????????外交部發(fā)言人趙立堅23日在例行記者會上再次揭露澳大利亞戰(zhàn)略政策研究所，他指出，這家所謂“研究所”既不“獨立”，也不“研究”，在澳大利亞國內(nèi)也不得人心。

????????記者提問：前段時間，《中國日報》發(fā)布紀錄片，揭露澳大利亞戰(zhàn)略政策研究所(ASPI)，其所謂涉華研究都是接受美國政府和軍工企業(yè)資助的，引發(fā)澳方強烈關(guān)注。ASPI回應(yīng)稱，自己是獨立研究機構(gòu)，中國是想要堵住外界的批評，請問中方對此有何評論？

????????趙立堅回應(yīng)稱：

• “這家所謂‘研究所’的回應(yīng)毫無道理，ASPI向來以炮制各種涉華虛假信息為生，在事實面前一次又一次被打臉?！?/p>

• These remarks of this so-called institute are senseless at all. It makes a living by creating all kinds of disinformation on China, but it got a slap in the face time and again by facts.

• “ASPI自稱是‘獨立研究機構(gòu)’，今天我就跟大家好好分享一下，它既不‘獨立’，也不‘研究’，在澳大利亞國內(nèi)還不得人心?！?/p>

• Despite its claim of being an "independent research institute", the fact is, it is neither "independent" nor a "research" body, and it's highly unpopular in Australia.

????????趙立堅進一步解釋稱：

????????說它不“獨立”，是因為它長期接受美國國防、外交機構(gòu)和軍火商資助，反華意識形態(tài)色彩非常濃厚，熱衷于炮制和炒作各種反華謊言。它嘴上說“獨立”， 實際上很“拜金”，對其金主忠心耿耿，甘愿淪為美國反華勢力的“急先鋒”，充當(dāng)他們的“牽線木偶”。

ASPI is not "independent" as it has long been funded by?US?defense and diplomatic authorities as well as arms manufacturers, which makes it full of anti-China ideology and keen to make and spread anti-China lies.?It claims to be "independent" but is in fact money-driven.?It is loyal to its sponsors and willing to be a vanguard and puppet for the?US?anti-China forces.?
????????澳大利亞《金融評論報》就發(fā)表文章揭露這家所謂“研究所”背后的資助方，諷刺它實質(zhì)上受到美國反華勢力等掌控。澳大利亞公民黨在其官方刊物上發(fā)表文章，揭批其打著“學(xué)術(shù)和中立”幌子，配合美國和澳大利亞情報機構(gòu)攻擊中國。

The Australian Financial Review also exposed the sponsors behind this "institute" and satirized it for being at the disposal of anti-China forces in the?US.?Australian Citizens Party also published an article to criticize this institution for cooperating with the?US?and Australian intelligence communities to attack China under the pretext of academics and neutrality.

????????說它不“研究”，是因為它炮制的所謂“涉華報告”缺乏事實依據(jù)，毫無學(xué)術(shù)價值，完全違背學(xué)術(shù)研究應(yīng)有的職業(yè)道德操守。其觀點和線索要么來自美國反動非政府組織，要么使用無從證實和溯源的所謂“目擊證據(jù)”，甚至把互動式地圖說成是衛(wèi)星照片。

ASPI is not a "research" body because its reports on China are baseless, lacking academic value, and totally against professional ethics. Its views and clues are either from American NGOs that are against the trend of the times, or "eyewitness evidence" that cannot be proved or traced back. They even identified interactive maps as satellite photos.?

????????以所謂“新疆文化滅絕”報告為例，該報告荒謬地將新疆擁有外墻的建筑都視為“拘留中心”，報告所稱的380個所謂“拘留中心”均為民事機構(gòu)。比如，所謂吐魯番市“拘留中心”實際上是當(dāng)?shù)匦姓C構(gòu)的辦公大樓；所謂喀什市“拘留中心”實際上是當(dāng)?shù)馗咧械仍盒！?/p>

Let's take its report on so-called "genocide in Xinjiang" as an example.?It ridiculously regards all buildings with exterior walls in Xinjiang as "detention centers", and all the 380 "detention centers" it identified are all civil institutions. For instance, the so-called "detention center"?in Tulufan is in fact an administrative building, and the "detention center" in Kashi is a local high school.?

????????這些在谷歌、百度地圖中均有標(biāo)注， 大家可以去查閱。

You may refer to Google Map or Baidu Map as these locations are all marked in those maps.

????????說它不得人心，是因為澳大利亞國內(nèi)諸多有識之士都對它嗤之以鼻。澳大利亞前駐香港總領(lǐng)事梅卓琳批評該所學(xué)者漢密爾頓對中國的政治制度缺乏基本認知。

ASPI is highly unpopular because many Australians with vision consider it beneath contempt. Jocelyn Chey, Australia's former consul-general to Hong Kong, criticized ASPI's Clive Hamilton for lacking the basic knowledge of China's political system.?

????????澳大利亞前駐華大使芮捷銳批評它是“澳大利亞‘中國威脅論的總設(shè)計師’”。澳大利亞前外長鮑勃·卡爾批評它擁有“片面、親美的世界觀”。

Geoff Raby, former Australian ambassador to China, criticized ASPI as "very much the architect of the China threat theory in Australia".?Bob Carr, former Australian foreign minister, accused ASPI of pumping out a "one-sided, pro-American view of the world".

????????這家所謂“研究所”顛倒黑白、撒謊成性，早已在中國惡名昭著， 并成為國際社會的笑柄。相信大家今后會擦亮眼睛，明辨是非，共同抵制這個“謠言制造機”和“謠言販賣機”。

This institute has long been notorious in China and a laughing stock for the world due to its behaviors of distorting facts and habitual lying.?I believe you will all be sharp-eyed and jointly reject this?"rumor-maker" and "rumor-spreader".

????????10月10日，中國日報在全球各大社交媒體平臺發(fā)布了紀錄片《起底外媒：虛偽的西方宣傳系統(tǒng)》，直戳西方宣傳的痛處。紀錄片揭露了澳洲智庫ASPI聯(lián)合政客媒體炮制虛假涉華“報告”，炒作中國話題。該片一出便引發(fā)澳大利亞媒體的強烈反響。

????????點擊觀看中國日報紀錄片《起底外媒：虛偽的西方宣傳系統(tǒng)》：

????????他們的報道試圖反駁紀錄片中揭批的內(nèi)幕，但卻拿不出任何證據(jù)，只是蒼白無力地重復(fù)，“ASPI作為一個智庫，其工作是真正獨立的?！?（ASPI's work as a think tank is genuinely independent.）

來源：中國日報雙語新聞

視頻：孟哲?高亞美

編輯：王瑜?胡雨濛?徐潘依如 左卓