geological? adj 地質(zhì)（學(xué)）的

<歷年真題考查頻次：9次>

真題復(fù)現(xiàn)1：A comparison of British geological publications over the last century and a half reveals not simply an increasing emphasis onthe primacy of research，but also a changingdefinition of what constitutes an acceptable research paper.（2001年text1P3）

真題翻譯：對(duì)過(guò)去一個(gè)半世紀(jì)英國(guó)地質(zhì)出版物的比較表明，不僅越來(lái)越強(qiáng)調(diào)研究的首要地位，而且對(duì)什么是可接受的研究論文的定義也在變化。

真題復(fù)現(xiàn)2：Thus，in the nineteenth century，local geological studies represented worthwhile research in their own right；but，in the twentieth century，local studies have increasingly become acceptable to professionals only if they incorporate，and reflect on，the wider geological picture.

（2001年text1P3）

真題翻譯：因此，在十九世紀(jì)，地方地質(zhì)研究本身就代表了有價(jià)值的研究；但是，在20世紀(jì)，只有納入并反思更廣泛的地質(zhì)圖景，地方研究才越來(lái)越為專(zhuān)業(yè)人士所接受。

真題復(fù)現(xiàn)3：The overall result has been to make entrance to professional geological journals harder for amateurs，a result that has been reinforced by the widespread introduction of refereeing，first by national journals in the nineteenth century and thenby several local geological journals in the twentieth century.（2001年text1P3）

真題翻譯：總體結(jié)果是，業(yè)余愛(ài)好者更難進(jìn)入專(zhuān)業(yè)地質(zhì)期刊，裁判的廣泛引入強(qiáng)化了這一結(jié)果，首先是19世紀(jì)的國(guó)家期刊，然后是20世紀(jì)的幾家地方地質(zhì)期刊。