以下為機(jī)翻內(nèi)容：

裝甲車輛

問(wèn):眾所周知的Bob Semple坦克?是否有可能被添加到游戲科技樹(shù)中？或者作為一個(gè)活動(dòng)車輛? 許多社區(qū)的成員會(huì)非常高興看到它以某種形式添加到游戲。

答:目前我們沒(méi)有這個(gè)計(jì)劃。

問(wèn):我們聽(tīng)到有關(guān)日本重型坦克的消息已經(jīng)有一段時(shí)間了。 有仍計(jì)劃增加更多的嗎? 是因?yàn)槿狈π畔? o-1會(huì)作為一種罕見(jiàn)的活動(dòng)載具嗎?

答:是的,我們還沒(méi)有這些武器足夠的資料,,是不可能找到詳細(xì)的信息。 會(huì)有太多的猜測(cè)和圖紙的設(shè)計(jì),我們希望避免。

問(wèn):你提到計(jì)劃為意大利C1 preserie,這是否意味著法國(guó)的勒克萊爾原型/早期系列也可能很快被加入到科技樹(shù)中? 當(dāng)他們真的會(huì)落后。

我們已經(jīng)說(shuō)過(guò),我們有比AMX-40更復(fù)雜的和更現(xiàn)代化的法國(guó)坦克。 具體時(shí)間未來(lái)會(huì)在博客的中發(fā)布。

問(wèn):前一段時(shí)間,你說(shuō)黑豹II和虎II 105毫米將被移除和替換。 這是仍然如此嗎?

a計(jì)劃正在進(jìn)行; 他們離開(kāi)游戲之前，我們需要準(zhǔn)備幾臺(tái)替換車輛,直到他們都準(zhǔn)備好了,我們不能只是刪除。

問(wèn):B1 Centauro進(jìn)一步變異有待探索。 120毫米炮和SPAAG?Draco變種可能嗎? OTOMATIC和Draco也有類似的武器系統(tǒng)。

答:我們不排除這些可能性。

問(wèn):因?yàn)槿毡鞠喈?dāng)有限的選擇,是否有可能獲得RankV / VI SPG車輛? 也許75式155毫米榴彈炮或16式坦克殲擊車?

是的,日本戰(zhàn)后的裝甲車并不多,都在考慮的范圍內(nèi)。 我們已經(jīng)在研究。

問(wèn):春季活動(dòng)中已經(jīng)出現(xiàn)以色列坦克，它們都是優(yōu)質(zhì)的，屬于完全不同的國(guó)家。 有可能創(chuàng)建一個(gè)完整國(guó)家的科技樹(shù),包括西方和蘇聯(lián)、混合設(shè)計(jì),當(dāng)然,還有自己的Merkava系列，為什么要浪費(fèi)這種潛力呢？

答:分支要求一個(gè)獨(dú)立的國(guó)家,而具體,不幸的是,以色列武器不滿足這些需求。 不可能使一個(gè)完整的研究樹(shù)的地面部隊(duì)(或飛機(jī))的國(guó)家。 所以我們選擇當(dāng)前方法,我們不認(rèn)為是浪費(fèi)的潛力。 恰恰相反,因?yàn)椴煌瑖?guó)家的玩家可以嘗試以色列坦克。

問(wèn):目前,當(dāng)發(fā)射通古斯卡2 s6防空武器時(shí),玩家必須猜測(cè)引導(dǎo)向飛機(jī)開(kāi)火。 在現(xiàn)實(shí)中,2 s6操作員將目標(biāo)鎖定后，導(dǎo)彈會(huì)自行飛向目標(biāo)，?這是一個(gè)特別的游戲特性或平衡要求嗎? 這種機(jī)制會(huì)得到改善嗎?

答:這是一個(gè)現(xiàn)實(shí)的實(shí)施。 要計(jì)算目標(biāo)撞擊點(diǎn),你需要得到目標(biāo)的距離(使用目標(biāo)跟蹤系統(tǒng)測(cè)量)和導(dǎo)彈的距離。 通古斯導(dǎo)彈不是轉(zhuǎn)發(fā)器,目標(biāo)跟蹤系統(tǒng)不測(cè)量與導(dǎo)彈的距離。 因此,我們使用三點(diǎn)制導(dǎo)算法。

飛機(jī)

Q。 “復(fù)仇者”和“盲目捕獵”秩序中經(jīng)常使用空氣RB發(fā)現(xiàn)最后一個(gè)敵人飛機(jī)(鎖定20公里遠(yuǎn)的目標(biāo))。 你有打算改變它嗎? 還是一個(gè)特性,而不是bug ?

