?But I want to make it clear at all times that like, look, you know, we don't know all the answers and I don't think we're ever going to reach a point where we're like, wow, and there you go. That's the universe. It's this equation. You plug in some conditions or whatever and you do the math and you know what's going to happen tomorrow. I don't think we're ever going to reach that point.

?

但是我想讓所有人都知道，就像，你看，我們不知道所有的答案，我不覺得我們會到達一個點，就像，哇，這就是宇宙。這是方程。你添加一些條件或?whatever?之后，進行數(shù)學計算，你知道明天會發(fā)生什么。我不覺得我們會到達那個點。

?

But I I think that there is a tendency to sometimes believe in science and become elitist and become, I don't know, hard when in reality it should humble you and make you feel smaller.?I think there's something very beautiful about feeling very, very small and very weak and to feel that you need other people. So I try to keep that in mind and say, look, thanks for watching. Vsauce is not I'm not Vsauce. You are. When I start the episodes, I say, hey, Vsauce, Michael here. Vsauce and Michael are actually a different thing in my mind. I don't know if that's always clear.

?

但我認為有時人們會相信科學，變得精英主義，并且有時可能會變得困難，但實際上這應該讓你感到謙遜并讓你感覺更小。我認為感受非常小、非常弱并且需要其他人是非常美好的。所以我試圖記住這一點，并說，看，謝謝你觀看。Vsauce并不是我，我不是Vsauce。你是。當我開始劇集時，我會說，嘿，Vsauce,Michael在這里。Vsauce和Michael實際上是不同的事物，我不知道這是否總是清晰明了。

?

But yeah, I have to approach it that way because it's not about me. Yeah. So it's not even you're not feeling the responsibility. You're just sort of plugging into this big thing that is scientific exploration of our reality. And you're a voice that represents a bunch. But you're just plugging into this big Vsauce ball that others, millions of others are plugged into.

?

然并卵，我這樣做是因為我并不是主角。這并不意味著你沒有責任感。你只是在某種程度上進入了這個巨大的項目——對我們的現(xiàn)實進行科學探索。你是一個代表一群的聲音。但你只是進入了其他人——數(shù)百萬其他人所進入的大Vsauce球。

?

Yeah. And I'm just hoping to encourage curiosity and, you know, responsible thinking and an embracement of of doubt and being OK with that. So next week, talking to Christos Goodrow, I'm not sure if you're familiar who he is, but he's the VP of engineering, head of the quote unquote YouTube algorithm or the search and discovery. Yeah. Let me ask first high level. Do you have do you have a question for him that if you can get an honest answer that you would ask But more generally, how do you think about the YouTube algorithm that drives some of the motivation behind No. Some of the design decisions you make as you ask and answer some of the questions you do.

?

是的，我只是想希望鼓勵好奇心，認真負責的思考，并接受懷疑，沒問題。所以下周與克里斯托弗·戈德沃恩交談，我不知道他是誰，但他是工程VP,YouTube算法或搜索和發(fā)現(xiàn)負責人。是的，讓我首先問一些問題。你有問他的問題嗎？如果你能夠得到誠實的回答，你會問他的。但更一般地，你如何看待YouTube算法，它驅(qū)動某些動機，你提問和回答問題時做出的設計決策。

?

?How would you improve this algorithm in your mind in general So it's just what would you ask him And outside of that, how would you like to see the algorithm improve Well, I think of the algorithm as a mirror. It reflects what people put in. And we don't always like what we see in that mirror. From the individual mirror to the individual mirror to the society. Both in the aggregate, it's reflecting back what people on average want to watch. And when you see things being recommended to you, it's reflecting back what it thinks you want to see.

?

?您會在一般意義上如何改進這個算法呢？因此，您會問他，然后除了算法本身，您還希望它如何改進？
我將其視為鏡子。它反映人們投入的內(nèi)容。但我們并不總是喜歡在鏡子里看到的內(nèi)容。從個體鏡子到個體鏡子到社會，它們的總和反映人們平均想要觀看的內(nèi)容。當你看到東西被推薦給你時，它反映的正是它認為您想要看到的內(nèi)容。

?

And specifically, I would guess that it's not just what you want to see, but what you will click on and what you will watch some of and stay on YouTube because of. I don't think that this is all me guessing, but I don't think that YouTube cares if you only watch like a second of a video. As long as the next thing you do is open another video. If you close the app or close the site, that's a problem for them because they're not a subscription platform. They're not like, look, you're giving us 20 bucks a month no matter what.

