Mark Zuckerberg:what you need to know

From?undergraduate?but?one?of?the?newest?members?of?Harvard's?class?of?2006?to?one?of?the?richest?men?in?10,?FaceBook?CEO?Mark?Zuckerberg?is?now?worth?$100?billion?Mark?Zuckerberg?rise?to?Silicon?Valley.?Legend?has?transformed?him?from?said?fighter.?And?all?of?it?has?been?driven?by?one?thing.?He's?always?looking?in?the?rear?view?mirror.?Fair?of?failure.?I?am?proud?to?announce?that?starting?today,?our?company?is?now.?

FaceBook首席執(zhí)行官馬克·扎克伯格?(Mark?Zuckerberg)?從本科但是哈佛大學2006屆的最新成員之一，到10歲的最富有的人之一，現(xiàn)在身價1000億美元，馬克·扎克伯格?(Mark?Zuckerberg)?升入硅谷。傳說使他擺脫了所說的戰(zhàn)斗機。所有這些都是由一件事驅動的。他總是往后面后視鏡看。失敗的公平。我很自豪地宣布，從今天開始，我們公司現(xiàn)在。

At?just?19?years?old,?while?Mark?Zuckerberg's,?Harvard?contemporaries?were?focusing?on?their,?he?invented?FaceBook,?now?part?of?a?technology?empire?with?a?market?value?that?has?exceeded?$1?trillion.?But?since?that?first?huge?success,?he's?learnt?the?hard?way.?The?need?to?build?on?it?and?stay?ahead?is?an?ongoing?drive?to?escape?obsolescence.?That?kind?of?paranoia?is?a?big?part?of?what?drives?him?and?what?drives?his?company.?

年僅19歲的時候，當馬克·扎克伯格?(Mark?Zuckerberg)?的哈佛同時代人專注于他們的時候，他發(fā)明了FaceBook，現(xiàn)在是市值超過1萬億美元的技術帝國的一部分。但是自從第一次取得巨大成功以來，他已經(jīng)學會了艱難的方法。在此基礎上繼續(xù)前進的需要是逃避過時的持續(xù)動力。這種偏執(zhí)狂是驅動他和驅動他的公司的很大一部分。

After?failing?to?buy?Twitter,?now?known?as?X?for?$500?million?in?2008,?he?saw?it?grow?into?arrival?with?over?100?million?users.?And?when?the?internet?shifted?to?mobile?in?2011,?FaceBook?was?again?too?slow?to?adapt.?So?when?Twitter?tried?to?buy?new?kid?on?the?block,?Instagram,?Zuckerberg?was?forced?to?act,?snapping?it?up.?But?what?then??Seems?like?an?eye?watering?$1?billion.?He's?always?looking?ahead?to?try?and?see?if?his?company?can?stay?ahead?of?the?curve?today.?The?pace?at?which?the?company?moves?is?breathtaking.?Thought?today?by?FaceBook?for?$1?billion.?The?social?media?Muhammad?is?by?WhatsApp.?

在2008年以5億美元的價格收購了現(xiàn)在被稱為X的Twitter之后，他看到它已經(jīng)成長為擁有超過1億用戶的Twitter。當互聯(lián)網(wǎng)在2011年轉向移動時，F(xiàn)aceBook再次變得太慢，無法適應。因此，當Twitter試圖在Instagram上購買新孩子時，扎克伯格被迫采取行動，搶購了它。但是然后呢？似乎令人垂涎的10億美元。他總是向前看，試圖看看他的公司今天能否保持領先地位。公司的發(fā)展速度令人嘆為觀止。今天被FaceBook認為是10億美元。社交媒體穆罕默德?(Muhammad)?由WhatsApp提供。

Every?time?Mark?Zuckerberg's?arrival,?he?seems?to?either?try?to?buy?it?or?if?you?can't?buy?it,?he?tries?to?copy?it.?When?Mark?Zuckerberg?spotted?that?SnapChat?stories?very?soon,?we?saw?Instagram?stories?with?TikTok.?Meta?has?followed?up?with?a?product?called?Reels,?which?is?a?almost?identical?vertical?short?video?format?on?Instagram?and?FaceBook?and?matters.?

