Languishing VS Flourishing
Languishing VS Flourishing
Languishing VS Flourishing
●?? ?Flourishing
●? 情緒積極、不斷成長(zhǎng)、對(duì)未來(lái)充滿希望。
●?? Languishing
沒(méi)什么大病，但也好不到哪兒去(not ill, but not well)
●? 倦怠，毫無(wú)生氣，對(duì)什么事都缺乏興趣。
●?? Languishing VS Flourishing
●? languishing定義為“心理健康缺席”(the absence of mental health)。
處在languishing狀態(tài)的人(以下簡(jiǎn)稱(chēng)languisher)，對(duì)情緒的感知低，日?；顒?dòng)減少，工作狀態(tài)也不佳。
●? 相對(duì)的，flourishing指的是“心理健康在場(chǎng)”(the presence of mental health)。
處在flourishing狀態(tài)的人(以下簡(jiǎn)稱(chēng)flourisher)，能更好地處理人際關(guān)系和日常生活中的問(wèn)題。
●? ?
●? 意義 meaning
●?? Languisher更注重需求的滿足(need fulfillment)。
●?? Flourisher更注重價(jià)值實(shí)現(xiàn)(value realization)。
●? 目標(biāo) goals
●?? Languisher在追求目標(biāo)時(shí)更關(guān)注自我與內(nèi)心(intrapersonal)，同時(shí)會(huì)為了避免一些負(fù)面的東西而做出調(diào)整。
●?? Flourisher的動(dòng)機(jī)更多與人際關(guān)系有關(guān)(interpersonal)，或是為了獲得更廣泛的發(fā)展空間(wider context development)。
●? 關(guān)系 relationship
●?? Languisher更多地從自我出發(fā)，強(qiáng)調(diào)“我”從中獲得了什么。
●?? 而flourisher更強(qiáng)調(diào)互惠，互相滿足，并更愿意在關(guān)系中付出。
●?? 轉(zhuǎn)變
最難的不是怎么做，而是如何開(kāi)始。 需要先擺脫languishing的狀態(tài)，才有可能成為flourisher。
●? 第一步：從0到0.1，積累可以帶來(lái)愉悅感的小成就
●? 第二步：改變自己的人生哲學(xué)
建立起flourisher秉持的那種人生觀——實(shí)現(xiàn)型的幸福主義 全身心地投入充滿挑戰(zhàn)的目標(biāo)，達(dá)到個(gè)人成長(zhǎng)并體會(huì)到意義感，得到幸福。
●?? 參考資料來(lái)源：
●? 公眾號(hào) KnowYourself
●? Faulk, K.E., Gloria, C.T., Steinhardt, M.A. (2013). Coping Profiles Characterize Individual Flourishing, Languishing, and Depression. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping: An International Journal, 26(4), 378-390.
●?? 摘要 Abstract
●? According to the broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions, negative emotions narrow one's thought–action repertoire. In contrast, positive emotions have a broadening effect, expanding cognitive capacity, increasing potential coping strategies that come to mind, and enhancing decision-making, reaction, and adaptation to adversity. Fredrickson and Losada determined that a positivity ratio – the ratio of experienced positive to negative emotions – at or above 2.9 promotes human flourishing. A ratio below 2.9 is indicative of languishing individuals, whereas a ratio below 1.0 is a marker of depression Results were consistent with the theoretical predictions, as coping profiles of the groups differed significantly, with flourishing individuals favoring adaptive coping strategies more than those who were languishing or depressed.
