OG3社科 公共交通
文章分析:
Blurb:?
Straphanger


para 1:?
Though there are 600 million cars on the planet,
and?counting, there are also seven billion people,
which means that for the vast majority of us getting
around involves taking buses, ferryboats, commuter
trains, streetcars, and subways. In other words,
traveling to work, school, or the market means being
a straphanger: somebody who, by choice or necessity,
relies on public transport, rather than a privately
owned automobile.
大多數(shù)人還是使用公共交通的;
para 2:?
Half the population of New York, Toronto, and
London do not own cars. Public transport is how
most of the people of Asia and Africa, the world’s
most populous continents, travel. Every day, subway
systems carry 155 million passengers, thirty-four
times the number carried by all the world’s airplanes,
and the global public transport market is now valued
at $428 billion annually. A century and a half after
the invention of the internal combustion engine,
private car ownership is still an anomaly.
私家車還是少的;
para 3:?
And yet public transportation, in many minds, is
the opposite of?glamour—a?squalid?last resort for
those with one too many impaired driving charges,
too poor to afford insurance, or too?decrepit?to get
behind the wheel of a car. In much of North
America, they are right: taking transit is a depressing
experience. Anybody who has waited far too long on
a street corner for the privilege of boarding a
lurching, overcrowded bus, or wrestled luggage onto
subways and shuttles to get to a big city airport,
knows that transit on this continent tends to be
underfunded, ill-maintained, and ill-planned. Given
the opportunity, who wouldn’t drive? Hopping in a
car almost always gets you to your destination more
quickly.
但是公共交通的不好讓人們選擇開車;【讓步段】
glamour 魅力
squalid /?skwɑ?l?d/?

para 4:?
It doesn’t have to be like this. Done right, public
transport can be faster, more comfortable, and
cheaper than the private automobile.?In Shanghai,
German-made magnetic?levitation?trains skim over
elevated tracks at 266 miles an hour,?whisking?people
to the airport at a third of the speed of sound.?In
provincial French towns, electric-powered streetcars
run silently on rubber tires, sliding through narrow
streets along a single guide rail set into cobblestones.
From Spain to Sweden, Wi-Fi equipped high-speed
trains seamlessly connect with highly ramified metro
networks, allowing commuters to work on laptops as
they prepare for same-day meetings in once distant
capital cities.?In Latin America, China, and India,
working people board fast-loading buses that move
like subway trains along dedicated busways, leaving
the sedans and SUVs of the rich?mired?in
dawn-to-dusk traffic jams.?And some cities?have
transformed their streets into cycle-path freeways,
making giant strides in public health and safety and
the sheer livability of their neighborhoods—in the
process turning the workaday bicycle into a viable
form of mass transit.
公共交通可以變得更好;
para 5:?
If you credit the demographers, this transit trend
has legs. The “Millenials,” who reached adulthood
around the turn of the century and now outnumber
baby boomers, tend to favor cities over suburbs, and
are far more willing than their parents to ride buses
and subways. Part of the reason is their ease with
iPads, MP3 players, Kindles, and smartphones: you
can get some serious texting done when you’re not
driving, and earbuds offer effective insulation from
all but the most extreme commuting annoyances.
Even though there are more teenagers in the country
than ever, only ten million have a driver’s license
(versus twelve million a generation ago).?/?Baby
boomers may have been raised in?Leave It to Beaver
suburbs, but as they retire, a significant?contingent?is
favoring older cities and compact towns where they
have the option of walking and riding bikes. Seniors,
too, are more likely to use transit, and by 2025, there
will be 64 million Americans over the age of
sixty-five. Already, dwellings in older neighborhoods
in Washington, D.C., Atlanta, and Denver, especially
those near light-rail or subway stations, are
commanding enormous price premiums over
suburban homes. The experience of European and
Asian cities shows that if you make buses, subways,
and trains convenient, comfortable, fast, and safe, a
surprisingly large percentage of citizens will opt to
ride rather than drive.
Leave It to Beaver
a US?television?programme?that was?popular?in the late 1950s and?early?1960s, about a?boy?called?Beaver?Cleaver?and his?family, who lived in a?typical?suburban?area
人口統(tǒng)計學(xué)家發(fā)現(xiàn)年輕人、老年人都更加愿意選擇公共交通。
題型解析:
11 結(jié)構(gòu)題之段落功能題
就是選讓步段的作用
12?直接細(xì)節(jié),緊踩原文
13 上一題定位
14 主旨題之段落大意
15 上題定位
16?單詞意思
17?單詞意思
18 獨(dú)立循證
19 圖表題 干擾是D,數(shù)據(jù)無法體現(xiàn)頻率。
20 圖表題
作者簡介:
Taras Grescoe
Taras Grescoe was born in 1967. He writes essays, articles, and books. He is something of a non-fiction specialist.

In his internationally acclaimed book?Straphanger?(Henry Holt, HarperCollins), Grescoe visited fourteen cities around the world, from Bogotá to Tokyo, to look at which places are getting the sustainable mobility formula right. He is also a leading voice on urbanism, whose writing on cities has appeared on the op-ed page of the?New York Times, The Guardian, Monocle,?and?The Atlantic's CityLab. A familiar presence on CBC radio,?television, and NPR, he has been named one of the top influencers on the theme of urban transportation on Twitter.
op-ed:?short for?opposite?editorial,?the?page of special features usually opposite the editorial page?that contains?comment on the news and articles on particular?subjects?(報紙的)專欄版,評論版
For more info:?
http://tarasgrescoe.com/index.html