? ? ? ? 摘要：此文無(wú)法在專業(yè)期刊發(fā)表，依然采用科普類型。最近看到許多量子力學(xué)的報(bào)道，對(duì)量子力學(xué)關(guān)鍵證據(jù)，“貝爾不等式”談點(diǎn)個(gè)人想法，貝爾不等式只說(shuō)明一個(gè)問題，人類在基礎(chǔ)物理領(lǐng)域的研究錯(cuò)誤理論和混亂。同樣采用中英文，面向全球讀者。

? ? ? ?物理學(xué)家玻爾，在量子力學(xué)誕生之初，曾和愛因斯坦有過一場(chǎng)世紀(jì)之爭(zhēng)，涉及量子力學(xué)的理論基礎(chǔ)及哲學(xué)思想方面。哥本哈根學(xué)派的科學(xué)家認(rèn)為量子力學(xué)的三大基本原則：疊加態(tài)、不確定性和觀察者效應(yīng)。但是以愛因斯坦卻不贊同。約翰·斯圖爾特·貝爾在1964年發(fā)表的論文《論EPR佯謬》表明，在愛因斯坦的EPR思想實(shí)驗(yàn)中，量子力學(xué)的預(yù)測(cè)明顯地不同于定域性隱變量理論。在論文中他提出了“貝爾不等式”。

? ? ? ?1972年，S. J.弗里德曼和J. F.克勞澤進(jìn)行了第一個(gè)貝爾不等式驗(yàn)證實(shí)驗(yàn)，結(jié)果支持量子力學(xué)。30多年來(lái)，眾多實(shí)驗(yàn)結(jié)果均支持量子力學(xué)，而與隱變量理論不符。2015年，荷蘭代爾夫特理工大學(xué)R.韓森領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的小組進(jìn)行了幾乎無(wú)漏洞的貝爾不等式驗(yàn)證，基本宣告了隱變量理論的失敗。

? ? ? 我簡(jiǎn)單談一下，目前人類對(duì)量子力學(xué)的誤區(qū)

? ? ? 第一、波粒二象性

? ? ? 這是導(dǎo)致產(chǎn)生各種相互矛盾理論的根源所在。“光”并不存在波粒二象性，人類目前對(duì)“光”認(rèn)知，只是最簡(jiǎn)單的認(rèn)識(shí)，“光”的本質(zhì)遠(yuǎn)超過人類目前的想象，其本質(zhì)論述就會(huì)有一系列不同深度的表述，其知識(shí)遠(yuǎn)超人類認(rèn)知，并非一篇文章能表述全面的。只是可惜，學(xué)術(shù)界不愿意相信。我也沒有必要過多描述。

? ? ? ?第二、量子糾纏

? ? ? ?愛因斯坦提出了著名的“EPR佯謬”，他也就是直覺判斷。量子糾纏的本質(zhì)涉及到“維度”的概念。人類目前對(duì)物質(zhì)認(rèn)知，也只限于時(shí)間、空間，對(duì)物質(zhì)涉及的“維度”概念，并無(wú)明確的闡述，在數(shù)學(xué)上提出了想象的“維度”概念。人類距離理解差的太遠(yuǎn)，沒必要深入描述。

? ? ? ?真正的數(shù)學(xué)與物理是一體的，如果數(shù)學(xué)不能與物理結(jié)合，結(jié)果只是數(shù)學(xué)家的邏輯游戲，空洞毫無(wú)用途，這也是學(xué)術(shù)界的現(xiàn)狀。簡(jiǎn)單談兩點(diǎn)。

? ? ? ?一是，在人類太空探索中，對(duì)飛行器的定位問題。目前人類數(shù)學(xué)是從空間點(diǎn)、線、面、體積而建立，在實(shí)際運(yùn)用上毫無(wú)用途，只是理論值，必須依靠空間的天鏈對(duì)飛行器進(jìn)行定位，真正的數(shù)學(xué)，可以在地面的控制中心實(shí)時(shí)計(jì)算出飛行器的各種參數(shù)，對(duì)飛行器進(jìn)行準(zhǔn)確定位追蹤，不會(huì)有任何的偏差。

? ? ? ? 二是、目前人類已經(jīng)進(jìn)行了“量子通訊”，我無(wú)法見到專業(yè)文獻(xiàn)，從非專業(yè)的描述中，了解到相關(guān)原理。只說(shuō)一點(diǎn)，人類對(duì)通訊的運(yùn)用，從電磁波到“量子通訊”，只是最原始的方式。這些通訊方式，根本無(wú)法在宇宙探索中使用，從發(fā)射到接收，根本無(wú)法在浩瀚宇宙中使用，信號(hào)不會(huì)傳播很遠(yuǎn)。真正的通訊方式，人類根本無(wú)法想象，人類還有漫長(zhǎng)的道路需要探索。同樣沒必要深入描述。

? ? ? ??第三、疊加態(tài)、不確定性

? ? ???這個(gè)兩個(gè)問題導(dǎo)致出現(xiàn)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)，發(fā)展到量子統(tǒng)計(jì)等學(xué)科，這根本就是沒有搞清楚物質(zhì)形成而造成的。物質(zhì)形成并非人類認(rèn)知那樣，有許多層次，人類根本不知道其存在，它們是同時(shí)作用的，對(duì)其認(rèn)知需要天文的時(shí)間，同樣沒必要深入描述。