答:這不是一個(gè)錯(cuò)誤。

問(wèn):可以添加混合推進(jìn)飛機(jī)嗎? 游戲引擎能夠支持和計(jì)算一架飛機(jī)中的兩個(gè)不同發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)的功率和推力? 例如:Mikoyan-Gurevich i-250(有時(shí)稱為Samolet N); Vultee XP-81(有時(shí)稱為ZXF-81);寇蒂斯XF15C?; 瑞安FR?Fireball。

答:是的,這些飛機(jī)可以添加,創(chuàng)建一個(gè)混合電廠的問(wèn)題不是不能解決的。

問(wèn):日本ho - 103 12.7毫米機(jī)槍彈藥。幾個(gè)bug報(bào)告已經(jīng)提交, 但與歷史記載不同。根據(jù)IJAAF 1942指令，AP-T / AP-T—是默認(rèn)引信。 彈藥帶基于歷史,還是因?yàn)橛螒蚱胶? 開(kāi)發(fā)人員知道日本fuzeless稱它為特殊燃燒彈嗎?

答:并不是所有的彈帶都是歷史的,特別是對(duì)“默認(rèn)”腰帶。 是的,一些彈藥確實(shí)使用過(guò)一段時(shí)間,但不是全部。 是的,我們知道日本12.7毫米子彈爆炸沒(méi)有保險(xiǎn)絲,但在這樣一個(gè)口徑高爆彈藥都有相似的驚人效果,尤其是輕布雷達(dá)12.7毫米機(jī)槍。 因此,我們并沒(méi)有************。 在游戲中，玩家將看不到差異。

問(wèn):德國(guó)有自己的獨(dú)特版本的菲亞特G.91喜歡和30毫米炮G.91R / 3。 現(xiàn)在正在增加Rank V的保費(fèi),未來(lái)是否會(huì)考慮添加這架飛機(jī)??

答:是的,我們有這架德國(guó)飛機(jī)的計(jì)劃。

問(wèn):許多空對(duì)空導(dǎo)彈添加到最新更新的1.85中，它們?cè)诠艮Z炸機(jī)時(shí)效果非常好。 他們對(duì)付戰(zhàn)斗機(jī)并不是非常有效,所以飛機(jī)像標(biāo)槍(這是專用的全天候截?fù)魴C(jī))這樣的飛機(jī)無(wú)法發(fā)揮真正的用途。 你以前講過(guò)的更高級(jí)CAS飛機(jī)的計(jì)劃,對(duì)于6級(jí)轟炸機(jī)有什么計(jì)劃嗎？如Vulcan, Victor, Valiant, Tu-16和B-52 / Tu-95? 這在戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)雷霆中將非常有趣。

答:當(dāng)我們談?wù)摳冗M(jìn)的飛機(jī)時(shí),我們并不是指重型/戰(zhàn)略轟炸機(jī),而是亞音速攻擊機(jī)或戰(zhàn)斗轟炸機(jī)。 B-52這種飛機(jī)將會(huì)有特殊的用途。

問(wèn):我覺(jué)得轟炸機(jī)上的槍手似乎變得更糟了。 他們幾乎沒(méi)有注意到接近的飛機(jī)。你不覺(jué)得新飛機(jī)和導(dǎo)彈出現(xiàn)后,機(jī)槍手應(yīng)該得到升級(jí)?

答:機(jī)槍手沒(méi)有任何具體的變化。

直升機(jī)

問(wèn):MI-4V是一個(gè)非常不受歡迎的直升機(jī)。 即使升級(jí)也不是那么有趣。 是否有計(jì)劃增加額外的初級(jí)直升機(jī)來(lái)緩解呢?

米- 8之前,米- 4儲(chǔ)備是直升機(jī)。 它扮演初始直升機(jī)的角色,完全符合它的要求。 沒(méi)有計(jì)劃改變蘇聯(lián)直升機(jī)科技樹(shù)。

問(wèn):增加更豐富的直升機(jī)戰(zhàn)斗。比如護(hù)航任務(wù),你可能需要援助貨物和運(yùn)輸部隊(duì)，像CH-47支奴干或米- 26?

答:也許將來(lái)會(huì)有。

你預(yù)見(jiàn)到有些國(guó)家的直升機(jī)目前還沒(méi)有在游戲中被添加？?如Denel Rooivalk(南非)或T129 ATAK(土耳其)?

是的,有這種可能。?