?

此外，我猜測這不僅僅是你希望看到的內(nèi)容，而是點擊的內(nèi)容和觀看的一些內(nèi)容，以及留在YouTube的原因。我不是說這完全是猜測，但我認為YouTube不會關心你只觀看了幾分鐘的視頻。只要接下來你做的事情是打開另一個視頻。如果你關閉應用程序或關閉網(wǎng)站，那就是他們的一個問題，因為他們不是一個訂閱平臺。他們不像，看看，無論你做什么，我們都給你20美元。

?

?So who cares They need you to watch and spend time there and see ads. So one of the things I'm curious about, whether they do consider longer term sort of develop your longer term development as a human being, which I think ultimately will make you feel better about using YouTube in the long term and allowing you to stick with it for longer. Because even if you feed the dopamine rush in the short term and you keep clicking on cat videos, the eventually you sort of wake up like from a drug and say, I need to quit this.

?

所以，誰在乎呢？他們需要觀看并花費時間，然后在YouTube上查看廣告。所以，我好奇的一件事情是，他們是否考慮長期發(fā)展人類作為人類的存在。我認為，最終這將會讓你在使用YouTube的長期來看感覺更好，并讓你更長時間的堅持下去。即使你在短期內(nèi)享受多巴胺?rush，最終你也許會像從毒品中醒來一樣，說，我需要停止這個。

?

?So I wonder how much they're trying to optimize for the long term. Because when I look at the, you know, your videos aren't exactly sort of no offense, but they're not the most clickable. They're both the most clickable. And I feel I watch the entire thing and I feel a better human after I watched it. Right. So like they're not just optimizing for the click ability. Because this is I hope. So my thought is, how do you think of it And does it affect your own content Like how deep you go, how profound you explore the directions and so on.

?

我想知道他們是否在長期中試圖優(yōu)化。因為我看，你的視頻并不是故意的，但它們并不是最吸引人的。它們都是最吸引人的?？赐暾麄€視頻后，我感到自己變得更是人類了，對嗎？所以，它們并不是僅僅為了點擊能力而優(yōu)化。我希望這是真的。所以我的思考是，你怎么看它，它對你的內(nèi)容有何影響，比如你深入探索的方向，你挖掘的深度等等

?

?I've been really lucky in that I don't. Worry too much about the algorithm. I mean, look at my thumbnails. I don't really go too wild with them. And with minefield, where I'm in partnership with YouTube on the thumbnails, I'm often like, let's pull this back. Let's be mysterious. Usually I'm just trying to do what everyone else is not doing. So if everyone's doing crazy Photoshop, what kind of thumbnails I'm like, what if the thumbnails just align And what if the title is just a word And I kind of feel like all of the Vsauce channels have cultivated an audience that expects that.

?

我運氣比較好，我沒有過度擔心算法。我的意思是，看看我的摘要。我并沒有真的去過分使用它們。與我面臨的障礙有關，我在摘要上與YouTube合作，我常常想，我們要停止這一切，保持神秘。通常我只是試圖做其他人都不做的事情。所以如果每個人都在瘋狂做?Photoshop，我是怎樣的摘要，如果摘要只是對齊，如果標題只是一個詞，我似乎感覺所有?Vsauce?頻道都培養(yǎng)了期望這種情況的觀眾。

?

And so they would rather Jake make a video that's just called stains. Than one called I explored stains. Shocking. But there are other audiences out there that want that. And I think most people kind of want what you see the algorithm favoring, which is mainstream traditional celebrity and news kind of information. I mean, that's what makes YouTube really different than other streaming platforms. No one's like, what's going on in the world I'll open up Netflix to find out. But you do open up Twitter to find that out.

?

所以他們更愿意讓Jake?制作一個名為“ Stains”的視頻，而不是名為“I Explored Stains”的視頻。這讓人震驚。但還有很多觀眾想要那種被算法青睞的內(nèi)容，也就是傳統(tǒng)的名人和新聞資訊。我想說的是，這就是?YouTube?與其他流媒體平臺真正不同之處。沒人會想要打開?Netflix?來了解世界的情況，但確實有人想要打開?Twitter?來了解那些被算法青睞的內(nèi)容。

?

