū)別嗎?

0

RICHARD FRISCHKORNRICHARD FRISCHKORN
Actually,I thought all states banned child marriage.Those that don''t,should

事實上，我以為所有的州都沒有童婚呢，這也太也不應該了。

0

Anonymous
Well, it is due to life expectancy increasing as much as it has in the last 100 years.
It was not uncommon for people to die in their 40s before WW2, so people got married young.
Time has passed and most people in the US, at least, live til around 80.
It is just one of those things that they never got around to changing in many places, but it is only a few small segments of society (mormons, amish, islamics) that do most of the child marriage these days.

照比一百年前現(xiàn)代人的預期壽命大大增長。二戰(zhàn)前，在40多歲時就去世的人并不少見，所以那時的人們結婚就很早。隨著時代的進步，大多數(shù)美國人活到了80多歲。
由于很少人注意到這點很多地方的法律沒有來得及改，現(xiàn)在只有社會中的一小部分人(摩門教徒、阿米什人、伊斯蘭教徒)才會進行童婚。

0

AliBaba''sCamel
My grandparents were married at age 16 and it was fine. My grandfather skipped second grade and then did high school in 3 instead of 4 years and was a high school graduate at age 16 with a good work ethic and was perfectly capable of supporting a wife and kids. Back in 1936 there was nothing wrong with this and there should be nothing wrong with it now. A 16YO is not a "child." A 16YO is able to consent to sex in most states, why not marriage?

我的祖父母16歲就結婚了，還不錯。我的祖父跳了一年級，用了3年而不是4年讀完了高中，16歲高中畢業(yè)，算是個文化人了，完全有能力養(yǎng)活妻子和孩子。1936年的時候沒有任何問題，現(xiàn)在也應該更沒有任何問題。16歲已經(jīng)不是“孩子”了。在大多數(shù)州，一個16歲的女孩都能同意發(fā)生性行為，所以，16歲為什么就不能結婚呢

0

KanjipeenjiKanjipeenji
wow.. i didnt realize america had this :)

哇哦~~無法想象，美國居然還存在有這種事情 ：）

0