為世界之改變的追求所提的問題回到了馬克思《關(guān)于費爾巴哈的提綱》中一句經(jīng)常被引述的話，且我想準確地引述這句話而把它念出來：哲學(xué)家們只是用不同的方式解釋世界，問題在于改變世界。

　　在引證這話并依照這話間，其或忽視這樣的事實，即世界之改變預(yù)先在對世界的構(gòu)思中設(shè)想了這一改變，且對世界的構(gòu)思只能被獲知于對世界有盡量的解釋。就是說，馬克思依賴一個對這世界來說完全特定的解釋，以追求他這一改變。那么因此，這句話暴露出它自己的無根狀態(tài)。它表達了這樣的想法，即哲學(xué)已被確然明說了拋棄,然而在這話的后半句中，未明說的追求卻又為哲學(xué)所預(yù)設(shè)了。

? ? ?The question of the demand for world change gose back to a much quoted sentence of Karl Marx in Theses on Feuerbach. And I want to quote it precisely and read it out:The philosophers have only interpreted world in various ways,the point,however,is to change it.

　　In citing this sentence and by following this sentence, one overlooks the fact that a world change presupposes a change in the conception of the world,and that a conception of the world can only be acquired by an adequate interpretation of the world. That is,Marxs relies on a very specific interpretation of the world in order to demand his change. And therefore,this sentence reveals itself to be unfounded.It gives the impression that philosophy has been decidedly spoken against,while in the second part of the sentence,the unspoken demand for philosophy is presupposed.