正文翻譯

Imran Roy, Science Journalist
None. Humans would continue to rule the world regardless.
Humans have not been ruling the planet for the last 150 centuries due to intelligence alone. No my friend, it has to do with a lot more than just intellect and brains.
Here is a list of some of the critical advantages which we humans have and other creatures just don’t have at all.

毫無疑問，人類會繼續(xù)統(tǒng)治世界。
在過去的150個世紀(jì)里，人類之所以能統(tǒng)治地球可不僅僅只是因?yàn)橹橇υ蚨选?br>不，我的朋友，動物不可能統(tǒng)治地球，因?yàn)檫@個問題也不僅僅只與大腦有關(guān)。
我在這里列出了一些只為我們?nèi)祟愃鶕碛校渌飰焊蜎]有的關(guān)鍵優(yōu)勢。

3.Body posture
We humans can stand upright and can sit and lie in a variety of postures. This enables us to ride vehicles and fly aircraft. Even if other animals obtained human level intellect, they would be unable to drive a tank or fly a gunship helicopter due to their body posture.

3.身體姿勢
我們?nèi)祟惪梢灾绷⑿凶?，也可以以各種姿勢或坐或臥，這使得我們能夠乘坐車輛和駕駛飛機(jī)。即使其他動物獲得了人類水平的智力，也會因?yàn)樯眢w的姿勢問題而無法駕駛坦克或者武裝直升機(jī)。

We would simply annihilate any creature which tried to compete with us for world dominance.

我們將輕而易舉地消滅任何試圖與我們爭奪世界主導(dǎo)權(quán)的生物。

評論翻譯

Imran Roy
Best critical analysis of my answer so far!

這是到目前為止，對我的答案所作出的最好的批判性分析!

Christian Melendez
I think the asker did not provide enough details to make any type of reasonable answer. Are we talking about an overnight gain of human intelligence? Did they have time to fully understand what they have gained and put it to use? If this occurred over hundreds of years then your hypothetical gets thrown out the window. If we are talking about an overnight thing then yeah you are probably right.

我認(rèn)為提問者沒有提供足夠的細(xì)節(jié)來做出任何類型的合理回答。這些動物是一夜之間獲得的人類智慧嗎?它們是否有時間充分了解自己得到了什么并加以利用?如果這些動物是在幾百年間逐漸獲了可以和人類媲美的智慧，那么你的假設(shè)就被推翻了。如果我們談?wù)摰氖且灰怪g發(fā)生的事情，那么是的，你可能是對的。

Imran Roy
The clue lays in the word “suddenly” which appears in the question statement.

提問的陳述中有“suddenly“（突然 ）一詞。

Imran Roy
Well, to be honest, orcas, blue whales, and sharks already rule more than twice the area we rule (oceans/seas area versus dry land).
If however, it's about land only, I think in the absence of primates, it would be obvious: feline predators. Tigers, leopards, lions, and jaguars would make pacts of non-interference and continue to enjoy their reign over the herbivores.

好吧，說實(shí)話，虎鯨、藍(lán)鯨和鯊魚的統(tǒng)治面積已經(jīng)超過了我們統(tǒng)治面積的兩倍（海洋面積與陸地）。
然而，如果只涉及陸地，我想在沒有靈長類動物的情況下，答案會很明顯：貓科動物掠食者?；?、豹、獅和美洲豹會簽訂互不干涉條約，繼續(xù)享受它們對這些食草動物的統(tǒng)治。

Imran Roy
I’m afraid you are contradicting yourself here.
At one time you say animals could develop a complex series of grunts and howls which could convey abstract ideas that are incomprehensible to humans.
And in the very next paragraph, you state that “when a tiger speaks, you LISTEN!”
Are you implying that tigers would suddenly develop human speech or would humans be able to understand those incomprehensible growls and squeaks which were previously illegible?