? ? ? ?第四、觀察者效應(yīng)

? ? ????這涉及到人類的意識(shí)問題，正如人類二元對(duì)立思想，把“物質(zhì)”與“意識(shí)”對(duì)立起來(lái)，產(chǎn)生“唯物論”和“唯心論”兩種對(duì)立哲學(xué)思想，在幾個(gè)世紀(jì)之內(nèi)能解決就不錯(cuò)了。

? ? ? ?第五、貝爾不等式

? ? ? ?這個(gè)原理就是人類在對(duì)宇宙錯(cuò)誤認(rèn)知的基礎(chǔ)上誕生的，進(jìn)行了所謂的實(shí)驗(yàn)驗(yàn)證，為自己的錯(cuò)誤理論找到了合理存在理由。

? ? ? ? 綜上所述，量子力學(xué)發(fā)展到今天，取得了一些成果，但對(duì)其本質(zhì)人類并不清楚其背后的原理，原因人類在基礎(chǔ)物理領(lǐng)域的研究錯(cuò)誤理論導(dǎo)致。

張瀟耀

2023年7月25日

寫于中國(guó)新疆克拉瑪依市

?

Look at the misunderstanding of quantum mechanics from Bell's inequality

Zhang Xiaoyao

Abstract: This article cannot be published in professional journals, and still uses popular science types. Recently, I have seen many reports of quantum mechanics and key evidence of quantum mechanics. Talking about personal ideas in "Bells", Bell's inequality only illustrates one problem. Human beings in the field of basic physics are wrong theory and chaos. It also adopts Chinese and English, facing readers worldwide.

In the beginning of the birth of quantum mechanics, Bohr, a physicist, had a century of disputes with Einstein, involving the theoretical foundation and philosophical ideas of quantum mechanics. The scientists of the Copenhagen School believe that the three basic principles of quantum mechanics are: superposition, uncertainty, and observer effect. But Einstein disagrees. John Stuart Bell's paper published in 1964 "On EPR Paradox" shows that in Einstein's EPR ideological experiments, the prediction of quantum mechanics is obviously different from the theory of regional hidden variables. In the dissertation, he proposed the "Bells".

In 1972, S. Friedman and J. F. Klazer performed the first Bell Rejuvenation Experiment to support quantum mechanics. For more than 30 years, many experiments have supported quantum mechanics, and they do not match the theory of hidden variables. In 2015, the group led by R. Hansen, a Dutch University of Technology, conducted almost no loopholes in Bell.

Let me briefly talk about the misunderstanding of quantum mechanics at present

First, wave particle mimage

This is the root cause of various contradictory theories. "Light" does not have the duality of waves. Humanity is currently recognized by "light". It is just the simplest understanding. The essence of "light" far exceeds the current imagination of human beings. The essential discussion will have a series of different depth expressions. The knowledge far exceeds human cognition, not an article that can comprehensively. It's just a pity that the academic community is unwilling to believe. I don't need to describe too much.

Second, quantum entanglement

Einstein proposed the famous "EPR paradox", which was the intuitive judgment. The essence of quantum entanglement involves the concept of "dimension". Human awareness of material is limited to time and space. The concept of "dimension" involved in material does not have a clear explanation. It proposes the concept of "dimension" in mathematics. Human distance understanding is too far away, and there is no need to describe in -depth.

True mathematics and physics are one. If mathematics cannot be combined with physics, the result is only a logical game of mathematicians. The empty cavity is useless. This is also the status quo of the academic world. Talk to two points.

First, in human space exploration, the positioning of the aircraft. At present, human mathematics is established from space points, lines, planes, and volumes. It is useless in actual use. It is only the theoretical value. It must rely on the space chain of the space to locate the aircraft. Real mathematics can calculate the various parameters of the aircraft in real time in the ground control center.

Second, human beings have currently conducted "quantum communication". I cannot see professional literature. From a non -professional description, I understand the relevant principles. Just say, the use of human beings from electromagnetic waves to "quantum communication" is just the most primitive way. These communication methods cannot be used in the exploration of the universe. From launch to receiving, it cannot be used in the vast universe at all, and the signal will not spread far. In the real communication method, humans cannot imagine at all, and human beings still have a long road to explore. There is no need to describe in -depth descriptions.

?? Third, superposition state, uncertainty

?? These two problems have led to statistics and developing disciplines such as quantum statistics, which is simply caused by the formation of material formation. Material formation is not as human cognition. There are many levels. Human beings do not know their existence. They are at the same time. They do not need to describe the time when their cognition requires astronomy.

??? Fourth, the observer effect

??? This involves the issue of human consciousness, just as human dual -opposite thoughts, and opposing "material" and "consciousness", producing "materialism" and "idealism", two opposite philosophical ideas, which can be solved within several centuries.

Fifth, Bell Unfinrsement

This principle is that human beings were born on the basis of the misunderstanding of the universe. The so -called experimental verification was performed, and a reasonable reasons for their own errors were found.

In summary, the development of quantum mechanics has achieved some achievements to this day, but it is not clear about the principle behind them in the essence of human beings, because human beings have caused the error theory of the research errors in the basic physics field.

Zhang Xiaoyao

July 25, 2023

Write in Karamay, Xinjiang, China