【SCI審稿意見學(xué)習(xí)】兒科骨髓移植的藥代動力學(xué)和藥效學(xué)模型
Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Modelling in Paediatric Bone Marrow Transplantation
兒科骨髓移植的藥代動力學(xué)和藥效學(xué)模型
the title is informative
Abstract :background is well written but a thor structures seem to be missed References : Need to be updated and relative to subject of review.
Introduction is clear what already known about this topic but, un relevant information are mentioned. The research question should be clearly outlined and need to be justified to what known about the subject. The gap of information is not well presented
The article had no methodology context. general description for types of models have been highlighted only.
The article is review type with no results to review
The author discuss the models from different aspects ,reaching to the acceptable model according to the subject . However ,study limitation inadequately presented. No conclusion paragraph found.
Over all, the article not clearly answer the aim,the major flows were absence of structures like (introduction ,background, method ,discussion and conclusion ). The article need to be more consistent within itself.
標(biāo)題是有益的
摘要:背景寫得很好,但似乎遺漏了參考文獻:需要更新和相對于審查主題。
簡介很清楚,對此主題已經(jīng)知道了什么,但是提到了無關(guān)的信息。研究問題應(yīng)明確概述,需要證明對該主題的了解。信息差距沒有很好地呈現(xiàn)
本文沒有方法論。僅突出顯示了模型類型的一般描述。
本文是評論類型,沒有結(jié)果
作者討論了不同方面的模型,并根據(jù)主題達(dá)到可接受的模型。但是,研究局限性不足。找不到結(jié)論段落。
總體而言,這篇文章尚未清楚地回答目標(biāo),主要流量是缺乏(介紹,背景,方法,討論和結(jié)論)等結(jié)構(gòu)。本文本身需要更加一致。