每當馬克·扎克伯格?(Mark?Zuckerberg)?到達時，他似乎要么試圖購買它，要么如果您買不到它，他就試圖復制它。當馬克·扎克伯格很快發(fā)現(xiàn)SnapChat的故事時，我們看到了TikTok的Instagram故事。Meta隨后推出了一款名為Reels的產品，該產品在Instagram和FaceBook和matters上幾乎是相同的垂直短視頻格式。

New?app?threads?bears?a?spooky?resemblance?to?X?Hi?Im?an?avatar?of?Alex?who?directed?this?film.?If?youre?enjoying?watching?it,?you?might?be?interested?to?know?that?Economist?subscribers?get?access?to?a?wealth?of?global?analysis?on?every?conceivable?topic.?You?can?read?it,?you?can?listen?to?it,?you?can?even?be?part?of?it?at?live?webinars?for?the?best?deal?on?a?subscription,?click?on?the?link?and?now?on?with?the?film.?

新的應用線程與執(zhí)導這部電影的亞歷克斯的化身有著怪異的相似之處。如果您喜歡觀看它，您可能會想知道《經(jīng)濟學人》的訂戶可以訪問有關每個可能的主題的大量全球分析。你可以閱讀它，你可以聽它，你甚至可以在直播網(wǎng)絡研討會上參與其中，獲得訂閱的最佳優(yōu)惠，點擊鏈接，現(xiàn)在就看這部電影。

Zuckerberg?drive?to?avoid?obsolescence,?has?created?an?empire?of?communications?acts?with?billions?of?users.?The?thing?is,?Meta?needs?to?make?sure?users?stay?on?its?apps?for?as?long?as?possible,?so?they?see?advertisements?which?make?it?money.?

扎克伯格為了避免過時，創(chuàng)造了一個與數(shù)十億用戶的通信行為帝國。問題是，Meta需要確保用戶在其應用程序上停留的時間盡可能長，這樣他們才能看到賺錢的廣告。

Algorithms?that?keep?people?glued?to?their?screens?made?FaceBook?a?byword?for?misinformation,?and?bio..?Some?of?the?problems?of?toxic?content?online?are?just?a?result?of?what?happens?when?you?get?2?billion?people?together?and?let?them?say?whatever?they?like.?But?that?said,?sometimes?this?move?fast?and?break?things?approach?may?have?resulted?in?weaker?controls?on?content?moderation?than?some?users?might?have?wanted.?Making?the?most?of?those?users?has?come?at?a?cost.?FaceBook?has?been?accused?of?allowing?fake?news?to?propagate,?enabling?interference?in?elections?and?even?ethnic?violence.?And?that's?a?problem?for?FaceBook.?Popularity?is?key?to?its?financial?success.?If?users?go?elsewhere,?it?threatens?advertising?revenue.?

使人們粘在屏幕上的算法使FaceBook成為錯誤信息和生物的代名詞。網(wǎng)上有毒內容的一些問題只是當你把20億人聚集在一起，讓他們想說什么就說什么的結果。但這就是說，有時這種快速和打破事物的方法可能導致對內容審核的控制比某些用戶想要的要弱。充分利用這些用戶是有代價的。FaceBook被指控允許傳播假新聞，從而干預選舉甚至種族暴力。這對FaceBook來說是個問題。受歡迎程度是其財務成功的關鍵。如果用戶去其他地方，則會威脅廣告收入。

In?the?Cambridge?analytic?scandal?exposed?how?lax?FaceBook?had?been?in?guarding?users'?personal?data,?anti?FaceBook?protests?popped?up?all?over?the?world.?Zuckerberg?was?called?to?testify?before?the?US?Congress.?It?was?my?mistake?and.?But?he's?still?trying?to?stay?ahead.?He?set?his?sights?and?so?far?has?spent?$21?billion?on?pushing?the?idea?of?the?metaverse,?an?immersive?virtual?world.?Hey,?are?you?coming??Yeah,?she's?gotta?find?someone.?

