The force which is solicited請(qǐng)求 by another force likewise★同樣地?

is soliciting this other force, which itself thereby becomes a?

soliciting force.

-

What is present within this play is just the immediate flux連續(xù)的改變,?

or the absolute exchange of determinateness which constitutes the?

sole content of what is coming on the scene: to be either a universal?

medium or a negative unity.?

Universal attraction, or the pure concept of law, thereby?

stands over and against determinate確定的 laws. Insofar as this pure?

concept is regarded as the essence, or, the true inner, the?

determinateness itself of determinate laws still belongs to?

appearance, or rather it belongs to sensuous being.

If, positive electricity is posited,

then negative electricity in itself is also necessary, for?

the positive is only as a relation to the negative.

The indifference of law and force,or of concept and being,is present

in yet another way than that already indicated.?

-

In the law of motion, for example, it is necessary that motion

be divided into time and space, or else then into distance and?

velocity★速率. While motion is only the relation of those moments,?

motion, or the universal, is here divided in itself.?

-

However, these parts, time and?

space, or distance and velocity, do not now express in

themselves this origination out of one universal.

-

They are indifferent to each other. Space is represented as being?

able to be without time, time without space, and distance at least?

without velocity – in the same way that their magnitudes★大小/量級(jí) are?

indifferent to each other while they do not relate to each

other as positive and negative and thus are not related to?

each other through their essence.?

motion itself

is not represented as simple essence or as pure essence, but?

rather as already divided.?

-

Time and space are its self-sufficient parts, or essences in themselves,?

or distance and velocity are ways of being or of representational thinking,

where any one of them can be just as well without the other.?

-

Motion is thus only their superficial relation, not their essence.?

Represented as simple essence, or as force, motion is indeed gravity,?

which does not, however,contain these differences at all within itself.

The movement is an explanation which not only explains nothing, but is,?

rather, so clear that as it makes a move to say something different?

from what has already been said, it says instead nothing at all and?

only repeats the same thing.