Niklas Luhmann的文章 "與滑板箱溝通。Niklas Luhmann的文章《用滑板箱交流：一個(gè)經(jīng)驗(yàn)性的敘述》描述了作者使用滑板箱或索引卡文件作為交流的伙伴。作者認(rèn)為，沒(méi)有書(shū)寫(xiě)就不可能思考，而使用滑板箱可以在交流中創(chuàng)造一個(gè)合格的伙伴。作者還指出，一個(gè)交流系統(tǒng)要想成功并持續(xù)較長(zhǎng)的時(shí)間，就必須是開(kāi)放的，不局限于特定主題。作者還指出，滑板箱必須以某種方式結(jié)構(gòu)化，以滿足成功溝通的必要要求。

在 "與滑板箱的溝通。作者Niklas Luhmann在 "與滑板箱溝通：一個(gè)經(jīng)驗(yàn)性的敘述 "的第二部分，描述了滑板箱的技術(shù)要求及其功能。作者解釋說(shuō)，使用的是帶抽屜的木箱和八分之一大小的紙條，為了便于查找，紙條應(yīng)該只寫(xiě)在一面。作者還建議使用普通的紙而不是卡片紙，以抵消箱子的排列變得太大、難以從椅子上使用的趨勢(shì)。作者還解釋說(shuō)，他們決定不按照主題和子主題進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)排序，而是選擇一個(gè)牢固的固定位置。這樣就可以任意地進(jìn)行內(nèi)部分支、鏈接，并有一個(gè)登記簿來(lái)幫助重新發(fā)現(xiàn)筆記。

在 "與滑板箱溝通的第三部分。Niklas Luhmann的 "經(jīng)驗(yàn)之談 "中，作者討論了如何在溝通中教育伙伴，以及滑板箱如何表現(xiàn)出極大的獨(dú)立性。作者解釋說(shuō)，通過(guò)將滑板箱簡(jiǎn)化為一個(gè)固定但正式的放置順序，以及由此產(chǎn)生的秩序和無(wú)序的結(jié)合，它可以成為一個(gè)通用的工具，幾乎可以用來(lái)放置任何東西，并且可以成為一個(gè)敏感的系統(tǒng)，在內(nèi)部對(duì)許多想法作出反應(yīng)。作者還提出，當(dāng)內(nèi)部鏈接網(wǎng)絡(luò)被激活時(shí)，與滑箱的交流會(huì)變得更加富有成效，滑箱提供了從未計(jì)劃或預(yù)先設(shè)想的組合可能性。作者強(qiáng)調(diào)，與滑板箱的交流只有在評(píng)價(jià)的時(shí)刻才會(huì)變得富有成效，而且受制于一定的時(shí)間，具有很大的偶然性。

在 "與滑板箱的溝通 "的第四部分。作者Niklas Luhmann在 "與滑板箱溝通：一個(gè)經(jīng)驗(yàn)性的敘述 "的第四部分中，討論了這種溝通的結(jié)果是否也是偶然的問(wèn)題。他認(rèn)為，意外在科學(xué)理論中的作用是沒(méi)有爭(zhēng)議的，意外對(duì)于進(jìn)步是很重要的。他還聲稱，真正的問(wèn)題是產(chǎn)生具有足夠大的選擇概率的意外。他還提到，與滑板箱的交流當(dāng)然只是眾多可能性中的一種，但它可以被認(rèn)為是一種功能上的等價(jià)物，在速度和相互適應(yīng)性方面有很多優(yōu)勢(shì)。?

使用www.DeepL.com/Translator翻譯（免費(fèi)版）

在Niklas Luhmann的《與卡片盒交流的實(shí)證報(bào)告》中，第四部分討論了結(jié)果是否是偶然的問(wèn)題。 他認(rèn)為，在科學(xué)理論中事故的作用是不爭(zhēng)的，事故對(duì)于進(jìn)步是重要的。 他還認(rèn)為，真正的問(wèn)題是如何制造具有足夠增強(qiáng)的概率的事故來(lái)進(jìn)行選擇。 他還提到，與卡片盒交流當(dāng)然只是許多可能性之一，但它可以被視為功能等價(jià)物，并在速度和相互適應(yīng)性方面具有許多優(yōu)勢(shì)。

The?article "Communicating with Slip Boxes: An Empirical Account" by Niklas Luhmann describes the author's use of a slip box or index card file as a partner in communication. The author argues that it is impossible to think without writing and that using a slip box allows for the creation of a competent partner in communication. The author also states that for a communicative system to be successful and last for a longer period of time, it must be open and not limited to specific themes. The author also states that the slip box must be structured in a certain way to fulfill the necessary requirements for successful communication.

In the second part of "Communicating with Slip Boxes: An Empirical Account" by Niklas Luhmann, the author describes the technical requirements for a slip box and its functionality. The author explains that wooden boxes with drawers and octavo-sized paper slips are used, and notes should only be written on one side for ease of searching. The author also recommends using normal paper instead of card stock to counteract the tendency for the arrangement of boxes to become too large and difficult to use from a chair. The author also explains that they have decided against systematic ordering in accordance with topics and sub-topics and instead have chosen a firm fixed place. This allows for arbitrary internal branching, linking, and a register to help rediscover notes.

In the third part of "Communicating with Slip Boxes: An Empirical Account" by Niklas Luhmann, the author discusses how to educate a partner in communication and how a slip box can exhibit great independence. The author explains that by reducing the slip box to a fixed, but formal order of placement, and the resulting combination of order and disorder, it can become a universal instrument that can be used to place almost anything in it, and can be a sensitive system that internally reacts to many ideas. The author also suggests that communication with the slip box becomes more fruitful when internal network of links is activated and that the slip box provides combinatorial possibilities that were never planned or preconceived. The author emphasizes that the communication with the slip box becomes productive only at the moment of evaluation and is bound to a certain time and is highly accidental.

In the fourth part of "Communicating with Slip Boxes: An Empirical Account" by Niklas Luhmann, the author addresses the question of whether the results of this kind of communication are also accidental. He argues that the role of accidents in the theory of science is not disputed and that accidents are important for progress. He also claims that the real problem is one of producing accidents with sufficiently enhanced probabilities for selection. He also mentions that communication with slip boxes is certainly only one of many possibilities, but it can be considered as a functional equivalent and has many advantages in terms of speed and mutual adaptability.