恐怕你在這里是自相矛盾的。
你一邊說，動物可以發(fā)展出一系列復(fù)雜的叫聲和吼聲，可以傳達(dá)人類無法理解的抽象思想。
然后你又說， "當(dāng)老虎說話的時候，你只有聽著！"
你是在暗示老虎會突然發(fā)展出人類的語言，還是說人類能夠聽懂那些以前難以理解的吼叫和吱吱聲？

Keigan O'Grady
The sole factor that keeps monkeys from speaking is the size of their brain
If they were as smart as humans, invented a language we didn't understand, and figured out how cellphones worked. They could plan a biological attack that spans across the world. By having a few monkeys simultaneously infect the unguarded shared water sources of the poorer countries, the infection would then spread to the richer countries.
For them to have any kind of chance tho it would have to be an antibiotic-resistant superbug.

猴子不會說話的唯一原因是它們的大腦還是太小。
如果他們和人類一樣聰明，發(fā)明了一種我們不懂的語言，甚至能知道手機(jī)的工作原理。那他們就可以策劃一場席卷全世界的生物攻擊。讓幾只猴子去感染較貧窮國家無人看管的共享水源，然后感染就會蔓延到較富裕的國家。
如果他們要想有任何機(jī)會的話，那就必須是一種具有抗生素耐藥性的超級細(xì)菌。

Imran Roy
Heh. You are forgetting the lovely attack helicopters my friend.
Just one of them with a few guys carrying assault rifles would be enough to wipe them all out from a whole forest within a day or two.

哈哈，你忘了可愛的攻擊直升機(jī)，我的朋友。
只要有一架，再加上幾個扛著突擊步槍的家伙，就足以在一兩天內(nèi)把它們從整片森林里全部消滅。

Patrick Dieter
We’d have to know what they planned first, or we wouldn’t bother to do that. Many animals have great stealth as an attribute.

我們必須事先知道他們的計劃，否則我們就不會去做這些事情。很多動物的行為都有很強(qiáng)的隱蔽性。

Christopher Knight
I feel that this answer assumes that the war would take place the second the rest of the animal kingdom obtained human intelligence. If given the time to create tools, machines, and weaponry that is built bespoke for their own respective anatomies then there’s no reason to believe that they couldn’t engineer their own helicopters, auto rifles, and tanks as well as their own forms of complex methods of communication.
The only way to make this war is fair to the question is to either allow time for our rivals to use their newly gained intelligence to develop their own technologies; or to strip us of our existing technology so that we all fight, with equal intelligence, without a premade arsenal of tools and weaponry. The former would be our best bet. The latter would see our very rapid demise.

我覺得這個答案假設(shè)了戰(zhàn)爭會在其他動物獲得人類智慧的那一秒發(fā)生。如果給他們時間去創(chuàng)造工具、機(jī)器和武器，為他們各自的解剖結(jié)構(gòu)量身打造，那么沒有理由相信他們不能設(shè)計出自己的直升機(jī)、自動步槍和坦克，以及他們自己的復(fù)雜通訊方式形式。
公平對待這場戰(zhàn)爭的唯一方法是要么給我們的對手時間，讓他們利用新獲得的知識開發(fā)自己的技術(shù);或者剝奪我們現(xiàn)有的技術(shù)，這樣我們就可以在沒有現(xiàn)成工具和武器的情況下，以平等的智慧進(jìn)行戰(zhàn)斗。前者是我們最好的選擇。后者將見證我們的迅速滅亡。

Michael Ng
you're assuming animals need to depend on modern age human science to win. Humans require that because they're weaker.
Animals don't even have to reveal that they've gained this intelligence. They can covertly plot to usurp you, and you would not even know it. Human reliance on technology is also their weakness. If your shelters get sabotaged, the state of your well being, as well as your machinery, will deteriorate. Humans cannot win in a battle of attrition against the animal kingdom.
You have to consider that if you're warring against all animals, you will have trouble keeping them as a food source. This means more resources spent on maintaining slaves as well as space and resources for plant farming, which are also extremely vulnerable to sabotage due to the strict environment required to maintain crops.
There are many other war factors where we're absolutely crippled. You would not be able to use ships, because marine life far surpasses the number of ships and torps you can muster. They will get obliterated. That means you also don't have carriers or ship transport. You can attempt to poison them and destroying your own water supply.
You can try to air transport, but even one bird kamikaze into your engine can wreck your plane. They have lots of birds and you don't have the weapons to deal with flocks. You have no transporting power, and you're defending on all fronts. Good luck with that.
Your way of thinking is just too one dimensional.

