學(xué)校給了份作業(yè)，正中下懷：自由選題演講，只要是最近一年新聞里有的都可以。

哎呀，作者君一尋思，那這個(gè)題目豈不是剛好？

于是就寫了寫，雖然字?jǐn)?shù)沒控制好超了，但這個(gè)第五版演講稿也算可以見人了。

其實(shí)很想給你們看看作者君做的PPT，但是沒辦法，那個(gè)只能往讀者群里分享了。

以下，其中中文版為谷歌翻譯貢獻(xiàn)。

[opens a 1.5L water bottle and take a sip] Do anyone know what this is?

Well, this is a bottle of radioactive water from Fukushima Daiichi nuclear pla —No, no, seriously, this is just a bottle of fresh water, from Woolworths. (Suddenly serious) 10 years later though, we might actually find bottled water radioactive, alongside everything else which also becomes radioactive. Those radioactive substances are from an accident long, long ago.

12 years ago, a tsunami near Fukushima cut the electricity used to pump cold water to cool the nuclear reactors in Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant. This caused the fuel to overheat, melting through the container, and was exposed to the environment after explosions.[Images]

This exposure not only required water to cool the core down, but it also contaminates the ground water and rainwater which directly contacts the core. All that water contacted with core became radioactive. [video]As a response, Japanese government chose to filter the radioactive contents, then stored them in storage tanks. Six weeks ago, the Japanese authorities initiated the release of “treated water” , or 処理水(Shori si) in Japanese—(Looking at Luna（注：一名日裔同學(xué)）, in an overexaggerated “serious” tone) I warn you do not tell everyone if I spelled it wrong, or I will murder you!

According to Japanese government, the “treated water” is “safe under drink water standards” and is therefore “safe” to release into the ocean. However, the plan also attracted much controversy around the globe.

Now, if this bottle of water is actually filled with that “treated” water, would you take a drink? (Pause) I would not, which is why I think the radioactive water should not have been released into the ocean and should be stopped as soon as possible.

BP1- “treated water”?

To begin, I would like to inform everyone about the effects of radioactive waste. [image] It ejects neutrons out of it rapidly, all with the potential to break countless strands of DNA in countless cells, as neutrons will not stop after piercing one cell. Impacted cells may either unable to reproduce; or they become defective and so will the cells it reproduces; or they develop into cancers. To above reasons, radioactive waste severely threatens all organisms near it.

Now, let us have a look at water stored in Fukushima. That is water which directly contacted the exposed core, treated under ALPS, which stands for Advanced Liquid Processing System, but still contains some radioactive substances. Interestingly, radioactive waste is “a type of hazardous waste that contains radioactive material”, which matches radioactive water in Fukushima. Em…

Why do I have to clarify that? Because the name of a concept affects how we understand it. How would you feel about “treated water”? In my opinion it is close to industrial wastewater. Will “radioactive water” sound the same? No, they are radioactive wastes. Obviously, people will not regulate industrial wastewater as seriously as radioactive wastes, which is why now hundreds of tonnes of those wastes are flowing into the Pacific each day!

?

BP2-Wolf in sheep’s clothing

Although the Japanese government depicts that their “treated” water is safe, which the examination to “treated water samples” by “International Atomic Energy Agency”, or IAEA supports, the authority of those statements are weak, even if IAEA is the United Nation equivalent in nuclear field. Let us unwrap those statements “supported” by “science”. ALPS is a filter system developed by Japan used only in Fukushima, its effect is not yet verified globally; IAEA did examine water samples, but the samples are directly given by Japanese government. They can even offer IAEA the bottle of water in my hand right now(body language), and tell them, “Hey, this is the water sample from Fukushima” if Tokyo feels like it. Because of that, even the statement IAEA made also mentioned that it will not take any responsibilities. Now, based on those scientific nonsense, Japanese authorities say, “Our release is supported by science”, which, well… is biased.

