source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lcmZkrtsmyU

a man arrested last week with weapons in the neighborhood of former President Barack Obama here in Washington, D.C. Federal prosecutors say the suspect began live-streaming in that area shortly after he re-shared a social media post from the former President Donald Trump, in which Trump posted what he claimed was Obama's address. CNN's Caitlin Polans joins me now. Caitlin, so did the former president share something close to the Obama's address? He purportedly shared an address that put this man inside the perimeter where the Secret Service was protecting in a neighborhood in Washington, D.C. where the Obamas currently live. So within a few blocks, in other words? It appears to be in the neighborhood itself, according to the court documents. But what's so concerning about this is that that wasn't when this guy got on the radar of investigators or federal protection, the FBI. They had been monitoring him because he participated in January 6th, allegedly. There are videos of him. He was posting on YouTube about being an insurrectionist and then had a series of live-streams in the month of June where he's talking about January 6th, his participation, as well as saying threatening things, like he wanted to blow up his car outside of a federal building the day before he goes to this neighborhood in Washington, D.C. There was also another incident where he was live-streaming himself talking about January 6th inside of an elementary school in Maryland. And so all of this comes together. And on a live-stream, the feds watch him walk through the neighborhood. He's streaming. He's saying he has them surrounded, presumably the Obamas. And then he takes off on foot. They finally arrest him in a wooded area very nearby. Okay. Hold that thought for a moment because I know you have new reporting as well on the indictment against former President Trump and that there might be a more detailed or less, I should say, redacted version of that indictment coming out. Yeah. So we're waiting to see if there are more details about what we can learn of the investigation that led to this indictment. So back whenever the FBI did that search of Mar-a-Lago last year, they had to submit a pretty detailed affidavit in court saying, this is why we believe we will find evidence inside Mar-a-Lago. After that search, we got a version of that court document that had a lot of redactions in it. So now that Trump has been indicted, CNN, other media outlets went back to court and says, can you give us another version with fewer redactions now that we see the indictment? And so a judge has told the Justice Department, we are going to get to see another version of that paper. Notable. Okay. We'll learn more there. I do want to go back and bring in CNN national security analyst and former assistant secretary at the Department of Homeland Security, Julia Keim, on the question here of a former president sharing what turned out not to be the exact address of the Obamas here in Washington, but at least in the neighborhood, put this suspect in the neighborhood there. And the suspect considered enough of a threat that he was taken in by secret service protecting the former president. Is that a dangerous thing for a former president to do, to share with his followers that information? When I heard this story, I was thinking about, you know, the moments after President Biden became president, he denied Donald Trump access to present national security briefings. And now I think it was prescient. Forget Mar-a-Lago and the classified information he took. Donald Trump, as I have been saying for many years, knows exactly what he is doing. He puts out what's allegedly an address or something close, as Kaitlan is describing, is in the neighborhood. That's close enough for me. And it certainly will be close enough for the Secret Service. He is not doing that for neighborly brotherhood. He is doing that because his followers will do something with it. Most will ignore it. Most Trump supporters do not support violence, but he knows that there's some group of them that will do something. And Trump can claim plausible deniability. He can claim, I was just putting this out there. Why is everyone taking everything so seriously? We've got seven years of evidence of him doing this. And yet he did it again against a former president. And not surprising that the person who took the bait is someone who also followed him on January 6. So let me ask you bigger pictures so folks at home can understand the seriousness of this. There is a deep problem with right-wing extremism in this country. In fact, the FBI, not just under this administration, but the previous one, has identified right-wing extremism as the greatest domestic terror threat, outpacing even international terrorist groups. So you have a former president sharing information that someone in one of those groups might then use. If you were looking at this from your former perch at the Department of Homeland Security, would you consider that person, in this case the former president, as aiding and abetting a threat by doing that? Aiding and abetting would be hard because I think Trump could say, you know, could say, I wasn't directing them towards something. But what you could look to for Trump is a sense of sort of assisting this environment. And the solution may not be a legal prosecution. That's different than, say, January 6, where there might be evidence of sort of a direct involvement with the violence. In this case, what it takes from a sort of counterterrorism perspective, because I view this in that lens, that you have someone who's inciting violence against democratic institutions and against our democracy. You do the things that are being done. These prosecutions are significant, even against the guys who were at January 6, the low-level guys. They're in jail because it makes it harder for there to be recruitment and fundraising. But also the thing that's not happening enough, and I can't say it enough, which is, there has to be a certain amount of shaming of what Trump is doing by his people. And that's what you don't see right now from the Republican Party. You see some of it, and it's important. That will go very far to say, as we've seen in other instances where a party basically abandons a president, that this is not a sustainable, this is not reflective of who we are. And unfortunately, we're not seeing that enough. Right. And what, I mean, establishing here the degree of the former president's help here, as it were, no one seems to debate, to be debating the degree to which the former president is discouraging this kind of anger, and in this case, sharing information that someone with that kind of anger might use. Julia Kayyem, I know we're going to continue this conversation, sadly. It's good to have you on. Thank you.