海軍

問(wèn)：有布雷艦的新聞嗎? 我們?cè)?strong>測(cè)試期間見(jiàn)到過(guò)VS-8測(cè)試期間事件,但后來(lái)就沒(méi)消息了。

答:是的,我們沒(méi)有忘記或取消水雷，我們目前的計(jì)劃是讓那些可以使用水雷的軍艦成為替換武器之一(例如深水炸彈)。

問(wèn):德國(guó)S-boats非常好,但是有計(jì)劃添加更多的變種嗎? 比如S-7 S-10或S-13級(jí)?

答:是的,我們不排除這些可能性。但這些都是低級(jí)的船只,武器很弱。

問(wèn):就法國(guó)而言,在日本和意大利后很快將無(wú)法獲得完整的科技樹(shù)，我們有可能很快看到一些優(yōu)質(zhì)的艦船？像意大利地面部隊(duì)那樣? (P40和M26是在前一年添加到科技樹(shù)給玩家使用)

答:現(xiàn)在談?wù)撍€為時(shí)過(guò)早。

其他

問(wèn):擊殺視角非常不錯(cuò),但它打破了現(xiàn)有的煙霧機(jī)制,在機(jī)槍的幫助下可以看到煙霧后的敵人。 你會(huì)修改這個(gè)嗎?

答:我們已經(jīng)多次與我們的團(tuán)隊(duì)討論這個(gè)問(wèn)題,但沒(méi)有找到比現(xiàn)在更滿意的解決方案。它有它的優(yōu)點(diǎn)和缺點(diǎn)。

問(wèn):你想要添加溢價(jià)船只戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)債券商店嗎?

答:他們已經(jīng)存在! 看看五月份的戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)債券。

原文：

Q. Would it be possible for the well known Bob Semple Tank? to be added into the game on a tech tree, or perhaps as an event vehicle? ?It is a vehicle that many members of the community would be very happy to see added to the game in some form.

A. ???At the moment we have no plans for this tank.

Q. It's been some time since we heard any news on further Japanese Heavy tanks. Are there still plans to add more? Is there a lack of info? What about the O-I being added as a rare event machine?

A. ???Yes, we still do not have enough information on these machines, and as far as is possible to judge, it is impossible to find the missing info. There will be too much room for guesswork and paper design, which we would like to avoid.

Q. You mentioned plans for the C1 preserie for Italy, does this mean a prototype/early series of the Leclerc is also possible soon for France? As they will really fall behind.

A. ???We have already said that we have more sophisticated and modern French tanks than the AMX-40 in development. When? Look forward to the publication of future development blogs.

Q. Some time ago, you said that the Panther II and Tiger II 105mm were going to be removed and replaced. Is this still the case?

A. ???Plans are in motion; just in order to get the equipment out of the game, we need several replacement machines ready, and until they are all ready, we cannot just remove these.

Q. The B1 Centauro has further variants yet to be explored. Are the 120mm gun and SPAAG Draco variants possible? The Draco has a similar weapon system to the OTOMATIC.

A. ???We do not exclude the possibility of these machines.

Q. Since Japan is rather limited for choice, do you have any possible vehicles in mind for a Rank V/VI SPG? Perhaps the Type 75 155mm Howitzer or Type 16 Tank Destroyer?

A. ???Yes, almost all Japanese post-war armoured vehicles, and there are not so many of them, are considered for introduction. We are already working on some.

Q. The game already has several Israeli tank modifications and they’re all premium and belong to different nations. Why squander such potential when it’s possible to create a full nation with a unique tech tree, including armoured vehicles from both the Western and Soviet schools, hybrid designs and, of course, its own Merkava line?

A. The branch requirements for a separate nation are rather specific and, unfortunately, the Israeli arsenal does not meet these requirements.?It’s impossible to make a full research tree of ground forces (or aircraft) for this nation. So, we’ve chosen the current method, which we don’t consider to be a waste of potential. Quite the opposite, as players of different nations can try the Israeli tanks.

Q. Currently, when launching the Tunguska 2S6 anti-aircraft weapon, the player has to guess at the lead when firing at aircraft. In reality, 2S6 operators hold the target on the centre mark and the missile itself flies at the target. Is this a specific in-game feature or a balancing requirement? Will this mechanic be improved?

A. This is a realistic implementation. To calculate the target impact point, you need both the distance to the target (measured with the target tracking system) and the distance to your missile. Tunguska missiles aren’t transponders, and the target tracking system doesn’t measure distance to the missile. Therefore, we use a three-point guidance algorithm.

Aircraft

Q. "Avenger" and "Blind Hunt" order are often used in Air RB to spot the last enemy aircraft (both orders mark the target even 20km away from any enemy). Do you have plans to change it? Or is it a feature, and not a bug?