BP3-Not “Them” but “Us”

What will happen to humanity when radioactive substances spread throughout the Pacific? One academic publication claimed the total global social welfare cost could exceed US$200 billion, but to be honest, we don’t know. As Japan acknowledges radioactive water as “treated water”, almost no research is conducted; we better not to take risks.

Although the radioactive water Japan releases will probably not going to directly kill, Japan acts very irresponsibly. Japan placed the whole world into a bet, betting that side effects for releasing nuclear wastes into the ocean will be negligible. Yet, If Japan lost the bet, everyone would face the consequences equally.

Possibly, in ten years, we will be able to enjoy a radioactive shower at home in Melbourne. By that point, not as much can be done.

Reflection

The famous physicist Albert Einstein once said, “The world will not be destroyed by those who do evil, but by those who watch them without doing anything.” In fact, if the “treated water” is literally under “drink water standards”, there are no good rationales to release the water into the ocean; if it is not drinkable, then it is not as safe as Japan illustrates and should not be released either. Since Japan is a country lack of fresh water, I even have a solution to that “treated water” right here: desalinate the treated water, pack that water into this bottle (prop) and sell it as drink water.

The question comes back though——

Would you take a drink?

【谷歌生草器】

[打開1.5L水瓶喝一口]有人知道這是什么嗎？

嗯，這是一瓶來自福島第一核電站的放射性——不，不，說真的，這只是一瓶來自 Woolworths 的淡水。 （突然嚴(yán)肅起來）十年后，我們實(shí)際上可能會(huì)發(fā)現(xiàn)瓶裝水具有放射性，其他所有東西也具有放射性。 這些放射性物質(zhì)是很久很久以前的一次事故造成的。

12 年前，福島附近的海嘯切斷了福島第一核電站用于泵送冷水以冷卻核反應(yīng)堆的電力。 這導(dǎo)致燃料過熱，通過容器熔化，并在爆炸后暴露在環(huán)境中。[圖片]

這種暴露不僅需要水來冷卻核心，而且還污染了直接接觸核心的地下水和雨水。 所有與核心接觸的水都具有放射性。 [視頻]作為回應(yīng)，日本政府選擇過濾放射性物質(zhì)，然后將其儲(chǔ)存在儲(chǔ)罐中。 六周前，日本當(dāng)局開始釋放“處理過的水”，或者日語中的“處理水（Shori si）”——（看著Luna（注：一名日裔同學(xué)），語氣過于夸張“嚴(yán)肅”）我警告 如果我拼錯(cuò)了，你不要告訴所有人，否則我會(huì)殺了你！

日本政府表示，“經(jīng)過處理的水”“符合飲用水標(biāo)準(zhǔn)”，因此可以“安全”排入海洋。 然而，該計(jì)劃在全球范圍內(nèi)也引起了很大爭議。

現(xiàn)在，如果這瓶水實(shí)際上裝的是經(jīng)過“處理”的水，你會(huì)喝嗎？ （停頓）我不會(huì)，這就是為什么我認(rèn)為放射性水不應(yīng)該被釋放到海洋中，應(yīng)該盡快停止。

BP1-“處理過的水”？

首先，我想向大家介紹一下放射性廢物的影響。 [圖片]它快速地從其中噴射出中子，所有這些都有可能斷裂無數(shù)細(xì)胞中的無數(shù)DNA鏈，因?yàn)橹凶釉诖檀┮粋€(gè)細(xì)胞后不會(huì)停止。 受影響的細(xì)胞可能無法繁殖； 或者它們變得有缺陷，它復(fù)制的細(xì)胞也會(huì)有缺陷； 或者它們發(fā)展成癌癥。 由于上述原因，放射性廢物嚴(yán)重威脅著其附近的所有生物。

現(xiàn)在，讓我們看看福島儲(chǔ)存的水。 那是直接接觸裸露巖心的水，經(jīng)過ALPS（先進(jìn)液體處理系統(tǒng)）處理，但仍然含有一些放射性物質(zhì)。 有趣的是，放射性廢物是“一種含有放射性物質(zhì)的危險(xiǎn)廢物”，與福島的放射性水相匹配。 嗯……

