????In every other science, the matter that it treats, and the scientifific method, are distinguished from each other; the content, moreover, does not make an absolute beginning but is dependent on other concepts and is connected on all sides with other material.

fact? ?the science of logic . matter? method? ;content? is dependent on? concepts / connected material

context? method.?

????Logic, on the contrary, cannot presuppose any of these forms of reflflection, these rules and laws of thinking, for they are part of its content and they fifirst have to be established within it.?

????What is anticipated in this Introduction, therefore, is not intended to ground as it were the concept of logic, or to justify in advance its content and method scientififically, but rather to make more intuitable, by means of some explanations and reflflections of an argumentative and historical nature, the standpoint from which this science ought to be considered.

Logic? ?can not? any reflection, these rules and laws of thinking? ?part of its content.? ?concept? content? result.

Logic? knowledge? the final result / completion.? ? subject matter, conceptual thinking, within it(Logic); concept? the course of this elaboration.

?not intended to ground, justify but? ? rather to? ?standpoint

????Whenever logic is taken as the science of thinking in general, it is thereby understood that this “thinking” constitutes the mere form of a cognition;

logic? ?the mere form of a cognition;? ?logic? ?content,? second constitutive

piece, matter; logic? , matter , the formal conditions of genuine knowledge; logic? ?pathway, the content, lies outside

it.? What is the relationship between cognition, matter and logic, content??