正文翻譯

Which is a better way to be healthy: being vegetarian or non-vegetarian?

哪種才是對健康更有益的方式：是素食還是非素食？

評論翻譯

Jinanand
According to Sramana(Jaina) scxtures,
A person possess a healthy and an attractive body and has a long lifespan on account of -
Naam(Body determining) karma
Vedaniya(Feeling producing) karma
Ayu(Lifespan determining) karma
So, it makes no sense to say that Non-vegetarians are healthier than Vegetarians. The same can be proved in many ways.
One can find many daily life examples where there are many Non-vegetarians who suffer from many serious health issues. The same is applicable to vegetarians as well. Everything is the interplay of your own karmas.
Having said that, it makes no sense to kill a 5 sensory living being for food.
Moreover there are considerable health and spiritual benefits from a Vegetarian diet(excluding eggs).
There are many people who think that vegetarian food does not provide sufficient protein. However, one can get sufficient protien from legumes, beans, daal, tofu, paneer, milk, sprouts etc that is required by human body.
As far as body building is concerned, though the protien sources from the vegetarian diet are lesser as compared to Non-vegetarian sources, one gets benefit of peaceful living as vegetarian food is considered as Sattvik. Also vegetarian food is mandatory for spiritual development.
Also, Vegetarian food is cheaper than Non-vegetarian food, thus it has higher ROI(Return on investment) than Non-veg food.
PEACE!

根據沙門（耆那）圣經的說法，
一個人擁有健康和迷人的身體，并擁有長壽的原因是：
1.Naam（決定身體的）業(yè)力
2.Vedaniya(產生感覺的)業(yè)力
3.Ayu（決定壽命的）業(yè)力
因此，說葷食者比素食者更健康是沒有意義的。這一點可以用很多方式來證明。
人們可以找到許多日常生活中的例子，其中有許多非素食主義者患有許多嚴重的健康問題。當然，同樣的情況也適用于素食者。一切都是你自己的業(yè)力的相互作用。
話雖如此，但為了食物而殺死一個有五感的生命是沒有意義的。
此外，素食（不包括雞蛋）對健康和精神有很大好處。
有很多人認為素食不能提供足夠的蛋白質。然而，人們可以從豆類，豆子，豆?jié){，豆腐，牛奶，芽菜等獲得人體所需要的足夠的蛋白質。
就身體建設而言，雖然素食的蛋白質來源比葷食少，但由于素食被認為是健康飲食，人們可以得到和平生活的好處。此外，素食是精神發(fā)展的必要條件。
最后，素食比葷食便宜，因此它的投資回報率比葷食高。
世界和平!

Christina Wilson
Prithvi, thank-you for saying it so well. I have been vegan for 32 years now, and as an old woman, I am always mistaken for someone who is young. I am almost 67 and am wonderfully healthy. I feel that this is my reward for having such compassion for animals.

Prithvi，謝謝你說得這么好。我吃素已經32年了，作為一個老婦人，我總是被誤認為是一個年輕的人。我現在快67歲了，身體非常健康。我覺得這是我對動物有如此同情心的回報。

Anand Oza
, lifelong vegetarian

，終身素食者

It's clear that, at least in theory, being vegetarian can't be better than being non-vegetarian, because your choices as a vegetarian are a subset of your choices as a non-vegetarian.
In practice, depending on your eating habits and willpower, being vegetarian might be a useful heuristic to avoid certain unhealthy non-vegetarian foods while increasing consumption of healthy vegetarian foods. (It could also backfire, by increasing consumption of unhealthy vegetarian foods in lieu of healthy non-vegetarian foods, especially if going out to eat at a restaurant with limited options.)

