最美情侣中文字幕电影,在线麻豆精品传媒,在线网站高清黄,久久黄色视频

歡迎光臨散文網(wǎng) 會員登陸 & 注冊

等下就刪

2022-11-28 10:39 作者:影之詩精神病院羅院長  | 我要投稿

只是借用一下b站的專欄功能,儲存一下內(nèi)容,等下就刪。

Note: The student and instructor see this form. These ratings and comments will be part of the final course evaluation. Your constructive feedback and insights will be very helpful for the student.?


Client Company and contact person’s information:


Name(s) of student(s) who worked on your project:


Please provide in your words a brief description of the project you assigned to the student or student group:?


Please rate the following aspects of the project:?


1. On a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the highest mark and most positive, how was your first experience with the team or person? Did they seem enthusiastic about your project or at least about working with you? (This is aside from confidence, as presumably that was gained over the course.)

0-2 Poor Performance

3-5

Needs Improvement

6-7

Not a negative first impression but some key skills should be worked on for future experiences

8-9?

Very good first impression overall with some minor considerations to keep in mind

10 – Excellent

Outstanding. Student (team) was prepared and enthusiastic

Comments:


Score out of? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? /10




2. On a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing the most, (and to the degree the project itself allowed) how would you rate the level of creativity or ingenuity demonstrated in the execution of the project??

0-2?

No or very little initiative or problem solving

3-5

Needs Improvement but signs were there. Could just need more experience.

6-7

Standard level of creativity or ingenuity. Credible but could have used more insight or originality.

8-9?

Very willing to think through and provide ideas based on knowledge of the project and its context: Really committed to problem solving.

10?

Took ownership of the progress and momentum, prepared with fresh ideas and ways to surmount potential obstacles or improve upon status quo.

Comments:


Score out of? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? /10



3. On a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the highest mark, how would you rate the final deliverable relative to the initial assignment? i.e. To what degree did the team deliver what you wanted or expected??

0-2?

Deliverables not provided as expected or are sub-standard in a substantial way. (This does not include deliverables compromised as a result of client situation.)

3-5

Needs Improvement. Either key elements are missing from original scope agreement or there is some effort but simply not up to basic professional standard.

6-7

Solid content or deliverable, in keeping with the scope of work. Nothing more. Nothing less.?

8-9?

Professional submissions that in some way surpass expectations of the scope and client management.

The final project will be used in some form by the client organization.

10

Excellent submission with highly professional presentation and client management. The project deliverables will be used as is by the client organization.

Comments:


Score out of? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? /10




4. On a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the highest mark, how well did the student (team) demonstrate ownership of the project or an entrepreneurial mindset in fulfilling requirements??

0-2?

Poor Performance: Did not demonstrate an understanding or knowledge of client need or define the problem accurately throughout.

3-5

Gave impression of deprioritizing the project though still executing some or all of the work.

6-7

Provided good insight and problem solving but was not open to coaching around improved best practices.

8-9?

Was proactive with ideas and solutions, overcame communication or timing obstacles and provided value add in some way.?

10

Excellent deliverables and outstanding opportunity-seeking.

Comments:


Score out of? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? /10




5. On a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the highest mark, what was the level of professionalism demonstrated by the team? How was it demonstrated?

0-2

Little to no professional aspect to the deliverables or the client relationship.

3-5

Needs Improvement: Did not demonstrate acumen beyond the classroom setting.

6-7

Consistent contact, appropriate momentum and communication with good service orientation.

8-9?

Very service-oriented and open to growing beyond the classroom setting – from studentry to industry.

10

Operated as a professional in the field, providing more than expected or value add of some kind to the client or the project or both. Project will?

Comments:


Score out of? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? /10


Combined mark for student (team) ? ? ?/50



Mentoring Section:

(This section is your opportunity to provide honest commentary on the process and final execution of the agreed-to project.)


1. In a few words, please provide any specific examples or thoughts about your student (team) collaboration with you on this project.?


2. What went well??



3. If you were to provide some final coaching notes to the student or student group, what do you think would be useful for them to learn from this experience? How might the student (team) manage specific challenges or circumstances differently in the future??


等下就刪的評論 (共 條)

分享到微博請遵守國家法律
个旧市| 沁源县| 泸水县| 苏尼特右旗| 云梦县| 临沂市| 泰顺县| 四子王旗| 石柱| 凌云县| 徐州市| 常山县| 外汇| 潜江市| 溧水县| 嘉鱼县| 呼伦贝尔市| 托克托县| 佳木斯市| 钟山县| 土默特左旗| 桓台县| 成安县| 江川县| 卢氏县| 永吉县| 盐城市| 黑水县| 肥乡县| 红桥区| 金塔县| 柳林县| 福安市| 景泰县| 岱山县| 澄迈县| 永平县| 青河县| 湘西| 邯郸市| 博野县|