?You open up Facebook and you can open up YouTube because you'll see that the trending videos are like what happened amongst the traditional mainstream people in different industries. And that's what's being shown. And it's it's not necessarily YouTube saying we want that to be what you see. It's that that's what people click on when they see Ariana Grande, you know, reads a love letter from like her high school sweetheart. They're like, I want to see that. And when they see a video from me that's got some lines in math and it's called Law and Causes, they're like,

?

打開Facebook和打開YouTube，因為你會看到流行趨勢的視頻就像不同行業(yè)傳統(tǒng)主流人士發(fā)生的一樣。這就是被展示的。這并不意味著YouTube希望觀眾看到的內(nèi)容是你所看到的。這是指當人們看到Ariana Grande讀取她的高中情人的情書時，他們會點擊，就像他們想要看到那樣。當他們看到我從數(shù)學中畫出的一些線條并被稱為法律和原因的視頻時，他們會說，

?

?well, I mean, that I'm just on the bus. Like, I don't have time to dive into a whole lesson. So, you know, before you get super mad at YouTube, you should say, really, they're just reflecting back human behavior. Is there something you would improve about the algorithm Knowing, of course, that as far as we're concerned, it's a black box, so we don't know how it works. Right. And I don't think that even anyone at YouTube really knows what it's doing. They know what they've tweaked, but then it learns. I think that it learns and it decides how to behave. And sometimes they're the YouTube employees are left going,

?

我的意思是，我只是站在一輛公交車上。比如，我沒有足夠的時間來深入學習整個課程。所以，你知道的，在你對YouTube憤怒之前，你應該說，真的，它們只是反映人類的行為。你能改進算法哪些方面，當然，我們對它是一臺黑盒子，所以不知道它是如何工作的。對。我甚至認為，即使YouTube的員工也不清楚它在做什么。他們知道他們微調(diào)了什么，但它會繼續(xù)學習。我認為它會繼續(xù)學習并決定如何行為。有時候，YouTube的員工不得不繼續(xù)。

?

?I don't know. Maybe we should change the value of how much it worries about watch time. And maybe it should worry more about something. I don't know. But I mean, I would like to see. I don't know what they're doing and not doing. Well, is there a conversation that you think they should be having just internally, whether they're having it or not Is there something should they be thinking about the long term future Should they be thinking about educational content and whether that's educating about what just happened in the world today, news or educational content like what you're providing, which is asking big, sort of timeless questions about how the way the world works Well, it's interesting.

?

我不知道?；蛟S我們應該改變它對于時間擔憂的價值?；蛟S它應該更多擔憂一些事情。我不知道。但我的意思是，我希望能看到。我不知道他們在做什么。那是否有內(nèi)部的對話，是否他們正在內(nèi)部進行。是否有一些關于長期未來的思考。是否他們正在思考今天世界所發(fā)生的事情，新聞，或者像你所提供的內(nèi)容，提出一些大而永恒的關于世界運作方式的問題。這很有趣。

?

What should they think about Because it's called YouTube, not our tube. And that's why I think they have so many phenomenal educational creators. Yes. You don't have shows like Three Blue One Brown or Physics Girl or Looking Glass Universe or Up and Atom or Brain Scoop or. I mean, I could go on and on. They aren't on Amazon Prime and Netflix, and they don't have commissioned shows from those platforms. It's all organically happening because there are people out there that want to share their passion for learning, that want to share their curiosity, and YouTube could, you know, promote those kinds of shows more.

?

他們應該如何看待YouTube。它被稱為YouTube，而不是我們的tube。這就是為什么我認為它們擁有眾多教育創(chuàng)作者的原因。是的，你并沒有像Three Blue One Brown、物理學女孩、Glass Universe、Up和 Atom、腦 Scoop或類似的節(jié)目。我的意思是，我可以繼續(xù)列舉下去。它們并不在亞馬遜prime和Netflix上，它們也沒有從這些平臺上的委托節(jié)目。這一切都 organic 地發(fā)生，因為世界上有人想分享他們的學習熱情，分享他們的好奇，YouTube 可以更多地推廣這種類型的節(jié)目。

?

?But like, first of all. They probably wouldn't get as many clicks, and YouTube needs to make sure that the average user is always clicking and staying on the site. They could still promote it more for the good of society. But then we're making some really weird claims about what's good for society, because I think that cat videos are also an incredibly important part of what it means to be a human. I mentioned this quote before from Uno Muno about, look, I've seen a cat like estimate distances and calculate a jump, you know, more often than I've seen a cat cry. And so things that that play with our emotions and make us feel things can be cheesy and can feel cheap. But like, man, that's very human.