很明顯，至少在理論上，吃素不可能比吃葷好，因為你作為一個素食者的選擇只能是你作為一個非素食者的選擇里的一個子集。
在實踐中，根據你的飲食習慣和意志力，吃素可能是一個有用的啟發(fā)式方法，可以避免某些不健康的葷食，同時增加對健康素食的消費。(它也可能適得其反，增加不健康素食的消費，以代替健康的葷食，特別是在外出就餐時，只有有限的餐廳可以選擇)
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網 http://www.ltaaa.cn 轉載請注明出處

Raj Ranju
, Sentient human being, solving mysteries of good health, Diet planner, Fitness Enthusiast
Animal based proteins have better amino acid count than plant based proteins. (+1 meat diets)
Low carb diets (meat diets) are excellent for fat loss and muscle gain when compared to high carb diets (+1 meat diets)
Vegetarian diets have better fiber which animal based diets generally lack without supplementation (+1 veg diets)
There are no essential carbs, body can work without carbs by using fat and proteins, but there are essential fats and proteins (+1 meat diets)
Complex carbs don't cause insulin spikes and don't cause obesity; but neither does a low carb diet (+0 draw)
The wide variety of fruits and vegetables provide the most anti-oxidants, animal based diets lack this (+1 veg diets)
High GI carbs commonly found in sweets,rice,pizzas and breads cause insulin spikes which puts on body fat (+1 meat diets) (+0 if you only eat complex carbs)
So although meat diets score more than veg diets overall. the best approach would be a "Balanced diet" containing a good portion of meats and diary, supplemented by good fiber from salads and anti-oxidants from colored vegetables and fruits.

1.動物性蛋白質比植物性蛋白質有更好的氨基酸數量。(肉類飲食+1)
2.與高碳水化合物飲食相比，低碳水化合物飲食（肉類飲食）對減少脂肪和增加肌肉有很好的作用（肉類飲食+1）
3.素食有更好的纖維，在沒有補充的情況下，非素食飲食通常缺乏纖維（素食+1）。
4.沒有必要的碳水化合物，身體可以在沒有碳水化合物的情況下通過使用脂肪和蛋白質來運行，但前提是有必要的脂肪和蛋白質（+1肉類飲食）
5.復合碳水化合物不會導致胰島素激增，也不會導致肥胖；但低碳水化合物飲食也不會導致肥胖（+0平局）
6.種類繁多的水果和蔬菜提供了最多的抗氧化劑，非素食飲食缺乏這一點（素食飲食+1）
7.甜食、米飯、披薩和面包中常見的高GI碳水化合物會導致胰島素激增，從而增加身體脂肪（+1肉食飲食）（如果你只吃復合碳水化合物，則+0）。
因此，盡管肉類飲食的得分比蔬菜飲食的得分高，但最好的方法是"平衡飲食"，包含相當一部分的肉類和乳制品，并輔以沙拉中的良好纖維以及彩色蔬菜和水果中的抗氧化劑。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網 http://www.ltaaa.cn 轉載請注明出處

Diane Dougherty
If done right, a vegetarian or vegan diet provides high quantities of micronutrients that only comes from plants.
Plants provide enough bioavailable protein without affecting the kidneys. Also plants provide lots of fiber, which helps to clean the bowels and arteries.
If sticking with as much organic produce as you can, you won't have to worry about the effects of genetically modified foods that may or may not harm humans.

如果做得對，素食或純素飲食提供了大量只來自植物的微量營養(yǎng)素。
植物提供足夠的生物可利用性蛋白質而不影響腎臟。此外，植物還提供大量纖維，這有助于清潔腸道和動脈。
如果盡可能多地堅持使用有機產品，你就不必擔心轉基因食品的影響，這些轉基因食品可能會或可能不會傷害人類。

Kathleen Robertson
, studied at St. Thomas School, New Delhi

，曾就讀于新德里的圣托馬斯學校
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網 http://www.ltaaa.cn 轉載請注明出處

Non vegetarian food has the best absorable protein contend and it is necessary for under nourished. There is no meaning in opening a debate and we have to accept the fact both foods are necessary to be taken by people to balance.

非素食有著最好的可吸收的蛋白質，對營養(yǎng)不良的人來說是必要的。開展辯論沒有任何意義，我們必須接受這樣一個事實，即兩種食物都是人們必須服用的，以達到平衡。