★★

①From 1910 to 1913, women suffragists in the United States organized annual parades—activity traditionally conducted by men to proclaim solidarity in some cause—not only as a public expression of suffragist solidarity but also a conscious transgression of the?rules of social order: women’s very presence in the streets challenged traditional notions of femininity and restrictions on women’s conduct. ②While recognizing the parade’s rhetorical force as a vehicle for social change, scholars have recently begun to examine its drawbacks as a form of protest. ③Lumsden characterizes the American suffrage parade as a “double-edged sword”, arguing that women’s efforts to proclaim their solidarity left them open to patronizing commentaryfrom press and public and to organized opposition from antisuffragists.

① ??②

? ? ? ? ?↓

??? ? ? ?③

1. It can be inferred from the passage that men’s and women’s parades were?similar?in that both?細(xì)節(jié)推斷題，間接信息

A.were employed as rhetorical vehicles for social change?沒有證據(jù)/相反

B.were regarded as?violating contemporary standards of public decorum[CJ1]?沒有證據(jù)

C.made participants vulnerable to organized opposition?沒有證據(jù)/無關(guān)

D.were largely ineffective as forms of protest?沒有證據(jù)

E. were intended by their participants?as public declarations of solidarity?符合

?[CJ1]?fitness; orderliness?

2. The passage suggests which of the following about proponents of the “rules of social order?”?間接細(xì)節(jié)信息題，直接對比取反

A.They frowned upon public displays such as parades.?沒有證據(jù)，只是針對女性

B.They had?ulterior[劍2]?motives?for?objecting to women’s participation in suffrage parades.?沒有證據(jù)

C.They formed the?core?of the organized opposition to women suffrage.?沒有證據(jù)

D. They believed that it was unfeminine?for women to march in suffrage parades.?符合

E.They?supported?women’s rights to vote but disapprove some of the methodsthat suffragists employed to gain that right.?沒有證據(jù)

?[劍2]別有用心