?

不過，首先，它們可能不會像以前那樣引起更多的點擊，YouTube需要確保普通用戶總是點擊并保持在網(wǎng)站上。他們?nèi)匀豢梢愿嗟赝茝V這門課程，為社會作出貢獻。但是，我們在關于對社會作出貢獻的問題上提出了一些非常奇怪的觀點，因為我認為貓視頻也是人類的一部分，也就是人類的一個重要組成部分。我之前提到了Uno Muno中的這段話，就像我之前提到的，我曾經(jīng)見過一只貓估算距離并計算跳躍，比看到一只貓哭泣的次數(shù)更多。因此，那些會玩弄我們的情感并讓我們感受到事物的東西可能會變得虛假并且感覺低廉，但是，人，這真的很人類。

?

?And so even the dumbest vlog is still so important that I don't think it I have a better claim to take its spot than it has to have that spot. So it puts a mirror to us, the beautiful parts, the ugly parts, the shallow parts, the deep parts. You're right. What I would like to see is, you know, I I miss the days when engaging with content on YouTube helped push it into my subscribers timelines. It used to be that when I liked a video, say from Veritasium, it would show up in the feed on the front page of the app or the website of my subscribers.

?

所以你即使是最愚蠢的視頻也仍然非常重要，我認為它不應該有任何權利占據(jù)這個 spot，而應該讓這個位置屬于它。所以它給我們展示了我們美麗的部分、丑陋的部分、膚淺的部分和深刻的部分。你是正確的，我希望看到那些視頻，比如 Veritasium 的視頻，它們可以在應用程序首頁或我的訂閱者網(wǎng)站上出現(xiàn)。曾經(jīng)，當我喜歡一個視頻時，它會出現(xiàn)在應用程序首頁或我的訂閱者網(wǎng)站上的推薦 feed 中。

?

And I knew that if I liked a video, I could send it 100,000 views or more. That no longer is true. But I think that was a good user experience. When I subscribe to someone, when I'm following them, I want to see more of what they like. I want them to also curate the feed for me. And I think that Twitter and Facebook are doing that in also some ways that are kind of annoying. But I would like that to happen more.

?

我還知道，如果我喜歡一個視頻，我可以發(fā)送它達到100,000或更多的 views。這已經(jīng)不再是事實了。但我認為這是一個良好的用戶體驗。當我訂閱某個人時，當我跟蹤他們時，我想看到他們更多喜歡的東西。我想他們也為我整理消息。我認為推特和Facebook也在一些方式上這樣做，這有些令人討厭。但我希望這種情況更多發(fā)生。

?

?And I think we would see communities being stronger on YouTube if it was that way instead of YouTube going, well, technically, Michael liked this Veritasium video, but people are way more likely to click on Carpool Karaoke. So I don't even care who they are. Just give them that. Not saying anything against Carpool Karaoke. That is a extremely important part of our society. What it means to be a human on Earth. You know, but I'll say it sucks. But but a lot of people would disagree with you. And they should be able to see as much of that as they want. And even people who don't think they like it should still be really aware of it, because it's such an important thing and such an influential thing.

?

"還有，技術上，Michael喜歡這個Veritasium視頻，但人們更有可能點擊車間卡拉OK。所以，我連他們是誰都不在乎。只要給他們這些。不能說任何反對車間卡拉OK的事情。這是現(xiàn)代社會的一個極其重要的部分。人類在地球上意味著什么。你知道，但我會說它很糟糕。但很多人會不同意你。他們應該能夠想要什么就得到什么。甚至那些認為不喜歡它的人也應該非常意識到它，因為它是如此重要和有影響力的事情。"

?

?But yeah, I just wish that like new channels I discover and that I subscribe to. I wish that my subscribers found out about that, because especially in the education community, a rising tide floats all boats. If you watch a video from Numberphile, you're just more likely to want to watch an episode from me, whether it be on Vsauce1 or Ding. It's not it's not competitive in the way that traditional TV was, where it's like, well, if you tune into that show, it means you're not watching mine because they both air at the same time.

?

但是我僅僅是希望我能發(fā)現(xiàn)新的頻道并訂閱它們，因為我希望能讓 我的訂閱者們知道這些頻道，特別是在教育社區(qū)中，趨勢推動一切。如果你觀看 Numberphile 的視頻，你更有可能觀看我的劇集，無論是在 Vsauce1 還是 Ding 上觀看。這并不像傳統(tǒng)電視那樣具有競爭關系，就像你可能會選擇觀看那個節(jié)目而不是我的，因為它們同時播出。

?

