? ? ? ? 最近發(fā)生的日本核廢水引發(fā)全球公眾的核安全擔(dān)憂，充分暴露了人類對核理論認(rèn)識的膚淺，本來用來解決能源問題的技術(shù)，變成了污染環(huán)境的禍害。被人類寄語厚望的太陽能光伏產(chǎn)業(yè)，也遇到瓶頸，大量設(shè)備老化面臨拆除的困難，太陽能是宇宙賜予人類的財富，由于人類不懂光的本質(zhì)，不僅浪費(fèi)了太陽能，還造成后續(xù)的資源浪費(fèi)。

? ? ? ?由于人類在基礎(chǔ)物理上的研究滯后，現(xiàn)在所謂的新技術(shù)、新革命，大部分幾乎就是媒體炒作的噱頭。當(dāng)今的學(xué)術(shù)界存在的問題，讓人聯(lián)想到留在中國人心中永遠(yuǎn)的刺，圓明園被八國聯(lián)軍掠奪和燒毀，帶給國人心中永遠(yuǎn)的恥辱。清朝的統(tǒng)治者，可以說是勵精圖治，可惜到了最后只能以賣地求生，讓大量的國土流失他國。最根本的問題是，國家的發(fā)展方向錯誤，僵化的思維方式，無法適應(yīng)時代的變遷。當(dāng)今的學(xué)術(shù)界何嘗不是如此，研究方向把握在少數(shù)大咖手中，由他們決定科技、技術(shù)的方向。國人現(xiàn)在還能站在圓明園的廢墟上，進(jìn)行各種的反思。但當(dāng)人類處于被毀滅的邊緣時，連這樣的機(jī)會都沒有！

? ? ? ??本來設(shè)想的，將這些年的研究與世人共享，可惜連機(jī)會都沒有。系列的專業(yè)文章包括，宇宙模型系列、光的本質(zhì)系列、物質(zhì)與能量系列、生命本質(zhì)系列等等，以此為契機(jī)解決人類目前面臨的各種困境。幾千年來人類形成的相對論觀念，根深蒂固，學(xué)術(shù)界的大佬們，聲稱所謂的創(chuàng)新，不過是標(biāo)榜自己的名號，徒有虛名罷了。也曾打算將成都老官山出土的《天回醫(yī)簡》為基礎(chǔ)，系統(tǒng)地說明中醫(yī)、西醫(yī)的本質(zhì)、區(qū)別等系列文章，想想退休后在大學(xué)的經(jīng)歷還是決定放棄。一是沒有地方愿意發(fā)表，二是人們根本不愿意相信。何必庸人自擾那?想想當(dāng)年為了日心說，羅馬教會燒死了布魯諾，現(xiàn)在與以前有什么區(qū)別那？只是更加文明而已！當(dāng)前學(xué)術(shù)界的各種高大上的理論，在地球面臨的各種困境中，又有多少可以解決實(shí)際問題的？像美麗的氣泡，絢爛奪目，我這些“民科”的知識，自然是上不了臺面的。時間會證明一切的。

?

?

Japan's nuclear wastewater discharge looks at the human energy crisis

Zhang Xiaoyao

The recent occurrence of nuclear wastewater in Japan has caused nuclear security concerns of the global public, fully exposing the superficial understanding of human understanding of nuclear theory. The technology that was originally used to solve energy problems has become a scourge of pollution. The solar photovoltaic industry, which is highly hoped by humans, also encounters bottlenecks. A large amount of equipment is facing the difficulty of demolition. Solar energy is the wealth given to human beings by the universe. Because humans do not understand the nature of light, they not only waste solar energy, but also cause subsequent waste of resources.

Due to the lag of human research in basic physics, most of the so -called new technologies and new revolutions are almost almost the gimmicks of media hype. The problems in today's academic circles are reminiscent of the eternal thorn in the hearts of the Chinese. The Yuanmingyuan is plundered and burned by the Eight -Power Allied Forces, bringing eternal shame to the hearts of the people. The rulers of the Qing Dynasty can be said to be governed by detail, but unfortunately, in the end, they can only survive with land selling, so that a large number of land can be lost in other countries. The most fundamental problem is that the country's development direction is wrong and the rigid way of thinking cannot adapt to the changes of the times. Is this not the case in today's academic circles. The research direction is grasped in the hands of a few big coffees, and they decide the direction of technology and technology. Chinese people can still stand on the ruins of Yuanmingyuan for various reflections. But when humans are on the verge of being destroyed, there is no such opportunity!

I originally imagined that the research of these years was shared with the world, but unfortunately there was no chance. The series of professional articles include the cosmic model series, the essential series of light, the material and energy series, the essential series of life, etc., as an opportunity to solve the various dilemma currently facing humanity. For thousands of years, the concept of relativity formed by human beings, deep -rooted, and academic big guys, claiming the so -called innovation, are just the names of their names, and they have false names. Based on the "Tianhui Medicine" unearthed from the old officials of Chengdu, the nature of Chinese medicine and western medicine systematically explained the essence of traditional Chinese medicine and western medicine. Thinking about the experience of retiring after retirement, I decided to give up. One is that there is no place to publish, and the other is that people are unwilling to believe it. Why bother to disturb? Think about the Roman church burning Bruno for the sake of the day. What is the difference between now? It's just more civilized! How many of the various lofty theories in the current academic community can solve practical problems in the various difficulties facing the earth? Like beautiful bubbles, brilliant and dazzling, my knowledge of "folk science" naturally cannot be on the table. Time will tell.