Section 1: Important Words

1. Arrested - taken into custody by the authorities due to suspicion of committing a crime

2. Weapons - objects used for fighting or defense, such as guns, knives, etc.

3. Neighborhood - a small community or area within a town or city

4. Prosecutors - lawyers who represent the government in criminal cases

5. Live-streaming - broadcasting video and audio content in real-time over the internet

6. Re-shared - shared again or reposted

7. Social media - platforms on the internet that allow users to share content and interact with others

8. Post - a message or piece of content shared on social media

9. Claimed - asserted or stated as a fact

10. Address - the location of a place or residence

11. Perimeter - the boundary or outer edge of an area

12. Protecting - keeping someone or something safe from harm or danger

13. Currently - at the present time

14. Blocks - small areas or sections of a city, usually delineated by streets

15. Allegedly - supposedly or reportedly, without concrete proof

16. Participated - took part or engaged in an activity

17. Insurrectionist - someone who takes part in a violent uprising against an established government or authority

18. Federal building - a building owned or operated by the national government

19. Indictment - a formal accusation of a serious crime, usually issued by a grand jury

20. Redacted - edited or censored to remove sensitive or confidential information

Section 2: Important Grammars

1. Past Perfect Tense: "The suspect had been monitoring him because he participated in January 6th."

? ?Interpretation: Past perfect tense is used to describe an action that happened before another action in the past.

? ?Example Sentence: John had already eaten dinner when the guests arrived.

2. Passive Voice: "He was taken in by the Secret Service protecting the former president."

? ?Interpretation: Passive voice is used when the subject of the sentence receives the action rather than performing it.

? ?Example Sentence: The book was written by William Shakespeare.

3. Conditional Sentence Type 2: "If you were looking at this from your former perch at the Department of Homeland Security, would you consider that person as aiding and abetting a threat by doing that?"

? ?Interpretation: Conditional sentence type 2 is used to express hypothetical or unlikely situations.

? ?Example Sentence: If I had more money, I would travel the world.

Section 3: Questions

1. What are the reasons for the man's arrest?

2. How did the suspect come to the attention of federal investigators?

3. What is the significance of the redacted version of the court document?

Section 4: Example Answers

1. The man was arrested due to being found with weapons near the neighborhood of former President Obama.

2. The suspect was already being monitored by federal investigators because of his alleged participation in the January 6th incident.

3. The redacted version of the court document is important because it may contain more details about the investigation and evidence related to the indictment of former President Trump.

Section 5: Chinese Translation

一名男子在華盛頓特區(qū)前總統(tǒng)巴拉克·奧巴馬的附近被捕。聯(lián)邦檢察官稱，嫌犯在轉(zhuǎn)發(fā)了前總統(tǒng)唐納德·特朗普的社交媒體帖子后不久，開始在該地區(qū)進(jìn)行直播。特朗普在帖子中發(fā)布了他聲稱是奧巴馬的地址。據(jù)CNN的凱特琳·波蘭斯報道，前總統(tǒng)確實分享了一段看似接近奧巴馬地址的信息，這讓這名男子進(jìn)入了特勤局保護(hù)的華盛頓特區(qū)附近的社區(qū)。根據(jù)法庭文件，這似乎是在鄰近社區(qū)內(nèi)。但令人擔(dān)憂的是，這并不是這名男子吸引調(diào)查人員和聯(lián)邦保護(hù)部門（FBI）注意的時候。他們一直在監(jiān)視他，因為他據(jù)稱參與了1月6日的事件。有他的視頻，他在YouTube上發(fā)布關(guān)于他的起義活動的內(nèi)容，并在6月份進(jìn)行了一系列的直播，談?wù)?月6日的事情，并發(fā)表威脅性言論，比如他想在他去華盛頓特區(qū)這個社區(qū)的前一天炸毀一座聯(lián)邦建筑的汽車。還有另一個事件，他在馬里蘭州的一所小學(xué)里直播自己談?wù)?月6日的事情。所有這些都緊密相連。在一次直播中，聯(lián)邦調(diào)查人員看著他走過這個社區(qū)。他直播并聲稱他包圍了奧巴馬，然后他步行離開。他們最終在附近的一片樹林中逮捕了他