BV1Vu4y1B7BE評(píng)論補(bǔ)檔

對(duì)Grover Furr其人的學(xué)術(shù)考察，下面簡(jiǎn)單介紹下這位主攻中世紀(jì)英國(guó)文學(xué)的教授的觀點(diǎn)：

1. In a CounterPunch article published in March 2017, Furr argues that "【t】here was a very serious famine in the USSR, including (but not limited to) the Ukrainian SSR, in 1932-33. But there has never been any evidence of a 'Holodomor' or 'deliberate famine,' and there is none today. The 'Holodomor' fiction was invented by Ukrainian Nazi collaborators who found havens in Western Europe, Canada, and the USA after the war."

翻譯：此君認(rèn)為不存在烏克蘭大饑荒

2. Furr believes that all defendants in the Moscow Trials were at least guilty of what they were charged, as argued in a 2017 article for Journal of Labor and Society, a quarterly journal published by Brill.

翻譯：此君認(rèn)為對(duì)于莫斯科大審判中被清洗的蘇共高層全部罪名屬實(shí)

3. In 2012, Furr stated that the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact was signed by the Soviet Union to preserve an independent Poland rather than planning a partition of Poland, as was in fact stipulated in the secret protocol of the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union.

翻譯：此君認(rèn)為里賓特洛甫-莫洛托夫條約是為了確保波蘭獨(dú)立

4. Regarding the Soviet invasion of Poland in September 1939, Furr stated in 2009 that the Soviet Union did not actually invade the Second Polish Republic because Poland no longer had a government and was not a state according to international law, further stating that "at the time it was widely acknowledged that no such invasion occurred."

翻譯：此君認(rèn)為蘇聯(lián)沒(méi)有入侵波蘭，他們只是去接收已經(jīng)沒(méi)有政府了的土地

5. Contrary to the historical consensus and as stated by both the Soviet Union (in 1991) and the Russian Federation (in 2004), Furr denies Soviet complicity in the Katyn massacre, arguing in a 2013 article in the Socialism and Democracy academic peer-reviewed journal that the Katyn massacre was committed by the Nazi Schutzstaffel rather than by the Soviet NKVD. In 2010, Furr said that he believed the widely accepted view until the discoveries in the mass graves at Volodymyr-Volynskyi, which he says prove his thesis. According to Furr, some Poles that were implicated in Polish war crimes against Soviet POWs during 1919–1921, were likely killed by the Soviets while Nazis shot the others later.

翻譯：此君認(rèn)為卡廷是德佬干的，但是蘇聯(lián)人先槍斃了一些在1919-21年對(duì)抗過(guò)俄羅斯的波蘭戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)罪罪犯（大噓）

6.Furr's book Khrushchev Lied, subtitled "The Evidence that Every Revelation of Stalin's (and Beria's) Crimes in Nikita Khrushchev's Infamous Secret Speech to the 20th Party Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union on February 25, 1956, Is Provably False", attacked the speech given by Nikita Khrushchev called "On the Cult of Personality and Its Consequences", more commonly referred to in the West as the "Secret Speech" because it was delivered at an unpublicized closed session of party delegates, with guests and members of the press excluded. According to Sven-Eric Holmstrom, "Furr identifies 61 allegations in Khrushchev's speech. He concludes that, with only one minor exception, every one of them is demonstrably false. In essence Furr claims to have proven that this 'speech of the century' is a fraud from beginning to end."

翻譯：此君認(rèn)為玉米人的秘密報(bào)告全是假話和中傷，斯帶林永遠(yuǎn)正確

7.此君認(rèn)為蘇聯(lián)驅(qū)逐少數(shù)民族是英明正確的

8.Cathy Young, describing Furr in an article for The Daily Beast as "a 'revisionist' on a career-long quest to exonerate Stalin", said that Furr's work, along with that of Douglas Tottle, was being used as part of a larger propaganda campaign by the Russian government to muddy the waters and obfuscate the history of Soviet crimes.

翻譯：其他學(xué)者認(rèn)為這人純粹斯帶林腦殘粉而且被俄羅斯現(xiàn)任政府用來(lái)施展歲月史書(shū)

9. 眾人皆醉我獨(dú)醒? 此君認(rèn)為主流蘇聯(lián)歷史學(xué)界全是騙子

?

這種學(xué)者我持中立態(tài)度，但是從其過(guò)去的學(xué)術(shù)成果和專(zhuān)業(yè)領(lǐng)域來(lái)看，呃呃這是否

剩下的反駁和考據(jù)我有空再做，畢竟我是個(gè)忙著打游戲的懶狗