為什么我必須澄清這一點(diǎn)？ 因?yàn)橐粋€(gè)概念的名稱會(huì)影響我們對(duì)它的理解。 您對(duì)“處理過的水”有何看法？ 在我看來，它接近于工業(yè)廢水。 “放射性水”聽起來一樣嗎？ 不，它們是放射性廢物。 顯然，人們不會(huì)像監(jiān)管放射性廢物那樣嚴(yán)格監(jiān)管工業(yè)廢水，這就是為什么現(xiàn)在每天都有數(shù)百噸此類廢物流入太平洋！

BP2-披著羊皮的狼

盡管日本政府聲稱其“處理過的”水是安全的，并且“國際原子能機(jī)構(gòu)”或IAEA對(duì)“處理過的水樣”的檢查也支持這一點(diǎn)，但這些聲明的權(quán)威性很弱，即使IAEA是聯(lián)合國 相當(dāng)于核領(lǐng)域。 讓我們來揭開那些有“科學(xué)”“支持”的說法。 ALPS是日本開發(fā)的過濾系統(tǒng)，僅在福島使用，其效果尚未在全球得到驗(yàn)證； 國際原子能機(jī)構(gòu)確實(shí)檢查了水樣，但這些樣品是日本政府直接提供的。 他們甚至可以立即向國際原子能機(jī)構(gòu)提供我手中的一瓶水（肢體語言），并告訴他們，“嘿，這是來自福島的水樣”，如果東京愿意的話。 因此，就連IAEA的聲明中也提到不會(huì)承擔(dān)任何責(zé)任。 現(xiàn)在，日本當(dāng)局根據(jù)這些科學(xué)廢話說，“我們的釋放是有科學(xué)依據(jù)的”，這……是有偏見的。

BP3-不是“他們”而是“我們”

當(dāng)放射性物質(zhì)擴(kuò)散到整個(gè)太平洋時(shí)，人類將會(huì)發(fā)生什么？ 一份學(xué)術(shù)出版物聲稱全球社會(huì)福利總成本可能超過2000億美元，但說實(shí)話，我們不知道。 由于日本承認(rèn)放射性水為“處理過的水”，因此幾乎沒有進(jìn)行任何研究； 我們最好不要冒險(xiǎn)。?

雖然日本釋放的放射性水可能不會(huì)直接造成死亡，但日本的做法非常不負(fù)責(zé)任。 日本把全世界都下了賭注，賭核廢料排入海洋的副作用可以忽略不計(jì)。 然而，如果日本輸了，那么每個(gè)人都會(huì)平等地面臨后果。

也許十年后，我們就能在墨爾本的家中享受放射性陣雨。 到那時(shí)，能做的事情已經(jīng)不多了。

反射

著名物理學(xué)家阿爾伯特·愛因斯坦曾說過：“世界不會(huì)被那些作惡的人毀滅，而是被那些袖手旁觀的人毀滅?！?事實(shí)上，如果“處理過的水”確實(shí)符合“飲用水標(biāo)準(zhǔn)”，那么就沒有充分的理由將水排入海洋； 如果它不能飲用，那么它就不像日本所宣傳的那么安全，也不應(yīng)該被釋放。 由于日本是一個(gè)缺乏淡水的國家，我甚至在這里對(duì)“處理過的水”有一個(gè)解決方案：將處理過的水淡化，將其裝入這個(gè)瓶子（道具）中，然后將其作為飲用水出售。

然而問題又回來了——

你會(huì)喝嗎？

要不是沒文更新了鬼會(huì)放這個(gè)啊！甚至還沒完善好?。。?！沒辦法，今天光是對(duì)著演講稿做PPT就花掉了七個(gè)小時(shí)，最近根本就沒時(shí)間寫……TAT