在劍橋分析丑聞中，F(xiàn)aceBook一直在保護用戶的個人數(shù)據(jù)方面表現(xiàn)不佳，反FaceBook抗議活動在世界各地涌現(xiàn)。扎克伯格被要求在美國國會作證。這是我的錯誤。但他仍在努力保持領先。他設定了自己的目標，到目前為止，他已經(jīng)花費了210億美元來推動沉浸式虛擬世界metaverse的想法。嘿，你要來嗎？是的，她得找個人。

This?continual?drive?to?escape?obsolescence?and?to?innovate,?I?think,?is?the?main?reason?why?Mark?Zuckerberg?is?investing?so?heavily?in?the?metaverse.?It's?enough?to?have?got?investors?really?annoyed.?They?see?money?leaving?the?company?into?a?project?which?is?unproven?and?which?may?never?return?any?of?that?money.?It's?a?huge?gamble.?It?could?turn?out?to?be?a?wildly?successful?bet,?could?turn?out?to?be?total?waste?of?money.?Skepticism?among?investors?was?what?drove?matters?share?priced?down?by?so?much?in?2022,?Zuckerberg?strives?to?stay?relevant,?may?have?led?matter?into?dangerous?territory,?but?its?share?price?has?rebounded.

我認為，這種逃避過時和創(chuàng)新的持續(xù)動力是馬克·扎克伯格?(Mark?Zuckerberg)?如此大量投資于metaverse的主要原因。讓投資者真的很惱火就足夠了。他們看到錢把公司留在一個未經(jīng)證實的項目中，這個項目可能永遠不會歸還任何錢。這是一場巨大的賭博。這可能是一個非常成功的賭注，可能會完全浪費金錢。投資者的懷疑是導致matters股價在2022年大幅下跌的原因，扎克伯格努力保持相關性，可能導致matter進入危險領域，但其股價已經(jīng)反彈。

When?it?came?to?the?move?to?Mobile,?Mark?Zuckerberg?was?rather?late.?There's?a?risk?now?that?with?the?metaverse,?he?may?be?arriving?too?early.?He?is?helping?to?pave?the?way?and?pay?for?others?to?take?advantage?of?this?technology.?If?it?takes?off?further?down?line.?Despite?the?risks,?Zuckerberg?is?still?intent?on?moving?fast,?and?that?matters.?

當談到轉向移動時，馬克·扎克伯格已經(jīng)相當晚了?，F(xiàn)在有了metaverse，他可能來得太早了。他正在幫助鋪平道路，并為其他人利用這項技術付費。如果它進一步下降。盡管存在風險，扎克伯格仍然決心快速行動，這很重要。

The?world?does?need?to?care?about?what?drives?Mark?Zuckerberg?because?he?controls?the?way?that?a?lot?of?people?get?not?just?their?entertainment,?but?actually?their?news?as?well.?So?what?he?does?and?what?he?thinks?really?matters?to?all?of?us.?Thanks?for?watching.?If?you'd?like?to?read?more?of?The?Economist?coverage?of?Mark?Zuckerberg?and?Big?Tech,?then?click?on?the?link.?And?don't?forget?to?subscribe.?

世界確實需要關心是什么驅使馬克·扎克伯格?(Mark?Zuckerberg)，因為他控制著很多人不僅獲得娛樂，而且實際上也獲得新聞的方式。所以他的所作所為和他的想法對我們所有人都很重要。謝謝你的收看。如果您想閱讀《經(jīng)濟學人》對馬克·扎克伯格和Big?Tech的更多報道，請單擊鏈接。別忘了訂閱。

不要忘記一鍵三連哦，非常感謝~?

文本關注公主號“圓周閱讀Pireading”回復”字幕“即可免費獲得！?