正文翻譯

Why is shipbuilding so concentrated in South Korea??

為什么造船業(yè)如此集中在韓國？

評論翻譯

And, what many people don’t realize is that Hyundai is really big on shipbuilding (yes, its revenue is comparable to Hyundai Motors). Some people might think that Korea just started shipbuilding out of nowhere but no, they were very serious in shipbuilding since 1970s. But since shipbuilding is very labor-intensive and low on ROI, I feel like they will eventually be surpassed by China in near future.

而且，許多人沒有意識到的是，現(xiàn)代汽車在造船方面真的很強大(是的，它的收入可以與現(xiàn)代汽車相媲美)。有些人可能會認為韓國是無緣無故地發(fā)展造船業(yè)的，但事實并非如此，他們自上世紀70年代以來就非常重視造船業(yè)。但是，由于造船業(yè)是勞動密集型的，投資回報率很低，我覺得在不久的將來，它們最終會被中國超越。

Paresh Terse
One report I came across on NY TV, don't recollect on details.

我在紐約電視上看到一個報道，不記得細節(jié)了。

1) It mentioned S Koreans using Automation / robots to build economies of scale…. so India, China cannot compete.
2) These Robots and automation do the job much faster and do much better cutting and weld than Humans.

1)它提到韓國人使用自動化/機器人來建立規(guī)模經(jīng)濟... ... 所以印度和中國無法競爭。
2)這些機器人和自動化系統(tǒng)能夠比人類更快地完成工作，并且能夠更好地進行切割和焊接。

This will ensure Quality and economies of scale compared to other countries. Even Chile , India or Brazil.In another context , Ship Building also requires Dry docks and heavy capital infrastructure , its capital cost which the koreans has already paid off.Americans / french are good at warships , English, Dutch are best builders, that's why you see most of the Luxury Cruise Liners come from.In another documentary, ( Not China bashing intentionally guys) , But the documentary showed many orders from china being delayed or bad quality in design , welds, materials. So much so the folks who paid the deposit of these ships abandoned their orders.Can you beat Koreans at ship building, sure. Can you match their quality and cost… I don't think so , not yet at least. It could be India or china though.

與其他國家相比，這將確保質(zhì)量和規(guī)模經(jīng)濟，甚至是智利、印度和巴西。另一方面，造船業(yè)也需要船塢和重型基礎設施，韓國人已經(jīng)花了這些資本成本。美國/法國擅長戰(zhàn)艦，英國和荷蘭是最好的建造者，這就是為什么你看到大多數(shù)豪華郵輪來自這些地方。在另一部紀錄片中，(不是故意抨擊中國的家伙)，但是這部紀錄片展示了許多來自中國的訂單被延遲或者在設計、焊接、材料方面質(zhì)量不好。以至于付了船舶押金的人們放棄了他們的訂單。你能在造船上打敗韓國人嗎? 當然。你能匹配他們的質(zhì)量和成本... 我不這樣認為，至少現(xiàn)在還不行。未來可能是印度或中國。

Alessandro Catorcini?
Korea owns the low-tech ship building thanks to the economy of scale. Building a bulk carrier or vanilla container ship anywhere else would cost much more. They build hundreds of instances of the same design - that makes the cost of each ship unbeatable. Where the technology required is about consistency, Busan is where you want to go: quality and workmanship are great.High-tech constructions (passenger ships, aluminum-keeled fast ferries, LNG carriers, etc.) is the part of the market they have not quite cornered yet and where the competition is the hottest.

由于規(guī)模經(jīng)濟，韓國擁有技術(shù)含量低的造船廠。在其他地方建造散裝貨船或集裝箱船的成本要高得多。他們建造了數(shù)百個相同設計的產(chǎn)品，這使得每艘船的成本都便宜到無與倫比。技術(shù)要求的是一致性，釜山是你想去的地方: 質(zhì)量和做工是偉大的。高科技建造(客輪、鋁龍骨快速渡輪、液化天然氣運輸船等)是他們尚未完全壟斷的市場，競爭最為激烈。

Jack Ye
That is false. Shipbuilding industry is quite competitive among China, Korea and Japan.

這是錯誤的。造船業(yè)在中國、韓國和日本之間是相當有競爭力的。