你認(rèn)為動物需要依靠現(xiàn)代人類科學(xué)才能獲勝。人類之所以需要科學(xué)技術(shù)是因?yàn)槲覀兲趿恕?br>動物們甚至根本用不著泄露出它們已經(jīng)獲得了這種智力。他們可以秘密策劃篡奪你的權(quán)力，而你對此卻毫不知情。人類對技術(shù)的依賴也是他們的弱點(diǎn)。如果你的庇護(hù)所遭到破壞，你的健康狀況，以及你的機(jī)器，都會惡化。在一場消耗戰(zhàn)中，人類不可能戰(zhàn)勝動物。
你必須考慮到，如果你與所有的動物作戰(zhàn)，你將很難把它們作為食物來源。這就意味著需要更多的資源來管理這些有智慧的“奴隸”，也需要更多的空間和資源來維持植物的生長，而植物的生長也非常容易受到破壞，因?yàn)榫S持作物生長需要嚴(yán)格的環(huán)境。
還有許多其他的戰(zhàn)爭因素會把我們搞死搞殘。你將不能使用船只，因?yàn)楹Ｑ笊锏臄?shù)量遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)超過你可以召集的船只和魚雷的數(shù)量。這些船只會被消滅，這意味著你也沒有航母和船舶運(yùn)輸。你可以嘗試給它們下毒，但這會污染我們自己的水源。
你可以嘗試空運(yùn)，但即使是一只鳥也可以像神風(fēng)特攻隊(duì)一樣鉆進(jìn)你的引擎，破壞你的飛機(jī)。他們有很多鳥，你沒有對付鳥群的武器。你沒有運(yùn)輸能力，而且你要在各個方面進(jìn)行防御。祝你好運(yùn)。
你的思維方式太單一了。

Daniel Wilianto
gaining intelligence doesn’t mean gaining cooperation. tigers wouldn’t work together with gorilla or any other. They would all work independently, heck, they probably go after each other, and ultimately, annihilated by humans.
re-read the question again, the asker talked about some kind of Battle Royale.

獲得智力并不意味著它們會合作。老虎不會和大猩猩或其他動物一起搞事情。它們會各干各的，見鬼，它們甚至可能會互相爭斗，最終被人類消滅。
再讀一遍問題，提問者其實(shí)暗示了某種大逃殺。

Jack Bowie
How can humans rule the world when bacteria are the holders of that title? Hell, we’re but a superorganism whose very existence relies directly upon them. And it’s not passive...we are constantly taking orders from our gut microbiome. Ever had a hankering for something particular? You think ‘you’ produced that thought? Our microbiome will chemically signal when it is in need of nutrients. Later that signal will register in our mind as a thought. We fear, and rightfully so, a (human) extinction-sized asteroid hitting us. You know who will still be here once we’re gone…asteroid or otherwise? Even rogue super-earth colliding and blowing us into pieces probably wouldn’t be enough to kill off all bacteria. Bacteria will survive. They ruled before us. The rule now. They will rule later.

如果細(xì)菌擁有智慧...人類怎么能統(tǒng)治世界？見鬼，我們不過是一種超級有機(jī)體，我們的生存直接依賴于它們。而且這些細(xì)菌并不是被動的......我們一直在接受腸道微生物組的命令。曾經(jīng)對某樣?xùn)|西有特別的嗜好？你認(rèn)為 "你 "產(chǎn)生了這種想法？我們的微生物組會在需要營養(yǎng)物質(zhì)時發(fā)出化學(xué)信號。之后，這個信號會在我們的腦海中變成一種想法。我們害怕，也理所當(dāng)然地害怕，會不會有一顆足以毀滅人類的小行星撞擊地球。你知道的，一旦我們?nèi)祟愊Я?.....誰還會在這里？即使真的哪一天有彗星撞地球，把我們炸成碎片，可能也不足以殺死所有細(xì)菌。細(xì)菌會生存下來的。他們在我們之前就已經(jīng)統(tǒng)治了地球。它們現(xiàn)在是，將來依然是地球的統(tǒng)治者。