?So helping each other out through collaborations takes a lot of work. But just through engaging, commenting on their videos, liking their videos, subscribing to them, whatever that I would love to see become easier and more powerful. So a quick and impossibly deep question. Last question about mortality. You've spoken about death as an interesting topic. Do you think about your own mortality Yeah, every day. It's really scary. So what do you think is the meaning of life that mortality makes very explicit So why are you here on Earth, Michael What's the point of this whole thing What You know, what does mortality in the context of the whole universe make you realize about yourself Just you, Michael Stevens Well, it makes me realize that I am destined to become a notion. I'm destined to become a memory and we can extend life.

?

因此通過合作互相幫助需要花費很多時間和精力。但僅僅是互動、評論他們的視頻、喜歡他們的視頻、訂閱他們，我就希望能讓這些感覺變得更加輕松和更強大。所以這是一個快速而深刻的問題。最后一個問題是關于死亡的。你曾經(jīng)將死亡視為一個有趣的話題。你想過自己的死亡嗎？每天都想。這真的好可怕。所以你認為生命的意義是什么，死亡 makes it very explicit，所以為什么你會來到這個世界，Michael，這整個事情的目的是什么？你知道，在整個宇宙中，死亡的意味著什么？僅僅是你，Michael Stevens，它讓我意識到，我注定要成為概念。我注定要成為回憶，我們可以延長生命。

?

?I think there's really exciting things being done to extend life, but we we still don't know how to, like, you know, protect you from some accident that could happen, you know, some unforeseen thing. Maybe we could like save my connectome and like recreate my consciousness digitally. But even that could it could be lost if it's stored on a physical medium or something. So basically, I just think that. Embracing and realizing how cool it is that, like, someday I will just be an idea and there won't be a Michael anymore that can be like, no, that's not what I meant. It'll just be what people like they have to guess what I meant. And they'll remember me. And how I live on as that memory will will maybe not even be who I wanted to be.

?

在我看來，延長壽命確實令人興奮，但我們?nèi)匀徊恢涝撊绾伪Ｗo你避免可能發(fā)生的事情，比如一些意想不到的事情。也許我們可以保存你的基因連接，數(shù)字化重建你的意識，但這也有可能失去，如果你存儲在物理媒介上或者一些未知的事物中。所以，我只是覺得，接受并意識到，就像，有一天我將只是想法，不再有一個邁克爾，不會再有那種令人激動的，令人興奮的感覺了，不對，那并不是我的意思。它只是一種人們猜測我真正想要表達的東西。他們會記住我，我會繼續(xù)生活，就像那個記憶可能并不是我想成為的人。

?

?But there's something powerful about that and there's something powerful about letting future people run the show themselves. I think I I'm glad to get out of their way at some point and say, all right, it's your world now. So you, the physical entity, Michael, has have ripple effects in the space of ideas that far outlives you. Yeah. In ways that you can't control. But it's nevertheless fascinating to think, I mean, especially with you. You can imagine an alien species when they finally arrive and destroy. All of us would watch your videos to try to figure out what were the questions. But even if they didn't, you know, I still think that there will be ripples like when I say memory, I don't specifically mean people remember my name and my birthdate and have like there's a photo of me on Wikipedia. Like all that can be lost.

?

但是它有一種強大的力量，讓未來的人們自己來掌控這個世界。我認為我很樂意在某些時候擺脫他們的控制，說，好吧，現(xiàn)在輪到你了。因此，你作為一個實體，邁克爾，在思想空間中產(chǎn)生了深遠的影響，這比你的生命更為持久。是的，以一種你無法控制的方式。但我仍然感到著迷，特別是與你在一起的時候。你可以想象一個外星種族最終到達并摧毀我們的世界。我們會觀看你的視頻，試圖找出這些問題。但即使他們沒有解決這些問題，你知道，我仍然認為會有些漣漪，就像當我說記憶時，我并不是指人們記得我的名字和出生日期，就像在維基百科上存在一張我的圖片。所有這些都是可以失去的。

?

