摘要

1、The abstract needs major modification, for it lacks the significance of study. Brief overview of this area should be given, and the purpose of the study could be addressed in the end.“Methods”is not detailed enough. “Methods” and “Results” were not comprehensive and coherent, and significance of article is prominent.

解析：在摘要中，背景知識不可缺少，但不用過多介紹，一般一句話就好。研究目的需要說明，不然會讓人搞不清楚你到底要做什么，在讀方法和結(jié)果的時候沒有目的性也會增加理解難度，給審稿人不好的印象。方法描述要在字?jǐn)?shù)允許的范圍內(nèi)盡可能的詳細(xì)，結(jié)果要與方法相呼應(yīng)。最后，需要說明一下研究的意義，這點也是不容忽視的。

2、In the abstract, the methods and results need to be written in more detail for better understanding, including the concentrations and the p values.

解析：在摘要部分，方法與結(jié)果部分需要較為詳細(xì)地描述，處理的濃度以及p值都要標(biāo)注出來。

前言

1、The “background” section of the abstract is unacceptably vague. It does not establish the rationale for the study and needs to be rewritten. Moreover, the highlights and significance are scarcity, and the objective have to be added.

解析：引言一定要突出本研究的亮點和意義。

2、In Introduction: Describe more about the importance of using?×× in vaccines against malignant tumors.

解析：不用具體詳細(xì)的描述某一機制，只需要介紹其機制目前的研究現(xiàn)狀和進展即可。

3、In Introduction: include the objective of this study to end of this section.

解析：引言最后一段要交代清楚研究對象和研究內(nèi)容。

4、The introduction is clear and well-written. Whereas, the cell surface antigens of ××?may be described here. Besides, the sentence “Recent study found that ××?is a potent inducer of chondrogenesis in ××, which could promote the expression of ××, and accelerate chondrogenic differentiation of ××?with the two-dimensional culture condition” lacks supports (references).

解析：文章中的主要檢測指標(biāo)要在前言中給出相應(yīng)的背景介紹，避免在結(jié)果中直接出現(xiàn)會有些突然，但是如果是某一類指標(biāo)的檢測則不需要一一介紹，比如炎癥因子檢測，只需要說明炎癥的作用就行，沒有必要一一介紹所檢測的指標(biāo)了；另外在前言中所有的觀點都要有理論依據(jù)，即參考文獻(xiàn)的引用。

討論

1、Discussion is not enough and reference lacks the latest research. The content of this discussion lack the comparison with previous study. These results need to contact the relevant literatures to describe the mechanism and significance. There are many similar studies, what is special about this study comparing to another study?

解析：參考文獻(xiàn)不夠新，討論里的陳述一定要有近兩年的研究，引用最新的研究更有說服力；其次要注意在討論里與前人的研究進行比較；還有就是要在討論里通過與前人研究的比較突出自己研究的重要性和創(chuàng)新性。

2、“××?from cord blood monocytes are sensitive to ××?mainly because of the immature immune system; on the contrary, ××?from peripheral blood monocytes are difficult to be affected and that is generally attributed to the capacity to maintain immune homeostasis.” Sentences such as this in the Discussion make many of this section look speculative. Enough referencing should be provided.

解析:討論中的所有描述和推斷都要有文獻(xiàn)作為依據(jù)。

3、The manuscript needs a section on the study limitations (e.g., small sample size, generalization to humans and larger animals, relevance of induced diabetes model) as well as a conclusions section.

解析：在文章討論中應(yīng)該加入文章局限性的描述：例如樣本量小，不能直接代表人或者其他大型動物等以及文章建模方法的局限性。對于當(dāng)前的文章設(shè)計不能解決的問題，我們可以整理在文章的討論中的局限性，也可以回避一些無關(guān)重要實驗結(jié)果的當(dāng)前不能解決的問題。

4、Discussion section was not deeply analyzed，with extension and inference.Please add some statements what is the clinical significance of this study and how could it be widely used in the treatment of diseases.

解析：討論的內(nèi)容需要應(yīng)該更深入一些，對文章結(jié)果提示出的關(guān)鍵科學(xué)問題需系統(tǒng)地討論；討論中還需要描述本研究的價值及臨床意義，這也是文章討論中的重要內(nèi)容，只有突出文章研究的應(yīng)用價值才能突顯文章研究的意義。

其他問題

1、The English is poor and needs to still be reworked.

解析：語言問題很難避免的，所以在SCI論文寫作的時候，首先要盡量避免拼寫和語法錯誤，至于語言問題，可以找比自己英語好的同事或朋友幫忙潤色，如果想要放心，可以直接交給潤色公司進行潤色。

2、All the abbreviations should be written in full on first mention.

解析：專有名詞在摘要、正文第一次提到時要給出英文全稱。