最美情侣中文字幕电影,在线麻豆精品传媒,在线网站高清黄,久久黄色视频

歡迎光臨散文網(wǎng) 會員登陸 & 注冊

CheckCIF-REFNR01

2020-05-22 07:00 作者:DJ_Tokyo  | 我要投稿

PROC-NAME: REFNR01 Type_3

PURPOSE: To check that the ratio of _refine_ls_number_reflns and _refine_ls_number_parameters is acceptable.

PROCEDURE:

CALCULATE

S = SIN [_diffrn_reflns_theta_max] / _diffrn_radiation_wavelength

RRRT = _refine_ls_number_reflns / _reflns_number_total

RRTP = _refine_ls_number_reflns / _refine_ls_number_parameters

TEST

IF S < 0.59 OR RRRT < 0.95

IF CENTROSYMMETRIC

RRTP < 10 issue ALERT C

?? "Alert C Ratio of reflections to parameters is < 10 for a centrosymmetric structure"

RRTP < 8 issue ALERT B

?? "Alert B Ratio of reflections to parameters is < 8 for a centrosymmetric structure"

RRTP < 6 issue ALERT A

?? "Alert A Ratio of reflections to parameters is < 6 for a centrosymmetric structure"

IF NON-CENTROSYMMETRIC

IF ZMAX > 18

RRTP < 10 issue ALERT C

?? "Alert C Ratio of reflections to parameters is < 10 for a non-centrosymmetric structure, where ZMAX > 18"

RRTP < 8 issue ALERT B

?? "Alert B Ratio of reflections to parameters is < 8 for a non-centrosymmetric structure, where ZMAX > 18"

RRTP < 6 issue ALERT A

?? "Alert A Ratio of reflections to parameters is < 6 for a non-centrosymmetric structure, where ZMAX > 18"

ELSE

RRTP < 8 issue ALERT C

?? "Alert C Ratio of reflections to parameters is < 8 for a non-centrosymmetric structure, where ZMAX < 18"

RRTP < 6 issue ALERT B

?? "Alert B Ratio of reflections to parameters is < 6 for a non-centrosymmetric structure, where ZMAX < 18"

RRTP < 4 issue ALERT A

?? "Alert A Ratio of reflections to parameters is < 4 for a non-centrosymmetric structure, where ZMAX < 18"

The ratio of reflections used in the refinement to refined parameters (the r/p ratio) is important for ensuring precise atomic and geometric parameters. Higher r/p ratios generally improve the precision.

It is expected that for centrosymmetric space groups, the r/p ratio should be at least 10:1. This also applies for non-centrosymmetric space groups when an element heavier than chlorine is present, because the heavy atom usually improves the diffracting power of the sample to an extent that makes it worthwhile to collect additional high angle data and thereby obtain higher r/p ratios.

For non-centrosymmetric space groups when only elements lighter than argon are present, it is expected that the r/p ratio should be at least 8:1.

If you are having difficulty obtaining a suitable r/p ratio, consider the following:

(a) Was theta(max) set high enough for the measurement? A theta(max) of 25 deg. for Mo radiation or 67 deg. for Cu radiation is the minimum requirement, but use higher theta(max) values if the crystal diffracts sufficiently.

(b) Consider using a low temperature measurement to improve the diffracting power and then collect to a higher theta(max).

(c) Check that the data are complete to your chosen theta(max) and that segments of the unique reflections are not missing. If data completeness is an issue leading to a low r/p ratio, you will receive a separate validation alert about that.

(d) Check that you are using all (or as many as feasible) of your reflection data in the refinement. If weak reflections are being omitted with a sigma threshold cutoff, such as the criterion defined under _reflns_threshold_expression (this may be particularly relevant for refinements based on F), then you should consider reducing the cutoff threshold as far as possible, or, preferably, use all reflections in the refinement.

(e) Reduce the number of refined parameters by, for example, not refining H-atoms, using restraints or constraints, or refining highly disordered or ill-behaved atoms isotropically.

Note that if you have measured data to at least sin(theta)/lambda of 0.6 (theta(max) = 25 deg. for Mo radiation; theta(max) = 67 deg. for Cu radiation) and you have used all available unique reflections in the refinement, the reflection/parameter test is not applied, because it is considered that you have measured an appropriate quantity of data and that you have made the best possible use of that data.

Also note that with light atom non-centrosymmetric structures where anomalous dispersion effects are insignificant, it is unwise to attempt to use unmerged Friedel-related reflections simply to boost the r/p ratio.

(http://journals.iucr.org/services/cif/checking/REFNR_01.html)

例:REFNR01_ALERT_3_C Ratio of reflections to parameters is < 8 for a

??????????? non-centrosymmetric structure, where ZMAX < 18

??????????? sine(theta)/lambda??????????? ??0.5556

??????????? Proportion of unique data used??? 1.0000

??????????? Ratio reflections to paraters?????? 6.3713

警告原因:衍射點/參數(shù)比不在預(yù)期范圍內(nèi)。

解決策略:給出合理解釋即可。


CheckCIF-REFNR01的評論 (共 條)

分享到微博請遵守國家法律
朔州市| 石泉县| 邹城市| 成都市| 福泉市| 苏尼特右旗| 镶黄旗| 科技| 旬阳县| 上虞市| 三原县| 大竹县| 临猗县| 天峻县| 凭祥市| 汪清县| 鄂伦春自治旗| 余姚市| 富源县| 曲周县| 雷州市| 北辰区| 安康市| 乾安县| 潼关县| 克东县| 新河县| 新巴尔虎右旗| 新源县| 大港区| 驻马店市| 抚松县| 海林市| 洛隆县| 荆州市| 龙泉市| 宁德市| 亚东县| 稻城县| 睢宁县| 兴海县|