正文翻譯

圖

評論翻譯

Jaxxx19
It’ll take the US 10+years building just to barely come close to that

美國需要10多年的時間才能勉強接近這一規(guī)模

getonurkneesnbeg
10+years planning and figuring out where the money will come from.Then another 10+to slowly install them.Another few years to actually bring them online.It’s like how we take 8-10 years to widen a freeway once,and when it’s done,there is already more traffic so they need to do it again.
If they were smart,they would widen it 3 lanes each side while they already have the crew and equipment there.Future proof it a little and save a lot!

10年以上的計劃和找到資金的來源，然后再10年以上的緩慢安裝，再過幾年就能把它們上線了。這就像我們花8-10年的時間拓寬一次高速公路，當它完工時，已經(jīng)有了更多的交通運輸，所以他們需要再做一次。
如果他們聰明的話，他們會在那里加寬3條車道，而他們已經(jīng)有工人和設備了。未來會證明這一點，會節(jié)省很多！

DNLK
I live in a suburban area in guangdong province.Mad lads built at least one subway line with 20-30 stations EVERY YEAR since I moved there.This dynamic is something I never experienced in my life before.

我住在廣東省的一個郊區(qū)。自從我搬到那里后，瘋狂的小伙子們每年至少建一條地鐵線，有20-30個車站。這種動態(tài)變化是我一生中從未經(jīng)歷過的。

Cryogenic_Monster
I think China is spending money and effort on many things the US is falling behind on.Only threat directly at the US is how bad our power grid and infrastructure is in comparison.

我認為中國在許多美國落后的事情上花費了金錢和精力。唯一直接威脅美國的是，我們的電網(wǎng)和基礎(chǔ)設施有多糟糕。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.ltaaa.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處

poopeypnats
Funny how using the wilderness for any other purpose is absolutely fine,but the second it’s done for solar power it’s suddenly a massive issue?Even when it doesn’t even cause any harm?
Some people in this comment section have an agenda or are flat out stupid

有趣的是，如何將荒野用于任何其他用途才是特別好的呢？怎么一旦它用于太陽能，它突然是一個巨大的問題呢？即使它甚至不會造成任何傷害？
這個評論區(qū)的一些人在找事情，或者是完全愚蠢的

BluePotatoSlayer
No I hate it since it takes up so much space for something a nuclear power plant can do less than 60th of the space
And is safer

不，我討厭它，因為它占用了太多的場地來做核電站也能做的事情，只要不到60分之一的場地
而且更安全

UCLAlex
China’s already the second biggest producer of nuclear power after the US and they’re building a shit ton more reactors.Besides if someone posted a picture of a Chinese nuclear power plant reddit would just say you can’t trust them even though they’ve never had a single nuclear accident

中國已經(jīng)是僅次于美國的第二大核電生產(chǎn)國，而且他們正在建造成噸的更多的核反應堆。此外，如果有人發(fā)布了一座正在建設的中國核電站的照片，Reddit這里會只是說，你不能完全信任中國，即使他們從來沒有發(fā)生過任何一起核事故。

Chin_wOnd3r
Wow that will work for 10 years!

哇，這將能運行10年！

sysmimas
My neighbor installed his PV panels in 2006.They are still working and still have good efficiency(although not as good as the new ones,that are being manufactured these days).Where do you have the 10 year limit from?

我的鄰居在2006年安裝了他的光伏板，它們還在工作，效率仍然很好（雖然沒有新的好，比如現(xiàn)在正在制造的那些），你的10年期限從哪里來？
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.ltaaa.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處

spidersnake
Because your neighbour likely built one on their roof.This is built on the ground,where it has to compete with loose dirt,plants growing around it,and even animals bothering it.
There could be many reasons why a lot of these won't even last 5 years.

因為你的鄰居很可能在他們的屋頂上建了一個。這里是建在地面上的，在那里它必須要抵抗松散的泥土、周圍生長的植物，甚至動物會打擾它。
可能有很多原因，使很多這樣的光伏板甚至不會持續(xù)5年。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.ltaaa.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處

sysmimas
You mean like thousands other PV parks built around the world?Take Romania for example:most of the PVs are installed in fields,many were built over 10 years ago,and they are still working fine,generating electricity.Of course you have maintenance,but you'll have that fot any kind of energy generation system:

你說的就像全世界建造了成千上萬的光伏公園一樣？以羅馬尼亞為例：大多數(shù)光伏板安裝在田里，許多是10多年前建造的，它們?nèi)匀还ぷ髡＃l(fā)電。當然，你要維護，就像任何類型的能源發(fā)電系統(tǒng)需要的那樣：

acky1
There's panels being developed nowadays that should retain 90%of their efficiency from the day they were made after 50 years.Properly maintained these could last 50+years and still be generating 80-90%of their original output.
That's comparable to coal plants and nuclear plants.
And whenever the panels are decommissioned they can be recycled,most likely going towards newer,more efficient panels.

現(xiàn)在正在開發(fā)的面板應該保持90%的效率，從制造的那天起到50年后。適當維護這些產(chǎn)品可以持續(xù)50多年，但仍能產(chǎn)生原始發(fā)電量的80-90%。
這可與煤廠和核電站相媲美。
每當面板報廢時，它們都可以回收利用，很可能會用于更新、更高效的面板。

Hugh_Mongous_Richard
You realize they built the most nuclear reactors as well right?China leads on most energy categories by a fuckton.They burn the most coal,build the most renewables,and build the most nuclear lmao.

你知道他們也建造了最多的核反應堆，對吧？中國在大多數(shù)能源類別上TMD領(lǐng)先。他們?nèi)紵疃嗟拿禾?，建造最多的可再生能源，建造最多的核電站，笑死我了?/p>

ChrisHisStonks
It's almost like they have the most people,who are also industrializing at the highest rate,requiring breakneck development of their energy grid or something....

這幾乎就像他們擁有最多的人口，他們也在以最高的速度工業(yè)化，需要他們自己的飛速發(fā)展的能源網(wǎng)或其他什么的......

MrWavespur
This comment section urgently needs a waaambulance,but sadly,they're all tied up in ohio.But they're right,America should just continue fracking,the landscape will look so much more beautiful.

這個評論區(qū)急需一輛救護車（拯救一下情緒低落的人），但不幸的是，它們都被綁在了俄亥俄州。但他們是對的，美國應該繼續(xù)水力壓裂（開采石油），風景會看起來更美麗。

mynameismy111
Redditeers think gray dirt hills r beautiful and anything China does is evil seemingly

紅迪主義者認為灰色的土山是美麗的，中國所做的任何事情似乎都是XE的

Good_Juggernaut_3days ago
The scale of public works in China is mind boggling.It’s one of very few examples where a centrally planned economy can produce a positive outcome.

中國公共工程的規(guī)模令人難以置信，這是中央計劃經(jīng)濟能夠產(chǎn)生積極結(jié)果的極少數(shù)例子之一。

ChaosTheoryGlass
Doesn’t seem great for any kind of wildlife living there.

對生活在那里的任何野生動物來說都不是很好。