A. ???This is not a bug.

Q. Can aircraft with Mixed Propulsion be added? Is the game engine able to support and calculate the power and thrust of two different engines in one aircraft? For example: Mikoyan-Gurevich I-250 (sometimes called Samolet N); Consolidated Vultee XP-81 (sometimes marked as ZXF-81);Curtiss XF15C?; Ryan FR Fireball.

A. Yes, some of these aircraft can be added, the question of creating a mixed power plant is not unsolvable for the game.

Q. Japanese 12.7 mm Ho-103 machine gun ammo. Several bug reports have already been submitted, but it differs from history. AP-T / AP-T / Fuzed HE-I is the default according to IJAAF's 1942 instruction. Is the ammo belt based on history, or has it been determined for game balance? Do the developers know about Japanese fuzeless HE-I called Special Incendiary?

A. ???Not all belts are historical, especially with respect to “default” belts. Yes, in the sets of advanced belts, some of the fillings really repeat the ones actually used at one time or another, but not all. And yes, we know about Japanese 12.7mm explosive bullets without a fuse, but in such a calibre all high-explosive ammunition will have a similar striking effect, especially when we speak of lighter 12.7mm Breda machine guns. Therefore, we did not make a separate Japanese specific bullet. Within the game settings, the difference will be invisible to the player.

Q. Germany had their own unique versions of the FIAT G.91 like the G.91R/3 with 30mm cannons. Now that Rank V premiums are being added, is this aircraft under consideration to be added in the future? It would be great to see.

A. ???Yes, we have plans for this German aircraft.

Q. Many of the air-to-air missiles added in update 1.85 were intended to be used against bombers. They are not as effective or useful in fights against fighter aircraft, so aircraft like the Javelin (That were dedicated all weather bomber interceptors) can't really be used like they were supposed to be. You previously talked about plans for more advanced CAS aircraft, however has there been any further consideration or plans for Rank VI bombers like the Vulcan, Victor, Valiant, Tu-16 and early B-52 / Tu-95s? These would be really interesting machines to see in War Thunder.

A. ?When we talked about more advanced attack aircraft, we did not mean heavy / strategic bombers, but subsonic attack planes or fighter bombers. Aircraft such as the B-52 are still very special purpose.

Q. I’ve the feeling that the gunners on the bombers seem to have got worse. They almost don’t notice approaching aircraft. Don’t you think appearance of new aircraft and missiles, the gunners should get upgraded Keen Vision?

A. There haven’t been any specific changes to the gunners.

Helicopters

Q. The MI-4V is a really unpopular helicopter. It's not much fun to use even when upgraded. Are you planning any additional starter helicopters to help alleviate this?

A. ??Mi-4 is a reserve helicopter. It performs the role of the initial helicopter and is fully consistent with its task. It is not planned to change the reserve helicopter in the helicopter tree of the USSR.

Q. Helicopter Battles could really benefit from more AI. Do you have plans for escort missions where you perhaps have to aid cargo and troop transports like the CH-47 Chinook or Mi-26?

A. ???Maybe in the future.

Q. Do you foresee helicopters of nations not currently in game ever being added to major nations as premiums? Such as the Denel Rooivalk (South Africa) or T129 ATAK (Turkey)?

A. ???Yes, such options are possible.?

Navy

Q. Is there any news on minelaying vehicles? We were shown the VS-8 during a test event, but nothing since then.

A. ???Yes, we have not forgotten or canceled mine weapons. Just adding it to ships and vessels that could carry them takes some time. Our current plans are to make mines one of the types of exchangeable weapons (instead of depth charges, for example) for those ships that could use mines.

Q. German S-boats are very nice, but are there plans to add more variants? Such as the S-7, S-10 or S-13 class?

A. ???Yes, we do not exclude the possibility of these vessels. But these will all be low-level boats, because the armament there is rather weak for a large (for a boat) displacement.

Q. In the case of France, if a full Naval tree is not possible soon after Japan and Italy, is it possible we may see a few premium ships soon like what happened with Italian Ground Forces? (P40 and M26 were added a year before the tree to give players something to use)

A. ???It's too early to talk about it.

Other

Q. The hit camera is very nice, but it breaks your smoke mechanics, showing the enemy behind the smoke with the help of machine gun fire. Will you be working on this?

A. We’ve discussed this issue with our team several times, but did not find a solution that satisfied us more than the current one. It has its pros and cons.

Q. Do you want to add premium boats to the War Bonds store?

A. They are already there! Check out War Bonds for May.