616官方尚未對(duì)此事件進(jìn)行回復(fù)，但Guy已經(jīng)明確地給出回應(yīng)。根據(jù)他的回應(yīng)，我認(rèn)為解封誤封的賬號(hào)可以說(shuō)是不可能了。以下為Guy原文。 Some further information regarding recently carried out bans in Arcaea. 1. We confirmed evidence of cheating tools being used in every ban that was carried out. No bans were carried out using heuristics or ‘obtaining scores too quickly’ alone whatsoever. 2. We cannot reveal the evidence of cheating tools used as this would likely cause further cheating. 3. Multiple staff (more than 4) in charge of key areas of Arcaea agreed upon the actions taken in this ban wave. 4. There was a large spike in both increased skill of players, back to back FPM achievements within minutes, and cheating tool evidence which occurred on the 26th and 27th July. 5. Many accounts that have had a large play history and notable achievements were found to have evidence of cheat tool use. We took action regardless of severity of the tool use – as these tools allow for custom scores outside of FPM achievement. 6. Many (30+) users who have contacted lowiro support have had their accounts manual reviewed and the bans upheld. We have not yet found a single case of a mistaken ban after manual review. Targeted harassment does not achieve change but simply makes the lives of those involved miserable and reduces the ability for projects to continue. Think twice whether you are standing up for a just cause or merely amplifying the voices of cheaters. If you choose to doubt lowiro’s ability to determine cheaters, you should equally doubt the honesty of those making claims about this. 關(guān)于最近在Arcaea實(shí)施禁令的一些進(jìn)一步信息。 1.我們確認(rèn)了在執(zhí)行的每一項(xiàng)禁令中都使用作弊工具的證據(jù)。沒(méi)有使用啟發(fā)式或“獲取分?jǐn)?shù)太快”單獨(dú)實(shí)施禁令。 2.我們不能透露使用作弊工具的證據(jù)，因?yàn)檫@可能會(huì)導(dǎo)致進(jìn)一步的作弊。 3.負(fù)責(zé)Arceaa關(guān)鍵區(qū)域的多名工作人員（超過(guò)4人）同意在這場(chǎng)禁令風(fēng)波中采取的行動(dòng)。 4.7月26日和27日，玩家技能的提高、幾分鐘內(nèi)的背靠背FPM成績(jī)以及作弊工具證據(jù)都出現(xiàn)了大幅飆升。 5.許多有著大量游戲歷史和顯著成就的賬戶(hù)都被發(fā)現(xiàn)有使用作弊工具的證據(jù)。無(wú)論工具使用的嚴(yán)重程度如何，我們都采取了行動(dòng)——因?yàn)檫@些工具允許FPM成績(jī)之外的自定義分?jǐn)?shù)。 6.許多（30多名）聯(lián)系lowiro支持的用戶(hù)已經(jīng)對(duì)他們的賬戶(hù)進(jìn)行了手動(dòng)審查，但維持了禁令。經(jīng)過(guò)人工審查，我們還沒(méi)有發(fā)現(xiàn)一例錯(cuò)誤的禁令。 你們懷有目的的騷擾并不能帶來(lái)改變，只會(huì)使相關(guān)人員的生活受到負(fù)面影響，并影響此項(xiàng)目的進(jìn)行。無(wú)論你是為了正義而站出來(lái)，還是僅僅為了放大騙子的聲音，都要三思而后行。如果你選擇懷疑lowiro確定作弊者的能力，你同樣應(yīng)該懷疑那些對(duì)此提出指控的人是否可信。 對(duì)此，我認(rèn)為有一些問(wèn)題他在回避/隱瞞。 1.616是否具備檢測(cè)玩家成績(jī)進(jìn)步是否正常的機(jī)制？正常的推分貌似無(wú)法與異常的理論值成績(jī)相分離。由此616是否采取任何可以避免誤封的措施？ 2.616對(duì)30余名申訴的玩家進(jìn)行人工審查，在審查結(jié)果中為何選擇以“異?；顒?dòng)”作為封禁理由，并且僅回復(fù)封禁無(wú)法撤銷(xiāo)？Guy在此處特意強(qiáng)調(diào)了“人工審查”，在封禁時(shí)是否基于人工審查？還是說(shuō)，封禁時(shí)僅僅依靠所謂“不可公布的作弊證據(jù)”，交由機(jī)器審查？616是否對(duì)于此次封禁的可靠性進(jìn)行考證？ 3.當(dāng)提出對(duì)616指控的人提供了相關(guān)證據(jù)（比如我，在對(duì)lowiro的申訴中發(fā)送了我這一端的數(shù)據(jù)，包括推分記錄、各次成績(jī)截圖、賬戶(hù)購(gòu)買(mǎi)記錄、游戲后臺(tái)數(shù)據(jù)），為何616仍舊以相同言論對(duì)待？616僅提出了“是否可信”的問(wèn)題，為何沒(méi)有延伸，將“如果可信”算作考慮范圍？ 由此我認(rèn)為Guy根本沒(méi)有考慮解封257個(gè)賬號(hào)里哪怕一個(gè)。他以偏主觀的判斷來(lái)論證自己封禁的合理性，但沒(méi)有也從未基于玩家角度考慮。一個(gè)游戲賬號(hào)對(duì)于他來(lái)說(shuō)什么也不是。 所以，這就沒(méi)了。All is done。