The Call Of the Wild was written by Jack London. Men and girls from respectable families were spellbound by it. Jake London is born into a poor family, but he has his own dream and objective. He has had many jobs and learned from all the things in society. His abundant living experience is a very useful tool to achieve his books. Because of this, his books are full of masculinity. Maybe society makes a powerful hone to him, so his books are full of life breath. From his lifetime, I know that knowledge did not decide the stand or fall of a book. A bookworm cannot write a wonderful book. So we should pay attention to and observe our life.

The leading character, Buck, was just a normal dog. At first, Judge Miller was his master who was fond of him. And Buck lived a safe and leisurely life. But the trouble was brewing. In order to find yellow metal. Buck was caught by the gardener deputy and whipped on the train to Amsterdam. He struggled in fury, but it was futile. The man in red gave him a lesson on purpose. He used the club to beat Buck ruthless. So Buck knew that revolting is useless, he should adapt to the environment ----in the legal of club and fang to do. From then on, Buck had a big change. The change was slow, but it was changing. If Buck in Miller’s home was civilized, this lesson would make him know a little violence. Luckily, Buck fit it quickly. He learned to steal and the master did not discover his action. Then a symbol of his morality was broken. In Netherlands, under the law of love and fellowship, to respect private property and personal feelings; But in German, under a series of the laws of club and fang, who took such things into account was a fool, and so far as he observed them, he would fail to prosper. Buck learnt from his experience, his nature was aroused. Finally, his best master was killed by Yeehats. Out of being very angry, he killed them in a short while and he thought it was easy to do it. This discovery brought his true nature into full play. Ironically, it was civilized people who had caused his degeneration.

This book has a highlight. It writes nine dog panter stories. These stories are full of wit and humor and pleasing performances. Each dog had its unique character. Spitz looked affable, but actually he was cruel. Curly is a very kind dog, but she was killed by Spitz and other huskies. She paid the price of his life for his kindness to the cruel wolves. Dave and Francois were fair men, calm and impartial in administering justice, like human beings. After Buck killed Spitz, the master asked Francois to be the top of the dog. Buck did not allow it, but Francois did not care about it. And Dave gave the whole of his away to a worthy cause till it took your life ---- likes the Kitty.

Exactly, the most meaningful plot is the love and fellowship between Buck and John Thornton. John Thornton saved his life, concerning him a lot. Buck loved him and wanted to help him to do everything. For example, save his master in rapids, win in gambling and save his master in the wilderness. Then Buck became the leader of the wolves in the grey moonlight and the northern lights flickering. So we know, Buck’s wildness was completely fired up. He remembered the old memory of his progenitor. The theme of the article is obvious finally.

In my view,although Buck became the leader of the wolves, I don't think this book has a good ending. Jack London has written two books: The Sea Wolf and The Call of the Wild. The two books all mentioned “a big stick policy “. This polity in The Call of the Wild is successful, because the object is a dog. Actually,the blow of the stick and the change in the environment awakened Buck's wildness, so he became the wolves’ friends. But this polity in The Sea Wolf failed, because the object is human, which with human dignity and a sense of self. But we have also seen the revival of wilderness in the mind of the great intellectual Van Weeden, leading to a entire tragedy. When people feel helpless and upset, it is not impossible to turn from man to beast. That was the achievement of the big stick polity. This can make us ponder. We don't know if this situation has been repeated for a long time, will people's moral quality fall with it. Causes the degeneration and disintegration of the moral nature, let people think that the moral type is a kind of vanity, in the cruel competition for survival is a kind of obstacle, and retreat into the wilderness of the mind.