寶們都到齊了嗎？

每天進(jìn)步一點(diǎn)點(diǎn) 你可以的！

備考英語復(fù)習(xí)的小伙伴們 堅(jiān)持?。?/p>

跟著何凱文每日一句?

做題會(huì)越來越上手噠!??

話不多說！快來看今天的內(nèi)容！

今天的句子:

For doctors treating patients with COVID-19, the pressures of managing a pandemic illness are aggravated by the fact that their North Stars for treatment decisions—peer-reviewed reports in medical journals—are also facing steep challenges in finding ways to publish reliable information with far less time than they are accustomed to having.?

思考題:

??The doctors are under greater pressure because_______.

A. medical journals have no stable data source

B. peer-review process has been overstated

C. peer-reviewed reports are under challenges

D. treatment decisions are facing? challenges

句子解析:

treating patients：治療病人

managing a pandemic illness：治療流行病

aggravated 加劇

North Star 北極星

peer-reviewer 同行評(píng)估

medical journals 醫(yī)學(xué)雜志

steep challenges 嚴(yán)峻挑戰(zhàn)

?be accustomed to 習(xí)慣

思考題解析:

首先句子主干：

the pressures? are aggravated

?(醫(yī)生的壓力加劇了）

原因就是by后面的內(nèi)容，

這就是結(jié)構(gòu)決定的，傳說中的：讀不懂也需要知道后面是原因。

原因是一個(gè)事實(shí)（fact）什么事實(shí)？后面加上了一個(gè)從句：

這里的：their North Star =peer-reviewed reports in medical journals

所以原因就是：

their North Stars are also facing steep challenges

=peer-reviewed reports are under challenges

所以答案就是：

C.peer-reviewed reports are under challenges

同行評(píng)估的報(bào)告受到了挑戰(zhàn)

正確答案就是這樣出來的！

再看其他的三個(gè)選項(xiàng)：

A.medical journals have no stable data source

醫(yī)學(xué)期刊沒有穩(wěn)定的數(shù)據(jù)來源。

沒有提及，錯(cuò)！

B.peer-review process has been overstated

同行評(píng)估的過程被高估了。

沒有提及，錯(cuò)！

C.peer-reviewed reports are under challenges

同行評(píng)估的報(bào)告受到了挑戰(zhàn)

D.treatment decisions are facing? challenges

治療的決定受到了挑戰(zhàn)

這里就是傳說中的：“拼湊”也就是“拼多多”，

看好哦：

their North Star for treatment decisions are also facing steep challenges.

不等于:

treatment decisions are also facing steep challenges.

文章背景和來源：

Rushing Science in the Pandemic

疫情之下的科學(xué)快跑

Source:

https://time.com/5851849/coronavirus-science-advice/

背景：科研通常是一個(gè)沉悶又冗長(zhǎng)的過程：科學(xué)家檢查數(shù)據(jù)，復(fù)核數(shù)據(jù)，審讀結(jié)論，復(fù)審結(jié)論，然后再把自己艱苦的工作成果發(fā)給科學(xué)期刊，期刊編輯在出版成果之前會(huì)再對(duì)論文進(jìn)行同行評(píng)審等進(jìn)一步的審核。但當(dāng)下的新冠疫情卻并不會(huì)恪守如此謹(jǐn)慎的時(shí)間軸，面對(duì)新的傳染性疾病，公共衛(wèi)生專家、政府官員、醫(yī)生和病人們都急于從科學(xué)出版物中找到答案。在這種快速出版的壓力下，往常的科研和出版全流程無法被嚴(yán)格地執(zhí)行，各大頂級(jí)醫(yī)學(xué)期刊最近都出現(xiàn)了可靠性極為可疑的文章和史無前例的快速撤稿。對(duì)于廣大一線醫(yī)務(wù)工作者來說，這些錯(cuò)誤的科研導(dǎo)向平添了他們本就不小的壓力。一方面，疫情要求我們?cè)诳萍汲霭骖I(lǐng)域縮短周期，另一方面，不可靠的成果有百害無一利。面對(duì)這個(gè)僵局，整個(gè)科研和科技出版應(yīng)對(duì)流程進(jìn)行改革，加大數(shù)據(jù)公開和關(guān)鍵信息的透明度，聚眾人之力，讓重要可靠的成果能快速地被閱讀和核實(shí)。

不忘初心 砥礪前行

研路漫漫 唯吾作伴

天貓?? “新文道教育旗艦店“雙11預(yù)售惠不可擋

?? 22/23考研課程勁爆抄底價(jià)?? 每?? 200-30

?? 更有大咖講師攜手購課好禮，助力你的成研之旅！