interviewer 00:00

Account for the arility of the entire soviet experience in the last 50 years, 60 years.

Borges 00:06

What do you think that eating has explained away? I think it's quite common. For example, let's say what maybe I'm hoping to do by saying this, you take the United States. You have at least half a dozen men of genius. I mean, you mean 200 years? Well, you have an example. You have Paul, you have Melvin, you have Whitman. You have also, you have Henry James. Well, you compressed what well and what power, what? I don't want to rope him in, but if you do, it's not my funeral at once. But at the same time, if you think of Canada and Australia, they have produced nothing, produce practically nothing. So maybe the American revolution made for good from a little point of view.

interviewer 00:59

You consider 6 people in 200 years of profusion, of genius and aridity, the rule of thumb.

Borges 01:06

Yes, I should say so. But what I mean to say is that, well, you may always like Poe. I don't think much of him as a poet, but I think of him as being a man of genius. And we, what is like Whitman, you can find quite bad lines in him, but it can't be thought away. You can't think of contemporary literature and dismess with them. Yes, and smith. And they can't be thought away. While other writers may be thought away, for example, worthwhile into the whole world. I mean, I suppose we have some fine writer, the fine writers, let's say, for valentines or for chileans or for peruvians and so on, but they mean nothing whatever to the world.

interviewer 01:50

Well, you do. And the.

Borges 01:53

Ruler did. Well, in my case, I think that what you're saying is a form of pessimist. Men say that what a property mission.

interviewer 02:02

I gathered that you're telling me that there's no reason to expect that in Russia, there should be a huge figure. Of course, there is. And that soldier needs him and he's a decider.

Borges 02:12

But do you expect anything from Australia, for example? I don't see what you do. Patrick white. Well, I don't know him, sorry to say. He must remain. He.

interviewer 02:20

Won a Nobel prize. I believe in.

Borges 02:21

It. Well, if that means anything. No, of course, I shouldn't say that night, having wanted. No thank you. But maybe they needed an Australia. No, they needed a kangaroo.

interviewer 02:34

You have then no thesis that would explain why over a period of 50 years in Russia, there was the biggest spiritual conflagration in literary history. And then nothing. You.

Borges 02:47

Must say that in that case, the service was better. If they give us Tulsa and estoyeste and go over it may for good.

interviewer 02:57

Correct. But what was it that all of a sudden brought that whole movement, destroyed the inertia. Oh, is, is, is, it simply, is genius too rare to make it possible to formulate any rules about the incidence of this?

Borges 03:12

And then we have to fall back on Whistler. That happens or it doesn't.

博 提的六位：愛倫坡，梅爾維爾，惠特曼，霍桑，亨利詹姆斯，弗羅斯特。沙皇時(shí)期：托爾斯泰，陀翁，果戈里。最后引用惠斯特的話。

主持人：龐德（博:龐勉勉強(qiáng)強(qiáng)) ，聶魯達(dá)，索爾仁尼琴，帕特里克懷特。

彈幕：?？思{，菲茲杰拉德，馬雅科夫斯基，帕斯捷爾納克，阿赫瑪托娃，茨維塔耶娃，布爾加科夫，肖洛霍夫，阿斯塔菲耶夫，托洛司基，扎米亞京，布爾加科夫（魔幻現(xiàn)實(shí)鼻祖之一），克勒熱尼科夫，納博科夫，巴別爾，馬爾克斯，高爾基，奧斯特洛夫斯基，法捷耶夫，帕特里克.懷特，哈爾姆斯，安德列耶夫，法捷耶夫，契訶夫，普拉東諾夫，索爾仁尼琴。

提到的趣事，有空搜搜：1.博爾赫斯很不喜歡聶魯達(dá)的2.布氏是蘇聯(lián)不認(rèn)可的人，被隱藏起來了3.巴別爾，博對他評價(jià)甚4.00:01顧愷之是近代的大畫家。00:06他呢，提出了以形寫神的這個(gè)。00:12在中國化史上非常影響的理論。00:17顧愷之呢的這幅洛神兔呢？00:20

5.索爾憎惡蘇聯(lián)，只是他會批評所有當(dāng)權(quán)者

6.前面的，博爾赫斯地位沒有那么高，比不比得過亨利·詹姆斯都是個(gè)問題7.博將福克納著作翻譯成了西班牙語