But I still would hope that people ask questions and teach concepts in some of the ways that I have found useful and satisfying. Even if they don't know that I was the one who tried to popularize it. That's fine. But if Earth was completely destroyed, like burnt to a crisp, everything on it today, what would what the universe wouldn't care Like Jupiter is not going to go, oh, no. And that could happen. That could so we do, however, have the power to, you know, launch things into space, to try to extend how long our memory exists. And what I mean by that is, you know, we are recording things about the world and we're learning things and writing stories and all of this and preserving that is truly what I think is the essence of being a human. We are. Autobiographers of the universe, and we're really good at it. We're better than fossils. We're better than light spectrum. We're better than any of that.

?

我仍然希望人們能夠以我找到的有用和令人滿意的方式提出問題，教授概念。即使他們不知道我是試圖推廣它的人。沒關系。但如果地球被完全摧毀，就像燒焦一樣，今天的一切，宇宙不會在意，就像木星不會動，哦，不，那可能會發(fā)生。那可能會發(fā)生。我們可以這樣做，但也可以發(fā)射物品進入太空，試圖延長我們的記憶的持續(xù)時間。我的意思是，我們正在記錄世界的事情，學習東西，寫故事，所有這一切，并保存它，真正我認為是人類的本質(zhì)。我們是宇宙的自傳體，我們做得很好。我們比化石好。我們比光頻好。我們比任何形式的都好。

?

?We collect much more detailed memories of what's happening, much better data. And so that should be our legacy. And I hope that that's that's kind of mine, too, in terms of people remembering something or having some kind of effect. But even if I don't, you can't not have an effect. That's not me feeling like I hope that I have this powerful legacy. It's like no matter who you are, you will. But you also have to embrace. The fact that that impact might look really small and that's OK. One of my favorite quotes is from Tessa, the D'Urbervilles, and it's along the lines of the measure of your life depends on not your external displacement, but your subjective experience.

?

我們收集了更詳細的關于正在發(fā)生的事情的記憶，更好的數(shù)據(jù)。所以，這應該成為我們的遺產(chǎn)。我希望這也能是我的遺產(chǎn)，從人們記得某些事情或產(chǎn)生影響這方面來說。但即使我不記，你也可以沒有影響。這并不是我希望擁有這樣強大的遺產(chǎn)的感覺。就像無論你是誰，你都會擁有影響。但它也要求你擁抱這個影響可能看起來很小的事實。我最喜歡的引用來自《德伯維爾的故事》，它的意思是，生命的衡量不僅取決于外在的流離失所，也取決于你的主觀體驗。

?

?If I am happy and those that I love are happy. Can that be enough Because if so, excellent. I think there's no better place to end it, Michael. Thank you so much. It was an honor to meet you. Thanks for talking to me. Thank you. It was a pleasure. Thanks for listening to this conversation with Michael Stevens. And thank you to our presenting sponsor, Cash App. Download it. Use code Lex Podcast. You'll get $10 and $10 will go to first a STEM education nonprofit that inspires hundreds of thousands of young minds to learn, to dream of engineering our future. If you enjoy this podcast, subscribe on YouTube. Give it five stars on Apple Podcast. Support on Patreon or connect with me on Twitter. And now let me leave you with some words of wisdom from Albert Einstein. The important thing is not to stop questioning. Curiosity has its own reason for existence. One cannot help but be in awe when he contemplates the mysteries of eternity, of life, the marvelous structure of reality. It is enough if one tries merely to comprehend a little of this mystery every day. Thank you for listening and hope to see you next time.

?

如果我感到快樂，并且我所愛的人也感到快樂，那是否可以足夠呢？如果是這樣，那太好了。我認為最好的結束方式是沒有其他更好的地方可以結束，Michael。非常感謝你的到來。見到你很高興。感謝你與我交談。非常感謝。很高興能與你聽這個對話。下載并使用Lex Podcast代碼。你會得到10美元，而這10美元將用于支持STEM教育非營利組織，激發(fā)數(shù)千年輕人學習、夢想創(chuàng)造我們的未來。如果喜歡這個 Podcast，可以在YouTube訂閱。在蘋果 Podcast 上給它打5星。在 Patreon 上支持，或在Twitter上與我互動?，F(xiàn)在讓我留下一些Albert Einstein的智慧。重要的是不要停止提問。好奇有其存在的原因。當你思考永恒的問題、生命的奧秘、現(xiàn)實奇妙的結構時，你一定會感到敬畏。只要每天嘗試理解一點點這些奧秘，就已經(jīng)夠了。非常感謝你聽這個對話，希望下次還能與你見面。